But it gets worse. The Bursar of Pembroke College claims here to be presenting an authorized institutional view!
He EXCLUDES the majority of members of the Governing Body from decision-making, on the grounds that they are members of the #USS pension!
Recall that Oxford's Working Party on Pensions *also* excluded #USS members using this spurious "conflict-of-interest" argument. That argument was decisively overturned at the most recent meeting of Oxford's Council. But the damage was already done ...
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @etymologic view original on Twitter
So here we have hard evidence of a classic Oxford stitch-up. The executive gets the Personnel Committee to EXCLUDE ordinary academics, to skew the University's response. The Bursar and his pals speak on behalf of the College. And they just copy-and-paste the same survey answers!
If I were a #USS member on the Governing Body at Pembroke, Oxford, I would be fuming. If I were a Pembroke alumnus in academia, likewise.
Pembroke College's Bursar just copied-and-pasted Oxford University's survey response.
Thus, Oxford got extra "votes" to REJECT the level of risk proposed by the USS trustees. This "broke" the Defined-Benefit pension's viability, and led on to the largest strike in #HE history.
IMO, the full Governing Body of Pembroke College should meet without delay, and debate this issue fully. NO member of the Governing Body should be denied suffrage on spurious grounds. Fin.
Addendum: Pembroke College Oxford, have been advertising for a NEW bursar, to start in Feb 2018. (I wonder if this has anything to do with the UUK survey debacle?)
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @VianBakir1 view original on Twitter
Some key points:
1) Bangor admits to being financially stretched -
"we can't just increase contributions without major challenges"
"the USS scheme that may prejudice the future viability or existence of the Institution"
Three key figures of the #USS pensions dispute were working together in Birmingham on the SMT back in 2012: Alistair Jarvis, David Eastwood and Adam Tickell.
Alistair Jarvis, sans beard, was the Director of Communications & Marketing.
From "Enhancing Birmingham's Reputation" to "Trashing UniversitiesUK's Reputation" in 5 short years.
If only he had stuck to Happiness Lectures ...
Here is Birmingham's VC weighing in on the hot topic of the day - whether or not Birmingham should have an elected mayor.
Prof Sir David Eastwood is now the Chairman of the Board of #USS Trustees. He's also on the Board of UUK, as a "President's nominee" (Prof Dame Janet Beer)
Title: "Draft Response for Colleges to USS consultation 9 2017final to Bursars.pdf"
From: The co-chair of University's Pensions Working Group.
To: All college bursars.
Author: a Director of Xafinity Consulting.
Date: 21st Sep 2017.
THREAD 👇
This is a missing piece of the jigsaw on "collusion" in Cambridge. The document confirms that a University Working Group, set up by Finance Committee, put together a preferred survey response, and sent to bursars. ±12 bursars responded for their colleges, without GB oversight.
The document which has just come to light is the recommended survey response - and was sent as an attachment to the email sent out to Bursars on 21st Sep, the text of which was leaked to @MikeOtsuka here: medium.com/@mikeotsuka/em…
This is a Thread of Threads, to keep track of what I have written on the #USS pensions issue, particularly focussing on the dodgy September survey by UUK, and the role of Cambridge and Oxford.
In reverse chronological order:
1. On FoI documents showing that Cambridge college bursars "colluded" to give *the same* response to the survey.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @etymologic view original on Twitter
2. On Cambridge bursars & their backgrounds in finance:
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @etymologic view original on Twitter
NEW: How 18 Bursars from Cambridge and Oxford got together at OXCAM on 20th September 2017, and helped "steer" the @UniversitiesUK consultation on #USS pension risk. THREAD 👇
Here is a summary of what was discussed on 20th Sep at OXCAM re: the USS scheme. Read on for context & comment ...
Recap: UniversitiesUK claimed in October that "42%" of "HE institutions" had REJECTED the level of risk proposed by the #USS trustees, precipitating a crisis in the Defined-Benefit pension scheme and, indirectly, to this ongoing strike.