Your periodic reminder that cash bail is a fantastically dumb idea. A killer can get bond, while broke people arrested for weed rot in jail pending trial.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @wsmv view original on Twitter
Yes. The federal system, and states that have abolished cash bail, use a threat assessment process to determine whether someone should be released
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @joannadelaune view original on Twitter
Blows my mind
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @serioushabit view original on Twitter
I'd say ending cash bail, automatic expungements, and ending tail light policing are top 3
Prosecutors play a key role, and I agree w/ @Popehat that K Harris was trash as prosecutor and AG
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jack__farmer view original on Twitter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I got nothin
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @superspeeeeed view original on Twitter
At poker night with some friends, didn't even notice the original tweet was getting RT'd like that -- apologies if I missed your @'s
Have definitely had innocent clients plead to speed things along
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @warforgedbard view original on Twitter
Citation?
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @chim0m view original on Twitter
Great. Link?
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @chim0m view original on Twitter
Not disputing it, just know that anecdata is rarely the best data
K
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @chim0m view original on Twitter
🗣: ::makes arbitrary unfounded claim that's the opposite of data in other jurisdictions::
👴🏼: "Cool. Got a source?"
🗣: "GO FIND IT YOURSELF HOW DARE YOU IMPLY I'M LYING!"
(-‸ლ)
Thank you for the link
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @selectodude view original on Twitter
This... makes no sense. The entire reason pretrial release exists is the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Congress can't trump that.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @mickeyduckman view original on Twitter
And problematic for nearly as long. De Tocqueville wrote about it at length in Democracy in America
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @isaac32767 view original on Twitter
Yes. He should be criminally prosecuted and sued into destitution for negligence.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @isaac32767 view original on Twitter
For minor offenses, don't even need an ankle monitor. 90%+ show up just by being given a court date and warned of the consequences if they don't.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @ser1897 view original on Twitter
We have an entire industry (bail bonds) that exists solely b/c ppl get locked up. Threat assessment protocols mean their way of life goes away, so they donate big $$$$$ to legislators
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @benkenkel view original on Twitter
Had Dr. Ford given the same testimony in the same manner in court, you'd have a conviction. Prosecutors absolutely care about numbers; this would be an easy win, even without Kavanaugh's testimony.
The latter. Assume this were a run-of-the-mill Title VII case; typically Plaintiff's attorneys strike at the point they have maximum leverage, which Ford had. You delay when you hope some external event will turn up useful info instead
She may very well be telling the truth. But the FBI is not going to investigate, because even if we assume she's telling the 100% truth, there's no *federal* crime that took place. It's a dodge.
"Love of police brutality is strongly bipartisan. This is what happens when one party loves 'law & order' and the other one loves public sector unions."
-Me
In today's criminal justice news, the Balch Springs PD officer who summarily executed unarmed 15yo black boy #JordanEdwards – and then lied about it to cover it up – has been convicted of murder
Edwards was killed as he and friends peacefully drove away from a lawful house party
Our original thread on the extrajudicial summary execution without due process of Jordan Edwards is here, including the nonsensical police statement released after the shooting
No. A person being pardoned can refuse it, rendering it ineffective. That was the precise issue in Burdick v US, where Burdick refused to accept the pardon so he couldn't be compelled to testify
Impeach and remove faster. There's nothing saying they couldn't do all of that in the span of minutes; the procedural requirements for an impeachment trial are a political question courts can't adjudicate. See Nixon v US (*not* US v Nixon)