first thing to realize is that compromise usually involved splitting the difference (e.g. arbitration -- if you've ever been privy, you know exactly what i mean).
next you need to understate that starting positions matter
now we come to the republicans..
they know to start out WAY to the right of anything sane
democrats, being slightly more reasonable tend to open with somthing they thing will win the other side over to their POV.
... it ... will ... not ....
so this happens.
after a few years of this (say since 1980) you end up with both parties being FAR to the right of anything that a rational person would consider CENTER
enter #bernie sanders and his populist, moderate policy positions like #medicareforall or raising the minimum wage
he's widely criticized by "both sides" as being some kind radial socialist loon when he's anything but and is widely seen as anything but, by the vast majority of citizens who are not caught up in the trap described above, or by partisan demagoguery.
so when you see ppl say "compromise is bad" this is most likely what they mean.
compromise has led us to where we are, ruled by neoliberal elite to haven't the foggiest idea what the average person is thinking or what they need.
this was called the #southernstrategy and is what got Reagan elected.
anyone remember the #moralmajority? (which was neither, btw)
then, @TheDemocrats proceeded to sidle up to the corporations, eventually over taking the role of corporate money funnel to drain the 99% of any hope for retirement, health security, or peace.
all whilst while china wealthy and building their middle class.
Existing renewable energy potential and technologies, including storage can generate sufficient and secure power to cover the entire global electricity demand by 2050.
Total levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) on a global average for 100% renewable electricity in 2050 is €52/MWh (including curtailment, storage and some grid costs), compared to €70/MWh in 2015.