DawsonSField Profile picture
Jul 4, 2018 24 tweets 9 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1. Ah, the Senate Intelligence Committee report on Obama's Intelligence Community Assessment. They excluded 14 IC agencies due to the sensitivity of the sources & methods. Like concealing the fact that Steele, through multiple channels was the only source. scribd.com/document/38314…
2. I'm quite certain they met Obama's tasking objectives! But the HPSCI already showed they did not follow analytical procedures. As they state, they took the agencies' word on that the intelligence was accurately portrayed in the ICA. We'll see!
3. You don't have to politically pressure people to reach a conclusion when they hand selected a team who would do so without pressure. Such as Peter Strzok who lead the FBI team. Especially if you also select what intelligence reporting you are going to consider & what to ignore
4. Of course Russia wants to sow trouble with US politics. Just as we try to do the same to them. Their efforts may have been more significant & direct than past efforts, but that was also a reflection that they had no fear of Obama stopping them or retaliating.
5. It's funny how the CIA ignores open source information when it doesn't suit their goals, and laps it up when it does. If Putin really wanted to support Trump, would he say it publicly? Of course not, but analysts can choose to believe the disinformation when they need it.
6. To buy that, you must believe that Putin thought Trump capable of winning the election. As the clumsy efforts by their FB team show, they weren't that swift on American politics. There is no plausible way Putin thought Trump would win, heck few in the USA believed it.
7. This ignores the much more plausible scenario. That Putin, like everyone else, assumed Hillary was going to win. But wanted to make sure she was damaged goods. Dealing with Trump fans posting #NotMyPresident W/ questions about rigging the election, continuing weak Obama's...
8. foreign policy that allowed Russia to pretend it was superpower again, susceptible to black mail by whoever stole her emails, under investigation by a Republican Congress, & a WH focused on obstructing investigations & avoiding impeachment. With little time left to stop Putin.
9. Yes, crime of the century. So important that the FBI/CIA didn't even want to get their hands on the server to get the evidence that would prove or disprove it. Relied upon a DNC vendor as the only forensic evidence to prove this is what happened. It also fails to explain why..
10. The Russians were allowed to continue that access for 11 months. Especially when the FBI started warning the DNC about the cyber intrusion in the fall of 2015. Why allow the Russians 9 months of access after they are notified of the intrusion?
11. Isn't Radio Free Europe a quasi-governmental controlled influence campaign? Just wondering, because that was the goal of RFE & similar information networks. How about NPR & PBS? That doesn't even get into MSM outlets who serve as a platform for Obama Admin & DNC propaganda.
12. Duh! Of course they did & so did we. Heck we even do it to our allies. Can they show any evidence that Russia did more than the CIA did to France? wikileaks.org/cia-france-ele…
We did far more in the Israeli elections to get help defeat Israeli politicians who didn't support Obama's policies of siding with the terrorists as a means of achieving peace. latimes.com/nation/la-na-u…
14. Well there is a reason the ICA didn't address the CI investigations of placing spies in the Trump campaign. They knew the spies were FBI/CIA/MI6 plants. We also know that the claim that the Steele Dossier was not used in the ICA is absolutely false. It was used, then hidden.
It also fails to address the intelligence laundering. Steele's information was laundered to hide its sourcing. So he gave his dossier to State, MI6, GCHQ, FBI, each which would then conceal the sources & methods & share. Which hid the fact that 4 reports all had the same source.
16. On to some of those obvious lies. Brennan testified to Congress 05/17 that the dossier was in no way used for the ICA. Adm. Rogers of NSA sent a classified letter to @DevinNunes stating that it was used in the ICA. So the SSCI contradicts Adm. Rogers assertions to HPSCI.
17. For a great summary on games played to reach the questionable conclusions of the ICA, there is a great article at: realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/…
18. The ICA also did not consider another motive for Putin's interference in the 2016 election. Like revenge against @realDonaldTrump. Now why would Putin want to get back at him? Well, what Putin knew pretending to like Putin was all part of an FBI undercover operation?
19. The FBI ran an interesting counterintelligence operation to catch Russian spies. In 2014, they started a sting using a wealthy Atlantic City casino investor pretending he was colluding w/ Russian spies & bankers to get their help violating sanctions to open a casino in Russia
20. That FBI Wealthy Casino Investor Russia Collusion sting sounds a lot like the Trump Russia Collusion narrative. And look there, the undercover agent used as a 'dangle' earlier in the same case was Carter Page. Wonder if someone spied on that FBI op? abcnews.go.com/International/…
21. It's so weird how this FBI sting looks exactly like Collusion! A Manhattan based Russian bank Trump is accused of colluding with. Tours of casinos in AC, it sounds exactly like the Sater/Cohen emails about wanting to build a casino in Russia. justice.gov/sites/default/…
22. So what do you think the odds are that a 20-year FBI informant like Felix Sater, was illegally running a casino collusion campaign in NYC & AC. While at the same time another FBI informant was running an identical undercover casino collusion sting on the exact same Russians?
23. Hard to believe in that kind of coincidence. Guess maybe that means the FBI casino collusion sting & the Trump Russian Collusion were actually the same operation. Huh, wonder who would sabotage a major FBI operation against Putin to try & use it against Trump in the campaign?
24. I think we know who didn't sabotage it: FBI Director of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap. He started the operation when he was head of FBI NY CI. Weird how he is the only senior FBI official who is still in the job he held before that FBI case was outed & framed as collusion

