1) On Wed Jan 10, 2018, Trump signed the Interdict act. It is an acronym for “International Narcotics Trafficking Emergency Response by Detecting Incoming Contraband with Technology”
During the signing he made some interesting ....
2) comments about how to solve the issue:
"There is an answer. I think I actually know the answer, but I'm not sure the country is ready for it yet," he said, before looking around at some of the lawmakers. "Does anybody know what I mean? I think so."
This thread may take a long time (weeks or months) to finish. Why? I am not a professional investigator and this is going to be complex.
Big names here on twatter are invested in this website. Big issues are at stake.
2) Stealth Jeff @drawandstrike and The ConservativeTreeHouses @TheLastRefuge2 along with @Gingrich_of_PA seem to have an open fued on the legitimacy of those involved in the RFTP (Report for The President)/JTFMaga organizations and the honesty of those in opposition.
3) Let me start by saying my dog in this fight is to support Law & Order.
I will admit I am a nobody. I have barely 1100 followers. I am not here to question their conclusions (because I mostly agree - there was no collusion and @GenFlynn is a hero who was/is being treated ...
“As for the judges on the secret intelligence court: "It looks to me just based on your reporting, that they have been misled," the president said, citing a series of columns in The Hill newspaper
2) identifying shortcomings in the FBI investigation. "I mean I don't think we have to go much further than to say that they've been misled."
"One of the things I'm disappointed in is that the judges in FISA didn't, don't seem to have done anything about it.I'm very disappointed
3) in that Now, I may be wrong because, maybe as we sit here and talk, maybe they're well into it. We just don't know that because I purposely have not chosen to get involved,"
My interpretation? Trump is giving the fisa judges the benefit of the doubt. That they werent
Security clearance issue: I will say this again, security clearance is not a problem UNLESS
a) these losers who have left govt service can retain their clearances for all i care. It DOES NOT mean they have further access to classified info. If someone is giving them info they
should be prosecuted.
Brennan, Comey et al., have NO NEED TO KNOW
need to know, not clearance level, dictates a persons access. A clearance gives them no access by itself. Someone has to give them info and since they have no need to know, it is a crime.
b) the losers expose
classified info they already know, in their heads, they should be prosecuted.
c) they retained any classified documents after leaving they should be prosecuted
thats it folks
Why allowing w people who leave govt svc to keep a clearance? Here is why
Question no one is asking yet is: Why did they help Al Qaeda and WHY admit it now?
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @kredo0 view original on Twitter
2) Why did they help Al Qaeda?
Answer) They hate America (the big satan), They hate Israel (little satan)
The Mullahs have been spreading hate, and supporting terrorists around the world since 1979.
3) Funding jihadist movements, supporting hamas, hezbollah, attacking US troops in Iraq, Khobar towers, taliban support. Bin Laden was given refuge there for who knows how long.
1) Disgraced Former Deputy Director (and acting Director) seeks immunity from Congress in exchange for his testimony. WHAT? This is disgraceful ...
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @thelastrefuge2 view original on Twitter
2). This comes as Former FBI Deputy under McCabe in charge of the Counter Intel Division (Peter Strzok’s BOSS) testified to congress today and is reported by Laura Ingraham as being “very cooperative)
3). As the ConservativeTreehouse article states, Senator Chuck Grassley is considering this, but wants to know far more about what McCabe will testify to.
The thought is that getting McCabe immunity will mean open public testimony where McCabe lays bare all the secrets...
1) People hear “danger to our country” and shrug. They dont really understand the impact this has the potential to be.
America is strong and people believe it will ALWAYS be there, same as it ever was.
That is just not the case. The potential to lose our system of govt
2) is real. Our system relies on FAITH in, and LOYALTY TO, the constitution.
The continual degradation of our liberties is clearly a major goal of the liberal, progressive, socialistic left.
3) Obama’s “fundamental Transformation” was not just a slogan. He and his ilk literally wanted and had 8 years of implementation to destroy our country. It is not yet safe people!
Racial tensions are high
FBI/DOJ is a political arm of the left
Rule of law is no longer applied