More #Socia18 awesomeness! Now, media analysis: “A Path to the Stars vs The Space Frontier: National Space Mythology in Soviet and American Newspapers," by Christina K. Roberts.
Different expressions of national mythology in the space discources in each of these countries, 1957-1969. As noted in the talk title: "A Path to the Stars" (soviet) vs "The Space Frontier" (USA).
The US imagery emphasizes ruggedness, places. The USSR images emphasize connection driven by human effort.
Not much historical work (yet/previously) about this comparison of mythologies, how they made their way into media/newspaper discourse, and social history of space technology: the role of public enthusiasm/participation.
How did regular people interact with space program? What did governments try to do with their outreach, and what did media do with them? Were there expressions of space mythology in 1960s Soviet/American media, and what was the mythology's function?
(Soviet side had one fewer layer, of course: news came from Government Media -> people, instead of US version of Government -> Media -> People)
Space mythology as an interpretive tool - a mechanism of cultural development that gives meaning to events around us, help us understand place in world. Like all myths, represents a shared historical past. Only has to be believable (not factual) to be socially/personally useful.
"Purpose" (effect?) of myths is to be psychologically persuasive. People internalize values, and the mythes create an accessible common identify for social and political organization.
Thesis: state-centered institutions leveraged newspapers to influence public support. 20cen space mythologies oriented national and personal identity, and helped citizens interpret the meaning of the space age in their lives.
Soviet press was full of governmentality. Responsible for instructing public life; purposive rather than reactive. Interplanetary travel a clear goal and people were told they could soon expect to be among the stars.
US press... shoot the slide went by so fast! From memory: press was skeptical about government statement. Thus, the press-based mythology was reactive. No clear goal beyond Reach The Frontier.
Q&A. The "space frontier" mythology is still common from non-government; justification for exploitation. Not in government policy documents, though. And, indeed, our real "frontier" history was full of violence & genocide.
unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Handedness comes in two groups, "right handed" and "not right handed." Most people use their right hands for almost all precision movement, but the other group is a broad spectrum from weakly-right to strongly-left. baen.com/handedness
The way we describe and define handedness creates the effect @CStuartHardwick rightly notices. Culture defines how we talk about it - but the behavior is mostly genetic. The % of righties has remained constant across continents and milennia.
Hand dominance is a more squirrelly thing than most people realize. For example, righties are better at *some* things with their left hand... and *some* of these asymmetries flip in lefties. Take a few minutes on #LeftHandersDay to learn more!
But you should read and learn from the #BlackSpecFic report anyways! The missing data is due to idiosyncrasies of the @EAPodcasts model, and has no impact on any other magazine's numbers.
Long story short, we treat reprints very differently from other magazines. For @escapepodcast specifically, they were ~45% of our 2017 stories, and our editorial process has one unified pipeline for originals + reprints together.
Regretting organizing my two Worldcon panels this year. It means I'm not free to throw up my hands in frustration and give up on programming. The last 24hrs have been the last worst icing on a bad cake that's long been baking.
I mean, my panels will be awesome. But if you're skipping programming because you don't trust the con, you've made a sensible choice.
There are always more people who want to be on programming than can fit. There's no way to make everyone happy. I get that. But this weekend's screwups come in the context of a long chain of trust-erosion.
So glad this one came out! "After Midnight at the Zap Stop" by @ouranosaurus is an awesome story - full of late-night grease, and the luckless & the worthy. But also because it's a #neuroscience teaching opportunity. Might even be a #NeuroThursday!
One offhand line explains a technology as "stimulating a particular set of mirror neurons." Which works as a story element just fine. It sounds plausible and authoritative! But as a neuroscientist, I have strong opinions about #mirrorneurons. I don't think they're real.
To be clear, mine is a controversial opinion. Many neuroscientists would disagree. But it's a hill I'm willing to fight on, especially given how often "mirror neurons" crop up in popular science.
This phenomenon - when you look away from a moving thing, and you briefly see illusory motion in the other direction - is the "Motion Aftereffect," and it comes from some very basic brain maneuvers. Who wants to join me on going full #NeuroThursday here? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_af…
Most neurons in the brain (and elsewhere) do this thing called "adaptation," where they accept whatever's going on as the new normal. For example, if you sit down with your laptop on your lap, you'll soon stop noticing the weight.
This can arise from the crudest single-cell level: some ion channels in the cell membrane have negative feedback loops that self-dampen.