I’m really excited by the range of experiences we collected for this session:
Buyting is currently radio (Quirks & Quarks), formerly TV
Glauser is currently nonprofits (David Suzuki Foundation), formerly marketing, radio, & TV
Baker is online magazine (Hakai) & photographer
Shafer* is community radio (Roundhouse) & researcher in how people communicate climate change.
Tatalović is daily news (freelance), formerly print magazines.
*Misspelled in root tweet, whoops!
Q: Do I need to have pitches prepped to attend the session?
A: No! This is about HOW to pitch, with a few brave souls pitching in public to get constructive criticism on how to pitch better.
#SWCCan2018: Story Pitching up next (3:15) in 1600. LURKING IS FINE, you do NOT need to have pitches prepped to learn!
Q: What do you pitch on behalf of a foundation? @BrendanGlauser: At @DavidSuzukiFDN, it’s mostly responses (to news, policy...) with a bit of original research.
Q: What makes a good TV story? @BrendanGlauser: You always, always need to think what the visuals will be.
Q: What’re my odds of landing a radio pitch?
Both @SonyaBuyting & @dgshafer agree it’s really tough; almost all stories are developed in-house after internal pitching.
Q: What type of stories does @CBCQuirks cover? @ShannaDBaker: Try to cover all major science fields, then a mix of “Oh, wow!”, features, natural history dives, and a scattering of the science of hot buzzy news.
Q: What stories does @hakaimagazine love? @SonyaBuyting: It MUST be coastal with a strong narrative and a strong “So what?” and NO regurgijournalism (things widely covered elsewhere)
A: How do science stories end up on a corporate local radio station like @roundhouse983 that has no dedicated science desk? @dgshafer Daily news has thousands of radio guests a year following the news cycle (including science). More evergreen content sticks around as podcasts
Q: What’s what the most important part of pitching news? @MTatalovic 1. Make sure it’s NEW, especially since print has a lag 2. Make sure it’s a story, not a topic 3. Keep your pitch succinct since the news story will probably be ~400 words
Q: Anything special that makes the rare radio pitch actually get commissioned? @SonyaBuyting “Msje it immersive!” Radio is all about the audio with no visual assistance to evoke the story
[pause during sample pitch, but I’ll pick back up with redacted constructive criticism & lessons we can learn from feedback]
Redacted Pitch: There’s a medical controversy which may or may not be science vs pseudoscience.
Our editors want to know: 1. How much impact does it really have? 2. For a big, complicated idea, find one clear story & stay focused (maybe even multiple stories you pitch desperately). 3. Specify the exact points of scientific uncertainty fueling the controversy.
4. If you plan to write on X, you NEED to be enough of an expert in X to determine if the controversy is science vs science or science vs pseudoscience. If you don’t know, do your research BEFORE you pitch.
5. Complex controversies are PERFECT for longform audio (big radio blocks, podcasts...) where you can feature many voices playing off each other.
Conversely, for print, make a clear outcome/hero so it’s not a frustrating he said/she said.
6. For stories with policy implications (like public health), consider ideal timing! Some stories have natural seasonal hooks — sunburns in summertime, diet in the holidays, etc.
7. RESEARCH THE OUTLET! Target the pitch to their audience, and search their archives to ensure it’s not a repeat.
Redacted Pitch: Why isn’t this medical procedure available?
8. Don’t tease with your setup! If you lead us into why we want X, you can’t end with “And it’s impossible, so nanny nanny foo foo!” Instead, guide into current research, possible future capacity, or viable alternatives 9. Keep the “So what?” clear and central to the pitch
10. The story might not be what you originally thought it was. Be ready to shift your angle & focus to match the story you can tell, not necessarily the idea that first sparked your curiosity.
Q: Can you pitch a story that is JUST about misconceptions? @SonyaBuyting Yes, debunkers are excellent if it’s highly viral.
Q: How does conflict of interest come into play when you’re also a science researcher? @mikamckinnon It’s hugely variable dependent on the outlet. If in danger or in doubt, tell your editor EVERYTHING up front and let them decide.
[conflict of interest cont.] @shannaDBaker Haiaki would never allow you to report on your own work, while @ConversationEDU ONLY allows self-reporting
Both @MTatalovic & @sonyabuyting welcome tips from researchers on their research (where they’re a source, not the writer)
Related: @bl_owens Some places will give you a Finder’s Fee if you pitch a story you can’t write due to conflicts of interest.
