This retraction by @AlJazeera actually raises more questions than answers, and to my mind at least, brings to the fore, the fact that our Federal Republic of Anyhowness, has gone global...
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @gimbakakanda view original on Twitter
Yesterday, asides @AlJazeera_World, other news outlets, including the Twitter only news outlet, @spectatorindex said that #Nigeria's ambassador had attended the opening of the American Embassy in #Jerusalem.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @spectatorindex view original on Twitter
Isreali outlets such at @TimesofIsrael and @HamodiaIL also ran with the news. @haaretzcom actually went so far as to publish an infograph that included #Nigeria's name as one of the country's "celebrating with them" on the grand new opening...
So, what is the meaning of all this?
First, on December 22 last year, #Nigeria was among 128 countries that voted in favour of the #UN resolution not to back the American decision to recognise #Jerusalem as #Israel's capital.
A huge party was happening in #Israel, and the Israelis invited everyone (except presumably HAMAS and #Iran). In the diplomatic corps, there MUST be a response to such an invitation, and for multiple outlets to say that #Nigeria was attending, it means our embassy said YES.
If our embassy said YES and attended, it puts us in league with eight other countries, including three other African countries.
While the ideal thing is for a country to make a stand and stick by it, the truth is that at times, realpolitik means we have to change our minds.
There are many reasons why from standing against the move of the embassy in December, #Nigeria could have changed her mind.
#Israel trains a lot of our troops. @realDonaldTrump could have made that a price for the Tucanos.
A change of mind, no matter how inelegant, is valid.
Eight other countries apparently changed their minds, accepted the invite, and followed through.
But, if our embassy said YES, then did not attend, it puts us ALONE.
The implication is that #Nigeria's word isn't our bond - we can't be trusted.
But, let's keep pretending.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Let anybody come and confront me publicly in the National Assembly. What have they been doing? Some of them have been there for 10 years. What have they been doing?" - @MBuhari, 22/5/18
Today while his VP was in #Benue attending the funerals on a number of our countrymen who were killed by suspected herdsmen in the ongoing #PastoralConflict, our President was busy making nonsense of @ProfOsinbajo's efforts by running his mouth in the villa at a campaign event.
While it is common knowledge that Buhari doesn't really care about the average Nigerian, and is more concerned with returning to the Villa next year, it boggles the mind that the man keeps undermining those who could have worked with him to actually give him a decent legacy.
"Two common tales that follow attacks in this conflict (Pastoral Conflict) is that army aircraft were seen dropping supplies to armed herdsmen; and that soldiers were on hand to disarm native populations, just prior to attacks."
"Stories like these have been allowed to gain currency. I have, personally, heard such stories in Kaduna, Benue, Nasarawa, and Imo states."
"Heck, in March this year (2017), the lawmaker from Ethiope East in Delta state’s House of Assembly, Evance Ivwurie, told the House, in session, that soldiers had supplied Fulani herdsmen with arms and ammunition just before an attack in Ovre-Abraka."