Artifacts in a nutshell 👽👾

A Tweetorial...
Dedicated to @bcostelloMD, @RezaEmaminia & all the great #FITs stressed out by #EchoBoards @ASE360 #carrotsquad
Images and some of the content from Bertrand, et al. JASE 2016;29:381-91. onlinejase.com/article/S0894-…
Ultrasound waves need a media to travel. Our tissues are that media. All tissues have different acoustic impedances. Air, fat, water, blood, muscle, bone listed in increasing impedance. Always there will be reflected & refracted waves as it traverses different tissue layers.
Remember that the way the US distributes the waves in a phased array probe is similar to a folding fan, so reflection (rebound) & refraction (change in direction) occurs across the sector width (Triangle area where you see the images) look at panel B of above figure.
The gel decreases the impedance of the skin, so the US waves can travel back & forth adequately.
Reverberation=strong reflector (calcified stuff, scar, collagenous structure, pericardium, etc) reflects some US waves back to the probe material, and rebounds again. This is registered as posterior echogenicity(-ies). Distance ratio is preserved.
Mirror artifact is a super “reverberation” a large strong reflector, typically the pericardium, causes duplication of a large structure of the heart & typically the artifact (👽) would be posterior to that large reflector. Expect to see mirror images.
Refraction= are you seeing double?? There will be a tissue that can behave as a lens & redirect part of the waves as a double image. it can obscure the structures of interest. Change the imaging plane to avoid the “lens”. Don’t confuse with mirroring
Side lobe. Nope, not all artifacts are side lobes!!! Look for a linear “arc-like” structure.Careful to confuse it with dissection or thrombus.Because it occurs when moving probe in radial direction, one of the key findings is that the artifact will traverse chambers & structures
Another that sounds complicated, but is easy. Beam width is just that, limited plane of interrogation. The elevation component of the beam might register flows or structures out of plane. You just need to change your plane to explain from where the 👽 is coming from.
Near field clutter is classically the “pseudo thrombus” in an well contracting apex. Can give you a headache in pts with low LVEF or akinetic apex. High frequency oscillations in the “Fresnel” very close to transducer are guilty of that. If in doubt, color Doppler or contrast.
Expect multiple artifacts from prosthetic devices. Sometimes combination of TTE & TEE assessments are necessary to sort things out. They have high acoustic impedances as you would expect. Nice examples below. The amplatzer devices 👽 can be kaleidoscopic.😆
TEE artifacts can be quite scary, but after omniplaning it’s relieving to see that they are 👽. In the aorta if you see a linear structure, see if you see that line outside the aorta, use color Doppler to see if there is turbulence or difference in color Doppler in flows.
A lot of this artifacts (👽) can be improved with lowering the gain. Below tables are very useful for your boards.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Juan Lopez-Mattei, MD

Juan Lopez-Mattei, MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @onco_cardiology

Aug 20, 2018
Evaluation of Cardiac Masses:
A Tweetorial for #FITSurvivalGuide 🚨 #ACCImaging @ASE360 @SCMR @journalofCMR @ACCinTouch
Dedicated:@dr_chirumamilla & all #ACCFIT in #CardioTwitter
Main Ref: link.springer.com/article/10.100… Palaskas, et al. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med (2018) 20: 29.
Usually, it all starts with an abnormal finding in an echo suggestive of intracavitary mass. How can we tell one from the other? It can be confusing.
For artifacts, I did a Tweetorial already that describes the most common ones. Basic understanding of ultrasound physics is needed to be able to explain them: twitter.com/i/moments/1030…
Read 24 tweets
Jun 26, 2018
#ASE2018 @ASE360 Evaluation of Cardiac Masses by me😂🥕❤️☄️
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(