Tristan Cork BLive Profile picture
Apr 23, 2018 21 tweets 6 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
I'm still trying to process the bizarre scenes at Bristol Magistrates Court today.
A directions hearing was held for the controversial case of the police officer who Tasered Ras @Justice4Judah but it didn't happen...…
#Bristol @CleoDanceBaton @pgmhart
Everyone attended what I imagine the prosecution, defence & judge via video link from Westminster assumes would be a formal yet cordial chat about admission of evidence in the case where a police officer is charged with assault.
It was thought that the defence would seek a ruling restricting the evidence admissible in this case.
But he didn’t. Instead, with press: (me from @BristolLive @stevenmorris20 @clairehayhurst @PollitaMarch) he said he wanted to ask if some evidence could be heard ‘in camera’
More than that, he wanted to make that application to bar the press and public from part of the trial right there, and bar the press and public from that too.
There were around 50 members of the public in court.
The defence barrister is representing the police officer accused of assault. The CPS barrister is representing HM the Queen and, I guess, all of us but in particular the alleged victim in this case, Judah Adunbi, 64, who was walking his dog, stopped by police & ended up Tasered.
The CPS barrister had no representations to make about the application to hear some evidence in camera (behind closed doors) nor whether the application itself should be made in camera.
‘Are you sure you have nothing to say?’ said the Judge.
Thankfully, the press is entitled to make representations if they are getting kicked out of a court case.
So I did, pointing out that it was impossible to challenge any application to bar the press & public from part of the case, if the application itself was also heard in camera
‘I see your point’ said the judge.
But he said there was obvs a submission the defence wanted to make in camera so what he’d do would be hear the defence reasons why the application had to be heard in secret, not the application itself, and decide if it should be made in camera
Still following?
It gets stranger
I said that if he decided to hear the submission in secret, or indeed some of the trial in secret, we would apply for a brief adjournment as we would be certain to challenge either of those rulings.
And then we were all out into the corridor.
We came back.
The judge then announced that, while we were out, the defence had not made any submission on hearing part of the case in camera, or any submission why he might want to, after all.
We didn’t know why this had now happened. Or not happened.
But as we then thought we would turn to the defence submission we thought we were there for - what evidence would be admissible - there was another surprise.
There would be no further submissions today. The hearing we were having would be reconvened at Westminster Magistrates Court (where the judge is based & was speaking from).
That’s 120 miles from Bristol.
It gets better....
And that hearing would take place on the day before the trial is due to start.
We are not, still, 4 weeks away, sure where that trial will take place. It could be Chippenham (30 miles) or Salisbury (52 miles), but probably Salisbury.
And because that hearing on what or who can give evidence is the day before, it means witnesses & victim will not know for definite if they are required to go from Bristol to Salisbury until less than 24hrs - maybe just 12 hrs before they should set off.
I do not know what it is that the defence don’t want in open court. I don’t know what submissions on evidence they are going to make.
But what is clear is that they were not prepared to make them in a court in Bristol in front of the press and public.
There was no explanation as to why, if the hearing today in Bristol was already in progress, the defence could not make its submissions then, since we were all there.
There was no explanation as to why, since today’s hearing took place in Bristol with the judge appearing via video link from Westminster, that same arrangement couldn’t happen again for the reconvened pre-trial hearing.
But no, the deputy senior district judge for all England is based in Westminster and anyone interested in hearing this hearing will now have to go to London and then (probably) Salisbury the next day.
This case, its hearings and listings, have already been moved around more than a rock band on tour. Some hearings were scheduled & never happened, some did happen. I think places include:
Taunton, Salisbury, Southampton, Swindon, Chippenham, Bristol.
Clearly the police officer concerned should have a fair trial - it should be scrupulously fair & be seen to be fair.
Justice must be seen to be done, and all that. For @BristolLive that’s proving to be quite a challenge.…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Tristan Cork BLive

Tristan Cork BLive Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TristanCorkPost

Jun 11, 2018
EXCLUSIVE: A Bristol Arena in Temple Meads will cost £65MILLION more than expected, according to the studies commissioned by @MarvinJRees & done by @KPMG
Read the exclusive full story from the peerless @esmeashcroft here>…
The audit into the @bristolarenal site was done by KPMG
KPMG also audit for @YTLcommunity
YTL propose an Arena at Filton
More on that here:…
The main council officers who were working on the @bristolarenal project at Temple Meads left the council to work for YTL on the arena plan at the Brabazon Hangar, something dubbed the @FiltonMegaShed
More on that here:…
Read 16 tweets
Nov 13, 2017
THREAD: The truth about James Dyson moving production abroad to Malaysia because he didn't get planning permission to expand in Malmesbury, Wiltshire, England, Britain.
(Not about Brexit or the EU)
pls RT far and wide. 1/n
So there's loads of commentary about James Dyson (JD) w regards to Brexit etc.
One of the accusations against JD is that he moved production to Malaysia back in the early days.
Many counter that with the story that he was refused planning permission to expand, so moved abroad 2/n
This thread won't be about Brexit & Dyson now, but will tell the truth about what happened back then.
On the day Gordon Brown opened an extension to Dyson factory, which employed 800 making vacuum cleaners (& washing machines), JD unveiled plan for a second factory.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!