In the last thread I pointed out that the Amesbury tragedy, and the Skripal poisoning had many clues which pointed to Fentanyl overdose being the culprit rather than Novochok.
6/ This again matches with Fentanyl overdose which is said to take seconds to minutes.
Note the reference to Fentanyl being mixed with heroin by dealers. It seems likely that's this is what happened. Some dealer mistook micrograms for milligrams, & it cost Dawn Sturgess her life
7/ Fentanyl fits all the symptoms.
It explains why the policeman who gave the Skripals mouth to mouth didn't die.
It explains why Sam Hobson who was with the Amesbury couple didn't die.
It explains why the initial diagnosis in both cases WAS Fentanyl.
So why claim Novichok?
8/ The local paper reported the symptoms of Novichok poisoning as:
9/ These don't match the description given of the Amesbury tragedy.
While the Police are looking for an exotic Russian toxin, a man has been found dead in local woods. The Sun article says that dealers left stashes in parks and crack hangouts. Another Fentanyl victim?
10/ So how did we get from the initial report of two victims from contaminated drugs, to an international incident?
About the same time that the incident was taken over by anti-terrorism Police.
Ironically it seems to be them that have caused the terror. But for what reason?
11/ (edit)
The Sun also report that Dawn's son said:
"They said she had the same symptoms as the Skripals, including foaming at the mouth. Things are worse for mum though as they said the Skripals didn’t have heart attacks.”
Foaming is a Fentanyl symptom, not a Novichok one.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ I've been busy so forgive me if these points have been made better elsewhere. This is crazy.
The Police have provided us with some CCTV images and claimed timings for the #doorknobdesperados, just as they previously did with Sergei Skripal's movements.
There's a problem.
3/ The problem is fairly fundamental:
It doesn't appear that Sergei, or Julia, even had an opportunity to touch their own doorknob!
From the original Police timeline here: news.met.police.uk/news/renewed-a… we see that Skripal was headed out of town in his BMW at 09:15
1/ Mueller has gone on a Phishing trip, and like most anglers likes to boast about the size of the big one. But there's no evidence of the catch, not even how he reeled them in. We are expected to take his word that "It was *this* big".
2/ I have a *long* standing project in the works looking at Guccifer2.0's documents which is proving to be more than interesting. It should settle it once and for all.
But in the meantime I'd like to look at a few aspects of the new indictment that do not compute.
3/ What Mueller appears to have done is to pick some names that he claims are hackers from "Unit 26165" and "Unit 74455" and claim they hacked the DNC & DCCC. We have no way of knowing if they did, he presents no evidence of *how* they claim to *know* it was these people.
1/ You must read the superb series of articles on Amesbury and Skripal written by Rob Slane at the Blogmire. He leaves no doubt that the government has got it wrong
THREAD on Guccifer 1.0. and the Clinton Server. 1/
The awesome @tracybeanz has done some awesome research on timings and co-incidences about Marcel Lazar's (Guccifer1.0) hacking, and timeline meshing with the Page/Strozk texts. Go Read It.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @tracybeanz view original on Twitter
2/ There's a 2017 story by Fox news about Lazar. We see something very interesting: he handed over 70 Gb of data to the FBI, which Fox say is equivalent to 1.75 million pages to the FBI of text. foxnews.com/politics/2017/…
But Fox are missing one vital detail.
3/ Lazar initially claimed he *had* hacked the Clinton server, and it was *easy*, he later retracted that statement (being in Jail would make you do that). The FBI add that there is no "evidence" he hacked the server.
1/ A thread on the curious tale of dcleaks.com. To which I have no firm answers, just some anomalies and leads I'd like to share.
2/ The spooks are sure about dcleaks in 2017:
dcleaks.com and Guccifer2.0 were named with "High Confidence" as key outlets for stolen DNC data in the 6th January 2017 Intelligence Community reports on Russian interference.
FBI's Priestep testified a direct link
3/ But by 2018 the DNC forgets all about them:
In the recent *DNC Vs Everybody* lawfare suit dcleaks.com is curiously absent. Why is that?
G2.0. is helped along by a conveniently timed article in the Daily Beast. Their parent company is directed by Ms C Clinton