Dr Anna Jerzewska Profile picture
Mar 26, 2018 10 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1/ Articles like this explain a very niche and technical topic to a wider audience. Which is fantastic. But it may be bit misleading so in the spirit of clarification a couple of points. Happy to hear other views @instituteforgov instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/rul…
2/ #rulesoforigin do not affect free movement of goods as when you have free movement of goods you don’t need rules of origin. At a time when most people are still trying to figure out what free movement means this might be an important distinction
3/ Preferential and non-preferential #rulesoforigin are so different summarising them both in one article can lead to confusion. The article jumps from one to the other without clarifying which point refers to which type
4/ When talking about outweighing the benefits it can only refer to pref rules as non-pref origin is not optional. All goods need to have an origin declared on import declaration and for other purposes
5/ Last substantial transformation rule applies to non-pref origin. Dealt with slightly differently in preferential rules
6/ Main criteria for substantial transformation under pref origin are: change of classification (can be on different levels not only heading), value added and specific processing. Minimal processing is part of general rules.
7/ PEM is incredibly important for a number of industries with integrated supply chains involving e.g. Turkey. Cannot be dismissed so easily. PEM is being updated at the moment and if successful the consequences of not being a part of it after Brexit could seriously hit the UK
8/ Re diagonal cumulation both @uk_tpo and @SamuelMarcLowe @CER_EU talk about diagonal cumulation with 3rd parties. But diagonal cumulation requires identical #rulesoforigin (see even the WCO on this). So all 3 FTAs would need identical rules.
9/ Sam uses an example of EU-JP #FTA. But this is an example of cross /3rd party /extended cumulation which exists and does not need identical rules. I think this is what we’re talking about here re #Brexit
10/ I wrote about the possible application of cross-cumulation for #Brexit here. Though it's not diagonal, I still completely agree with @SamuelMarcLowe that this is a) a partial solution b) most likely not politically possible. e15initiative.org/publications/b…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Anna Jerzewska

Dr Anna Jerzewska Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(