@LarrySchweikart 1) You guys need to re-read the executive summary, cause your getting it WRONG. When it talks about "no political bias", it is specifically in regards to COMEY. It is saying that, for THIS investigation, they didn't find evidence of bias by Comey, BUT...
@LarrySchweikart 2) ...they found that Comey was EXTREMELY insubordinate and incompetent in his actions in handling the Clinton email investigation.
In terms of indictments it means this:
There isn't evidence to prove Comey was Seditious, but the areas were he was insubordinate he CAN be punished
@LarrySchweikart 3) So they didn't find Comey to have bias... BUT
It DID find that STRZOK and other FBI agents showed political bias that negatively impacted multiple investigations.
As a result the OIG is referring these agents for FURTHER investigations...
@LarrySchweikart 4) ...Which leads to another point:
THIS 👏IS 👏NOT 👏THE 👏ONLY 👏INVESTIGATION 👏
The results from this specific investigation don't take into account other investigations that Comey, Strzok, and others are implicated in.
And yes, the Clinton Email Investigation was REOPENED.
@LarrySchweikart 5) You know where all these reports are going?
They go directly to Huber, Jeff Sessions' chosen prosecutor.
It's his job to piece ALL of the investigations together to form the whole story.
Horowitz is essentially serving as the evidence gatherer. Nothing more.
@LarrySchweikart 6) Finally, by exposing and documenting Comey's improper behavior as FBI director, it completely vindicates #POTUSTrump in his decision to fire him. If Comey pipes up about this, Trump can take this 500 page report and slap it across his face!
@LarrySchweikart 7) So boot up the OIG report and re-read it, CAREFULLY this time, so you know what it's actually saying instead of screaming like its the end of the world.
This report is not the end, and we have barely scratched the surface of this scandal.
@LarrySchweikart ADDENDUM: 8) In regards to the disconnect between the damning evidence in the body of the work and the executive summary statement of "no political bias" @SentinelVI has a great take on why:
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @SentinelVI view original on Twitter
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
With Ellison now running & the the DFL turning on each other to nominate the far-left Murphy, the Dems are going all-in to turn MN into the next CA...
BUT
...Trump was less than 1.5% from winning MN, and the GOP already controls the legislature. Momentum is on our side!
Coming from an inner-city district where Dems have a monopoly, Ellison has never had to even step foot outside Minneapolis.
The rest of us here, though, will NOT allow a Jihadist-loving Jew-hater like Ellison to trample on us!
2) I'll give you a synopsis of the two worst ones I've seen from my classmates:
The first one is about a homeless woman who lives in her van.
At night, she trespasses public property after closing hours to use the showers and bathrooms.
3) One evening she steals a newspaper with a job listing that she desires, while a security camera records her.
She heads to the parking garage where her van is parked, enters the van, and skims over the listing.
At this point, a cop arrives, who had seen her steal the paper.