NEW #brexitforensics Government signing series of secret agreements with private sector over Brexit border outcomes/data including for No Deal - Non Disclosure Agreements deemed “extremely unusual” and “paranoid” by Public Accounts Comm chair: FULL STORY news.sky.com/story/brexit-g…
WATCH: Sky News exclusive #brexitforensics Report on secret agreements over Brexit border -
THREAD: 1. Several sources who basically operate the currently frictionless border, have attended Brexit Border consultations said they were highly surprised to be asked to sign non-disclosure agreements - some refused saying too much Brexit secrecy
2. PAC Chair Hillier says while you might get NDAs for commercial contractors, it would be “extremely unusual” to demand them over consultations, says “paranoid” and appear designed to “shackle” criticism.
3. My understanding is that they cover a two way flow of information - a. the Government needs private data to work out the impact of new border checks, it, by definition, simply does not collect under currently frictionless arrangements...
4. And also told there is a number of Brexit scenarios set out by Government for these operators to respond to, including No Deal, which gives new detail on border outcomes
5. This has been requested from the “Border Planning Group” of cross Whitehall officials, which set up a Coordination Group, after ministerial permission, with private sector to test out various Border scenarios
6. But the requirement to sign NDAs has now spread to a variety of other smaller technical committees, with one industry source telling me “many dozens” of NDAs have been signed, creating a kind of “bizarre secret society” where trade bodies can’t even compare notes
7. In fact I’m told that there are two consultative meetings happening today at HMRC for which attendees have been obliged to sign NDAs
8. HMRC has responded confirming that, yes, the Government is signing Brexit NDAs “with key delivery partners for the border” and suggested that it is “standard practice for the Government to use NDAs”. It did not answer how many have been signed.
9. MPs responding to the story, however, such as Chuka Umunna say it is a “shocking and very serious development” and that “MPs must be provided with this information in order to reach an informed view on the Customs and trade Bills”
10. Official Opposition response from @PaulBlomfieldMP “disturbing evidence of a Government obsessed with secrecy and intent on keeping the public in the dark about their plans for Brexit”
Lastly - private sector chair of Joint Customs Consultative committee on Brexit, Peter MacSwiney, told me: “I don’t understand what the secrecy is, I don’t know what is causing this paranoia”.
Since interview he was asked to sign NDA, and refused, citing Brexit secrecy concerns
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW: First Minister of Scotland @NicolaSturgeon tells me at SNP conference “it would be my position “that Northern Ireland backstop on single market being negotiated right now should also apply to Scotland
The First Minister tells me she is “not going to stand in the way of NI having a solution to its issues” but that a NIO-only backstop raises “profound concerns on my part” for the competitiveness of Scotland and losing investment to Northern Ireland
I suggested to FM that surely that would imply checks on the England-Scotland border...
She said “I don’t want checks ... lets wait and see how this all plays out”
The border checks acknowledged by @simoncoveney to @SophyRidgeSky are east-west GB->N Ireland ones on food/farm produce, not North-South ones. not sure how much further that gets us, when senior DUP sources have said they would not accept any increase in what is checked...
salient fact here: offer indicated by PM amid her demand for “respect” after Salzburg was such extra NI checks/ regulatory alignment with Ireland could only be contemplated if approved for NI by Stormont - as of last week had been rejected by EU/IE, & DUP said wd veto there
nothing on paper yet though, and there is of course, no NI Assembly to reject anything...
There is some potential wriggle room, however, for example, if any further east-West checks required, could be one way ie not west-east, enabling NI produce free access to U.K. AND EU
Ministers are well aware of this case, I’ve been told that its significance may be being underplayed, I had been told that the Government would seek to appeal the Court of Session’s reference to the ECJ, but apparently didn’t, or haven’t at the most appropriate opp this week...
This is the actual reference from Scotland’s highest court directly to the European Court of Justice asking for a clarification on whether EU Law (ie Article 50) allows for unilateral revocation dropbox.com/s/3sq5dvjh8ruc… via one of the petitioners @JolyonMaugham
It could have got rather interesting constitutionally if the UK Gov had asked the Supreme Court to overrule Scotland’s highest court asking the EU Court whether a UK Govt had theoretical option to revoke A50 without negotiation, options it says it does not want.
Johnson calls the PM’s Chequers proposals
“Not pragmatic not a compromise.. this is not democracy, not what we voted for... it is a constitutional outrage” to cheers...
Says to fudge it now and fix it later “is a total fantasy”
“Chequers will only embolden those calling for a second referendum” says Johnson...