As a person who 300+ shows in my 20s, I’ve been sitting here for an hour trying to figure out how Beyoncé’s team did that show. A one time performance? On a festival stage with one hour to complete load-in? With perfect everything — sound, choreography, CAMERA, live editing…
At least 1,000 people worked that show. And I’m not counting the festival staff. I mean her show. On stage, backstage, load-in, production, filming, streaming. How in the world? How? No, really, how?
Live performance TV shows are *never* this good. All the camera work & switching was finely planned and rehearsed (up to the last song, clearly the last song was not). This was two hours. On a *borrowed* stage. A one time shot. They did this ONCE? What? HOW? Every bit perfect.
It’s clear they used a big studio for months of rehearsal. After years of pre-production. They did the show on another stage a zillion times. It’s normal to do so for a giant stadium tour. Where your crew owns the stage. With millions of $$$ in tickets to be sold for that tour.
But how — how her team pulled this off for a one time event, on a borrowed stage. I truly can’t wrap my head around it. She must have demanded so much from Coachella in terms of the stage, control over the sound, setup of the equipment, load-in, etc. otherwise — never this great.
At the root, the business decisions are what blow me away the most. Beyoncé and her team are on such a different level. No one pulls this off but her. There were dozens of people working pyrotechnics alone. With likely no rehearsal. Perfectly. For a one time event. WHO DOES THAT?
You’ll see pyrotechnics like that for the Super Bowl, the biggest TV show of the year with the most expensive ads of the year. Huge budget.
Speaking of Super Bowl halftime show: only 15 minutes long. The camera work and sound is not anywhere near as good…
And of course, the execution of the backstage stuff is not the most important story about #beychella. It’s just the one that has my mouth open at the movement, because I used to do that stuff (on a way tiny scale). The show itself, the performances, the meaning, the statements…
You could compare this concert video to other concert videos (like amazing U2 or Rolling Stones films) — where they tape multiple nights of a tour. After planning everything for the shoot while watching the show. Because the tour’s already underway. And then they cut it later.
This team got that level of quality in one take, switching (editing) live. The teams for the Oscars, Grammys, Super Bowl — none of them pull this off. (And I bet their budgets are way bigger.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you are a developer, and you feel bad about not knowing everything, I have one item I want you to memorize:
No one knows everything. No one.
The best coders in the world only know a small fraction of everything there is to know about coding.
The only skill you need is to know 1) how to identify what you don’t know / when you don’t know something; and 2) how to look things up, how to read documentation, how to try & try & try and keep trying while things fail, until they work. That’s literally the job of writing code.
Everything is always changing anyway. So as soon as you “know” it, it’s changed. Knowing what to do when you are stuck and at a loss — that’s the most important skill. Being ok with that scary feeling of not knowing, that’s the job.
I’m glad we are finally having a conversation about how horrible Facebook’s spying operation is. Can we talk about Google’s yet? We’ve let Google collect all of our email for a decade. And for many of us, all of our work documents. Their bots read & store our corporate docs. Why?
And if you use Chrome, Google is watching everything you do online. If you use Android, they are collecting data history on literally everything you do — on and off line. Why do we opt into this? Because we like the UX of their their free software?
If you install Google Analytics on sites you build, you are helping Google assemble data profiles on people who visit your site. Because we like the charts?
We need to think twice. We need alternatives. Duck Duck Go. Fastmail. Gauges. Firefox. These help. We can try to escape.
Thinking a lot tonight about liberal white supremacy. Conservative white supremacy is known and understood. Backed by naked hate. Liberal white supremacy is wrapped in false pretext. Wealth. Ideas that European culture is superior. White graphic design tradition is simply better.
After a lifetime of allegeric reaction to the snobbery & bullshit of the “mainstream” art / design world, I’ve been really trying over the last three years to not reject it. To absorb the lessons. Read the books. Learn the canon. Force myself to try their ideas of a grid, etc.
And yet, I find myself still really not fitting in. Not being accepted. Not buying it. And the deeper I go, the more I can label what I find as problematic. This blog is actually really racist. This show is totally appropriating non-white culture without credit. Duh, of course.
I'm getting tired of the myth that's going around that the web was only intended to be for ‘documents’ — sharing, & later styling, documents — and that’s why it’s been ‘weak’. Wasn’t designed for ‘apps’.
BS.
The web was invented for sharing an incredible variety of information.
That's what we do today. Share information. The internet of the late 80s had chat, discussion, reading, data — just like today.
The difference is not the intended purpose. The difference is in the power & speed of computers. And that technology needs time to evolve complexity.
Today's computer hardware can handle a level of complexity in our code that computers 30 years ago could not handle. Plus today’s tools & techniques make it possible to program much more complicated stuff.
But the intention for the web today is the same as it’s ever been.