Nicolas Martin Profile picture
Apr 6, 2018 19 tweets 7 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Remember this dwarf galaxy that was presented as lacking dark matter last week (van Dokkum et al. 2018)? #thread
arxiv.org/abs/1803.10237
Since extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, my student @Nico_Longeard and I decided to have a look at the claim of very low velocity dispersion and M/L in NGC1052-DF2 and, how to say…
Turns out that sampling a distribution function with 10 tracers is tricky. Small number statistics are a pain and the uncertainties on the velocities of the 10 globular clusters studied in the paper are of order the intrinsic velocity dispersion. #tricky
So you can use "fancy" techniques to put together a velocity dispersion estimate (sigma < 10.5 km/s at the 90% confidence level in the paper) that you'll always have doubts about, or you can go back to the basics and write down your likelihood function. #statsareyourfriend
Let's assume all 10 tracers are members of the population we're trying to model and build a simple Gaussian generative model folding in the velocity uncertainties.
\sigma_vr is what we're interested in, the intrinsic velocity dispersion of the population. (delta_{v,sys} is small and irrelevant for the NGC1052-DF2 analysis)
So what happens if you do that? You get this marginalized PDF of \sigma_vr (assuming flat prior) and sigma_vr = 9.5 +4.8/-3.9 km/s if you want to summarise the PDF with 3 numbers.
But I hear someone in the back pointing out that some of the tracers could be outliers and that this inference is only an upper limit on the true, contamination-corrected intrinsic dispersion. That's very possible, so let's have the data tell us what they prefer. #thedataareboss
We now use a model that is the sum of the Gaussian above and a flat contamination over the considered velocity range (we actually used a very, very large Gaussian because we had that code ready) and use \eta as the fraction of the sample that is in the contamination.
And here's what the data tell us… #drumrolls Turns out that the fraction of contaminants could be as high as ~30%, but that it doesn't really affect the PDF of the intrinsic velocity dispersion! (and there's no degeneracy between the 2 parameters, we checked)
Why? Because the velocity point that we'd be the most likely to say is an outlier in the velocity histogram (here from the van Dokkum et al. paper) has a large uncertainty and could perfectly be drawn from the main population; the data are fine with that scenario that they favor.
Bottom line: sigma_vr = 9.5 +4.8/-3.9 km/s (model w/o contamination) or sigma_vr = 9.1 +4.8/-3.6 km/s (model w/ contamination). A far cry from \sigma_vr<10.5 km/s and the 90% CL.
What consequence for the mass-to-light ratio of the system? This. The black PDF is obtained using the Walker et al. (2009) mass estimator within the half-light radius and the red one is the Watkins et al. (2010) estimator used in the NGC1052-DF2 paper. Both agree #yay
Sure, M/L within the tracers could be < 3, but certainly not at the 90% CL as claimed. In fact, it could very well be 4, or 6, or maybe even higher than 8 and perfectly in sync with a dwarf galaxy with dark matter.
In fact, that measurement is perfectly compatible with the Local Group dwarf elliptical NGC 147 and NGC 185 of similar luminosity and that have M/L~4 (Geha et al. 2009).
arxiv.org/abs/0911.3654
Also, fun fact, NGC1052-DF2 sits perfectly on the "universal mass profile" proposed by Walker et al. (2009) for Local Group dwarf galaxies. NGC1052-DF2 is the green point and the red line is the expectation for an NFW profile.
arxiv.org/abs/0906.0341
So what's our take on this? Maybe NGC1052-DF2 lacks dark matter, but the current data set doesn't warrant such a strong conclusion. The current data just aren't very constraining (note that you can't reject either that the dynamical mass of the system is 0!)
And always let the data speak for themselves, especially if you have large uncertainties and small data sets. #endthread
(By the way, if you care about generative models and likelihood, (and you should) you should read this very didactic reference by @davidwhogg, @jobovy, and @dstndstn if you haven't done so already!)
arxiv.org/abs/1008.4686

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicolas Martin

Nicolas Martin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(