1/ The conditions which allowed #WhereAreTheChildren to happen were created by the Obama admin. The recent Sessions policy of separating children from parents at the border will make things even worse for one reason no one really seems to be talking about. Let's talk about it.
2/ We have all heard by now that asylum-seeking parents will be separated from their children and detained. But it gets much, much worse.
They will also be legally orphaned.
3/ Asylum-seeking families have always been processed and released together and their cases joined for review in #ImmigrationCourts. The new Sessions approach is designed to not only reverse that policy, but to inflict maximum harm in the process.
4/ By definition, "unaccompanied minors" are coming to the US without a parent with them. Try to imagine the magnitude of the threat to your child's life & safety at home that would force you, a loving responsible parent, to send them away in the care of strangers.
5/ After separating children from parents, the new Sessions policy requires #immigration authorities to *designate the children as unaccompanied minors* and process them accordingly.
We are literally ripping them from the arms of loving parents and calling them orphans.
6/ If there are no family members willing or able to take these children, they will be placed in foster care or shelters--even as innocent parents seeking nothing but safety are criminalized and jailed indefinitely as asylum claims are reviewed.
7/ I have always found #ORR to be a responsible, compassionate agency staffed by people truly looking out for the best interests of the children under their care. But the 1,500 unaccounted-for kids are their responsibility. This travesty (for once) has nothing to do with #ICE.
8/ Unaccompanied minors have special protections per 2008 law & may be eligible for #SpecialImmigrantJuvenile visas.
Sessions and the nativist right loath these protections & want them gone.
#WhereAreTheChildren could be the excuse they've been looking for. Don't let it be.
9/ VERY IMPORTANT FOOTNOTE:
The # of unaccounted-for kids reported comes from data collected from a *new policy* which follows up w/sponsors not in place until very recently.
But HHS has had this responsibility for 16+ years.
11/ IMPORTANT: A lot of pushback to the idea that the Obama administration could have had anything to do with #WhereAreTheChildren. When I say that Obamacreated these conditions during the 2013-2015 "surge" of migrant children, this is the kind of thing I'm talking about.
12/ #WhereAreTheChildren predates Trump, and putting it all on him gets us nowhere. This 2016 AP investigation raised same questions & went almost entirely unnoticed. I wish it were as simple as ending one truly horrific presidency, but it's just not.
1/ One of the worst parts of the proposed new DHS "public charge" rule would resurrect a 400-yr-old idea, punish lower-income immigrants, AND deliver a massive new giveaway to Wall Street.
Not seeing much out there on this piece right now, so here's what you need to know:
2/ The idea of a "public charge bond" goes back to the earliest colonial days. If someone coming over from Europe didn't seem like they would be able to support themselves, the ship's captain would have to put up a given amount of money to keep them off the dole or take them back
3/ As part of the "Passenger Cases," SCOTUS struck down the city of Boston's attempt to collect public charge bonds from ship captains as unconstitutional in 1849, finding that only the federal government had this kind of power. But it didn't actually exercise it until 1882.
Not, like, step-by-step but generally what are the paths available under current law. If the answer is any variation on "get in line like everybody else," an automatic 6-month bar on any immigration rhetoric/legislation until finishing a mandatory US Immigration 101 course.
If you or your staff are not willing to take the time to understand the system we have, there is no place at the table for you in working toward a new one. None.
1/ Ten years ago this June a recent immigrant was sentenced to life for the vicious, violent, cold-blooded murder of his wife and infant daughter before trying to flee to his home country.
--@bostonherald didn't run an angry editorial blaming our imm. vetting processes
--No one used this tragedy to call for an end to all British immigration
--The media never used a booking photo; always images like this one to remind us of his wealth & whiteness
3/ Neil Entwistle shot his wife in the head, and then his infant daughter in the stomach as she lay sleeping in her mother's arms. He then withdrew every dollar they had and fled to London. Mass state troopers grabbed him on a tube platform.
If you're ever up for listening in on what your local Deep State is up to, may I recommend one of my favorite eateries in #Boston: the cafe in the JFK fed. building. Decent, reasonably-priced food with a nice view and plenty of space to relax while waiting for #immigrationcourt
1/ Two VA managers are having a lunch meeting nearby, talking through how to deliver faster/better services to a 94-year-old veteran & review implementation of a new process.
A USCIS officer is having a quick salad before another round of immigration interviews. In + out in 10
2/ Friends, this is your actual "Deep State."
Career public servants who take pride in keeping their agencies on mission and making the best use of tax dollars doing it, no matter the President or policies. Dedication, commitment, and institutional knowledge. We can't lose them.
Maybe *not* have a rogue, unaccountable, armed secret police force & threat of indefinite detention in a disgusting American gulag archipelago terrorizing immigrant communities in the name of enforcing civil immigration orders
BUT WE HAVE TO HAVE IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT
Coordinated internal immigration enforcement is a very new idea in US history. But apart from that: we've only been doing it this way for 15 years. If you are doing anything to make this model inevitable, you're on the wrong side
1/ Live-tweeting from the Boston immigration court's detained docket:
Detainee is on video. I can't see his face but he has a heavy Massachusetts accent--you'd never know he wasn't born here. He is seeking bond.
2/ He has a series of drug-related convictions together with a record consistent with an addiction. Judge leaves his bond at "no bond" without hearing from him.
3/ Like most people on the detained docket, he doesn't have and can't afford a lawyer. (No appointed counsel here.) He is now speaking for himself.