Some of you know about the Decolonising Science Reading List, which is a (slightly out of date) list of books & articles that I've read part or all of that challenge dominant narratives in and about STEM. It's relevant to the family separation discussion. medium.com/@chanda/decolo…
Part of the underlying logic of American immigration policy is that certain types of immigrants are good because of their level of education and their cultural context and other kinds of immigrants are bad. In the case of Central Americans, many of them are Indigenous.
Part of the logic of the specific internment/deterrence policy toward Central Americans is the idea that they are not bringing added value to US. First of all, fuck the idea that people are capital. Second of all, fuck the idea that Indigenous culture isn't inherently valuable.
Third of all, fuck the idea that undocumented people don't pay oodles in taxes in addition to helping to grow the economy, therefore providing added value to the US, because actually they do.
But I want to highlight the fundamental point that people with proximity to indigeneity are somehow a danger to American culture and society because of the believe that indigeneity is anti-modern and primitive. This logic applies to Africans as well as ppl of the Americas, btw.
The American establishment keeps insinuating that Central American immigrants are a cultural danger because they are culturally inferior. The reason I want to highlight this? A lot of "good liberals" believe this. You don't think you do, but you do.
Many folks believe that Africans, Indigenous Americans, &some Asians need to be "developed" so that they too can have "modern technology and science." I mention the Decolonising Science Reading List bc it contains what you need to disabuse yourself of these colonial notions.
A lot of folks believe that Europeans just happened to be "scientifically superior" when actually they were just more violent, expansionist, DISEASED, and in a position to collate technical and scientific information from around the world.
Ever read about the history of botanical gardens? They weren't just places for you to have your wedding and enjoy a neat book. They were where Europeans collected plants that they had taken from other places and studied them, often using help from indigenous knowledge.
So it's easy to yell at Trump and Republicans and people who openly support white supremacist policy but what kind of educational policies do you support? What do you know about the history of STEM? What does it teach you about indigenous cultures, including Black ones?
Does it teach you to talk about the Maya as culturally inferior, as the chair of Harvard Astro did in the pages of Nature a few years ago? Or to joke about them all being dead, as Neil de Grasse Tyson did a few years ago? Bc many of the people being interned, are in fact, Mayan.
Now is a good time to unpack your internalized colonial ideas about history, about whether Native Americans are frozen in time (it's a fucking ridiculous thought but over and over people seem to hold onto it), about whether Black people were savages until slavery civilized us
I know you're like, "I never thought Black people were savages or that slavery civilized you" but certainly many people think that Black people would have no STEM intellectual history if it weren't for Europeans, and basically that's the same idea.
Anyway, here's an example of a book that I haven't taken the time to add to the list but is highly relevant to our contemporary understanding of botany and pharmaceutical history amazon.com/Science-Coloni…
Returning to the Maya for a second: folks could probably learn a bunch from them about how the fuck to survive slavery, colonialism, fascism, civil wars with death squads, volcanoes, landslides etc. Because in the last 500 years, they have seen it all. And they are still here.
Speaking of surviving slavery, colonialism, fascism, civil wars, volcanoes, landslides, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, Happy Juneteenth, to all my Black people out there. We made it to 2018, despite them. #Juneteenth2018
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Students of color feeling marginalized in STEM are not always people in need of remedial programming and assuming they need remedial programming is really problematic/hella racist
Learn to talk about people of color like we're the same species as you
Now that I have a moment to expand on this: what I said to the room where this was said today is that white people are the majority of people on welfare. It’s important to know the difference between majority and disproportional. Minorities are disproportionately poor, yes.
Tomorrow and Tuesday I’m attending the #astro2020 decadal early career researchers workshop and as part of the requirements to attend, I had to read about 200 pages of (publicly available) documentation relating to the last decadal. I learned some things!
1. Apparently the NASA budget doubled between 1988 and 1991
2. The National Research Council *is* part of the National Academies (which are charged by law to produce a decadal survey in the various earth and space sciences every 10 years)
There is seriously a thread of white women in my mentions very committed to denying white women's complicity in white supremacy, in response to a tweet from a Black Lives Matter organizer who has, you know, thought about this for longer than 5 minutes
When I pointed out to one of them that she was a repeat offender, she said I had cyberbullied her when calling her out on something I saw her do last year by letting folks know that her response to me was condescending and privileged
When I pointed out she had shown up in my mentions today, she deleted her tweet and didn't apologize for acting like I was the aggressor. Now every time I think the thread has died, another white woman steps in to wake it up again. Almost all of them are scientists.
"We write here first to state, in the strongest possible terms, that the humanity of any person, regardless of ascribed identities such as race, ethnicity, gender identity, religion, disability, gender presentation, or sexual identity is not up for debate."
"Belittling the ability and legitimacy of scientists of color and white women scientists using such flimsy pretexts is disgraceful, and it reveals a deep contempt for more than half of humanity that clearly comes from some source other than scientific logic."
Thing I felt grateful for today: as a child of divorce and an international activist family, I spent a lot of time on planes and sometimes in passport offices alone, and along the way, many adults took an interest and talked to me and this meant I never felt alone or scared
Props to the woman at the passport office who enjoyed my diatribe about Jane Austen and later mailed me an old BBC adaptation that I hadn’t seen. Btw turns out a 13 yo needs a parent present to renew a passport, much to my dad’s chagrine lol
And to the many business travelers who, rather than wondering what the hell I was doing in business class (where the flight attendants often put unaccompanied minors back then), played cards with me and talked to me about my dolls.
This tweet 👇🏽 is flat out wrong. Speaking as someone who does gender studies in addition to particle physics — gender studies is actually a notoriously difficult field to get published in, harder than physics actually, and only a few journals are really taken seriously.
It was actually easier for me to get a peer-reviewed paper on gender studies published in an astronomy journal than to get one published in a gender studies journal. I’ve now been successful in both. Let the critics say the same. ;-)
One piece of advice I got from a senior woman in science, technology and society studies who does race & gender in technology history was that gender studies is a very hard field and I should be careful. Her husband is a string theorist, so I think she knows what she’s saying. 😉