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with DawsonSField

DawsonSField Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DawsonSField

Oct 8, 2018
Seems the New Yorker had a panel about Trump Inc. this weekend, including Felix Sater. At one time he was the Democrats prime suspect in Russian collusion, until they realized he was an undercover asset. He worked for FBI, DIA, & CIA! One of Trump's many employee FBI assets.
Buzzfeed did a pretty good article on Sater about 6 months ago. The links in that article are even more valuable as they go to specific operations & documents that show Sater's activity. Like spying on North Korea's nuclear supply chain. buzzfeednews.com/article/anthon…
And that is just the operations the DOJ admits to! All while working for Trump to line up mobsters & Russian spies who kept getting indicted!
Read 11 tweets
Oct 4, 2018
Not what I was hoping for but it looks like some more interesting breadcrumbs. More GRU hacking incidents & targets, many related to Olympic doping test facilities & the chemical weapons labs testing samples from UK & Syria. justice.gov/opa/documents-…
Of biggest interest to me is the hacking of Westinghouse Electric, nuclear fuel supplier to Ukraine & other countries. The prosecutors were unwilling to discuss anything not spelled out in the indictment, which means not much. Two main priorities seem likely for the Russians.
Westinghouse was expanding Ukrainian nuclear power capacity. So 1 priority could have been to keep Ukraine dependent on Russian oil & natural gas to allow the Russians to exert leverage over them. So disrupting that relationship or operation may have been a Russian focus.
Read 21 tweets
Sep 26, 2018
Josoph Mifsud's lawyer has written a cease & desist letter to @ScottMStedman. In it, Stephan Roh makes a couple of interesting claims. Starting with denying his role as a 'Russian agent' & making clear intent to sue for that false & defamatory allegation. #Spygate
@ScottMStedman Even more interesting is his claim that Joseph Mifsud is a Western intelligence agent & was directed by that agency (believed to be MI6) to introduce @GeorgePapa19 to a Russian. He has also been directed to remain quiet about the incident at this time!
@ScottMStedman @GeorgePapa19 Stedman has a thread about it but believes it is another Russian plot by Stephan Roh. He has no clue, the plot was to frame Pdop for contacts w/ Western intel agents pretending to be Russian agents. Agents were outed by Dems when they found no Russians.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 21, 2018
How blind can folks be, this is all you need to know! Rosenstein said all this to McCabe, knowing that someone was already secretly recording the President in the WH. RR was setting up McCabe, & McCabe took the bait writing the memos as blackmail material. cnbc.com/2018/09/21/ros…
Remember what I've said the purpose of the slow roll out is? To get the conspirators on the record under oath telling their lies, reveal a little evidence & force them to change their stories. It then requires them to produce evidence (like McCabe's memos) to back their new lies.
Each round of sunlight, causes another alibi to be destroyed. And so far, the conspirators have been forced to reveal new incriminating evidence first to try & get their spin out first. They can't wait for the declassifications, the unredactions, they have to confess & spin.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 19, 2018
ABC claiming the FBI started a Counterintelligence Investigation of @carterwpage in January 2016, also claiming that is when he joined the Trump Campaign. Both conflict with past information. They don't mention that Page provided the bugs to catch the Russian spies.
@carterwpage Steele, on the payroll of Putin's Oligarch Oleg Deripaska, contacted Bruce Ohr, who was providing tips on US DOJ actions against reputed Mobster Oleg Deripaska to Steele. Winer was for many years a FARA registered agent for Russian corporate interests.
Read 9 tweets
Sep 19, 2018
Seems everyone in the press knew Peter Strzok was removed from the SC team by 8/16/17.
Seems the @NYT knew that Greg Craig was a focus of the Manafort investigation on 9/7/17. Interesting.
Now this is an interesting string of rumors the press heard. That an agent quit the SC team & filed an affidavit against Andrew Weissman for leaking grand jury info to AP! That meeting, if there was only one, was before the Special Counsel was appointed.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(