Seuss was, Egan writes, quiet upset about phosphorus burdens on Great Lakes/Lake Erie. Long before Geisel became Suess, he did ad work, including for Flit! pesticides. Of course, by 1960s+, research in Great Lakes basin taught science a lot about wildlife effects+ of DDT.
There’s more to the Erie-Lorax story. Seuss, @danpatrickegan notes, revised Lorax, later taking out line re: Erie, a nod to civic/science to address pollution, though the lake was still struggling to recover. See: The Life and Death of the Great Lakes for deets. #envhist
For contribution of Great Lakes basin to body of env science/wisdom, consider reading about #TheoColborn (either her own writings, or Sheldon Krimsky’s Hormonal Chaos.) But also Michael Gilbertson: eea.europa.eu/publications/e…#envhist#POPs
Like The Lorax, sci understanding of endocrine disruption & low-dose toxicity were gifts, too, of the Great Lakes Basin. From studies of its wildlife Colborn puzzled the pattern in research documenting non-cancer effects in chronic organochlorine exposed wildlife. #envhist#lorax
I’ve heard lovely tales about how the scientists at @SilentSpringIns — named for Rachel Carson’s book that brought unexamined overuse of DDT and brethren OC pesticides up for debate in the 1960s — gathers to read the Lorax once a year in a staff meeting. ❤️ —The End—