Q: I want to leave OR and go to journalism. Is this total anathema? @BrendanGlauser No, but avoid (or declare) pitching stories about your former clients.
Redacted Pitch: I have a project!
11. What exactly do you want as an outcome of the pitch? What actions are you hoping for (audience, partners, funding...)? 12. Be clear on who you are representing — yourself, an organization, or someone else. 13. News must be new. If it’s old research, it needs a current hook.
Proxy question:
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @aerin_j view original on Twitter
For TV... @SonyaBuyting Turnaround is VERY fast, so be incredibly clear on if it can be accomplished quickly. Segments are VERY short (<7min) @dgshafer TV budgets & timing is brutal, so if you have a great story you may want to independently produce video & syndicate it.
Redacted Pitch: Cool obscure natural history story with no current news hook
14. You NEED a hook. “What’s happening now?” New research, an anniversary, a new finding, anything! 15. Some publications do retrospectives on their own archives — see who covered it way back when & give an update. (Like still photo documentary videos of newspaper advices)
Question by proxy?
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @aerin_j view original on Twitter
Q: Does it help to have neat audio, video, or photos to pitch stories? @SonyaBuyting *nodnodnod* @BL_Owens Cool media can make a “Eh, whatev” story something incredible m
Q: What makes a story worth revisiting with an update? @MTatalovic News is new. If it’s something surprising o interesting, we update, but not just more same ol’. But, some publications revisit past cutting edge reporting to see what failed to pan out.
[Revisiting stories cont] @dgshafer 24-hour dedicated news follows stories as they unfold as long as they’re popular with even tiny updates, but bail the moment popularity drops.
Redacted Pitch: I have an idea that would be really hard to pitch...
16. Try unusual outlets! 17. Publish on your own platform (social media) to build brand and network. 18. Look for other similar work and see where it landed.
4:45 Session ends
4:46 1% battery
Thank you!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A woman won the Nobel Prize in Physics?!?!?!? AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
Right. Time to learn about Donna Strickland, the 3rd woman to EVER be awarded the prize. cbc.ca/news/technolog…
I still think the Nobel Prizes (particularly for physics) are sexist garbage with this whole “50 years between each woman” trend they’ve got going on, but I’ll take learning a new name, dammit.
& she’s not even a variant of Maria!!!
I’m not covering the Nobel Prizes, but if any of my women scicomm peeps are doing explainers on chirped pulse amplification of lasers, please ping so I can boost your work. 💥
Camp 1: “THANK YOU! Me/my people can’t evac because xyz. Of course I don’t want to die or endanger rescuers; I did the best I can!”
Their stories are making me so fiercely proud of how determined they are to survive in the face of overwhelming odds against them.
Camp 2: “I live in a country where society has higher standards for providing basic healthcare. What do you mean America doesn’t ensure everyone can evacuate?! Surely not!”
For very specific technical reasons:
- It takes until well after a disaster to establish the official death count as we prioritize saving lives.
- Official death counts are conservative: actual recovered bodies with cause of death linked to the disaster.
Recovering bodies is not always feasible, especially as disasters have a nasty habit of killing response personal.
In BC, the Hope landslide is a grave for 4 people whose bodies were never recovered from under the 47 million cubic meters of rock.
Estimated death counts are extremely tricky. You need to think extremely critically about every assumption made.
Often an actual number is less important than a qualitative description: Every family was devastated. Infrastructure was destroyed for months. Daily life ended.
Even if you think it’s excessive, or over-cautious, or you’ve survived worse. I promise emergency managers don’t issue orders for their own entertainment.
Evac orders are a damn hard call between logistics, vulnerability of destabilization, & loss of trust if it’s conservative.
@markmccaughrean 1. The text of the resolution changed since Monday. Neither the conference website nor the eNewspaper has the updated text.
@markmccaughrean 2. The two head dudes presented their argument to rename, allowed a few comments with no rhyme or reason, ate time refuting criticism, & only named speakers who supported them, before cutting off comment without warning to give a closing statement of support.
@markmccaughrean 3. The Nay vote was presented as “rejection to approve,” because that’s not at all confusing.