Being a scientist requires extraordinary patience. We keep pecking away at dark matter, even though we still haven’t seen it after decades of searching. #ICHEP2018
And nowwwww: axion searches. I was sad to miss the session on this because it was at the same time was my talk about axion theory 😩 #ICHEP2018
For when your kid asks, “where do axions come from?” You can say, “QCD” :-) #ICHEP2018
This is a log-log plot, folks. The range is huge! #ICHEP2018
People often incorrectly believe that the axion’s only standard model coupling is electromagnetic but actually there is a fermion coupling that is of interest. #ICHEP2018
Related, most experiments are using magnetic fields for direct detection. (Unrelated: oh my god, experiment is hard. I’m glad to be a theorist.) #ICHEP2018
Lol my UW colleague Gray Rybka just asked Yannis how long before we find the axion LMAO #ichep2018
Our next speaker Martin Drees will talk about dark matter theory. Trivia: he got married at our conference venue 17 years ago. #ICHEP2018
This is important: dark matter is actually transparent, not dark! Calling it dark matter is bad physics, basically. #ICHEP2018
On the list of reasons why Black people and dark matter are terrible analogs: Black people are not transparent. If we were, it would be harder for police to shoot us constantly. But I digress.
Zwicky first guessed that galaxy clusters were mostly made of non-visible matter and called it dark matter in 1933. Vera Rubin provided first verification in the 60s. #ICHEP2018
Galaxy cluster observations aren’t only data that require presence of another type of matter. cosmic microwave background radiation data also requires it or else data and models are not consistent. #ICHEP2018
CMB is affirmed by Big Bang nucleosynthesis data. #ICHEP2018
Great to see acknowledgement of modified gravity in this talk, as an alternative to dark matter, not because I think it’s correct but because we still don’t know for sure what’s going on and this is the right, scientific approach #ICHEP2018
And now, a curvature-based explanation: black holes! LIGO saw an unexpected number of stellar mass BHs. But it’s hard to get the primordial black hole mass spectrum right. #ICHEP2018
Claim: primordial black holes need fine tuning.
Me: don’t all dark matter candidates? 😬😩 #ICHEP2018
Dark matter’s physical movement is significantly altered by its lack of light emission — it can’t get rid of energy the way everything else does, by emitting photons. (We emit photons, fellow mammals! Night goggles can see them.) #ICHEP2018
Why am I the only one giggling about him saying “astrophysics is really just physics 101”? I mean, I hear what he’s saying but lolol #ICHEP2018
The slide ^ is important because those are the constraints that guide how theorists do their dark matter model building. I’m building a model right now and we have to take these things into account. #ICHEP2018
I wish people liked my physics tweets as much as they like my tweets about racism 😩😢
Take home: dark matter is real.
MAYBE? WE HOPE? I’m a freaked out junior professor lol
(Public health wife tangential: it seems many #ICHEP2018 participants also got a cold. Someone got the rest of us sick!! <shakes fist>)
And now a talk which is going to mention the ... cursed? ... B-modes #ICHEP2018
Cosmic microwave background astronomy is a precision science like high energy particle physics #ICHEP2018
This cosmology equation is typically the first one a young cosmologist derives. I first derived it as part of a homework problem for a class taught by Avi Loeb in 2002.
Pretty good summary of our understanding of inflation. What this slide doesn’t say is that inflation was invented by Alan Guth WHO IS THE AWESOMEST. #ICHEP2018
This ain’t like no other polar bear you’ve ever seen #ICHEP2018 (tangentially: Sharon Traweek discusses particle physicist proclivity to give things f/punny names in her anthropological study Beamtimes and Lifetimes)
Effectively where we are with CMB power spectrum measurements #ICHEP2018
Students of color feeling marginalized in STEM are not always people in need of remedial programming and assuming they need remedial programming is really problematic/hella racist
Learn to talk about people of color like we're the same species as you
Now that I have a moment to expand on this: what I said to the room where this was said today is that white people are the majority of people on welfare. It’s important to know the difference between majority and disproportional. Minorities are disproportionately poor, yes.
Tomorrow and Tuesday I’m attending the #astro2020 decadal early career researchers workshop and as part of the requirements to attend, I had to read about 200 pages of (publicly available) documentation relating to the last decadal. I learned some things!
1. Apparently the NASA budget doubled between 1988 and 1991
2. The National Research Council *is* part of the National Academies (which are charged by law to produce a decadal survey in the various earth and space sciences every 10 years)
There is seriously a thread of white women in my mentions very committed to denying white women's complicity in white supremacy, in response to a tweet from a Black Lives Matter organizer who has, you know, thought about this for longer than 5 minutes
When I pointed out to one of them that she was a repeat offender, she said I had cyberbullied her when calling her out on something I saw her do last year by letting folks know that her response to me was condescending and privileged
When I pointed out she had shown up in my mentions today, she deleted her tweet and didn't apologize for acting like I was the aggressor. Now every time I think the thread has died, another white woman steps in to wake it up again. Almost all of them are scientists.
"We write here first to state, in the strongest possible terms, that the humanity of any person, regardless of ascribed identities such as race, ethnicity, gender identity, religion, disability, gender presentation, or sexual identity is not up for debate."
"Belittling the ability and legitimacy of scientists of color and white women scientists using such flimsy pretexts is disgraceful, and it reveals a deep contempt for more than half of humanity that clearly comes from some source other than scientific logic."
Thing I felt grateful for today: as a child of divorce and an international activist family, I spent a lot of time on planes and sometimes in passport offices alone, and along the way, many adults took an interest and talked to me and this meant I never felt alone or scared
Props to the woman at the passport office who enjoyed my diatribe about Jane Austen and later mailed me an old BBC adaptation that I hadn’t seen. Btw turns out a 13 yo needs a parent present to renew a passport, much to my dad’s chagrine lol
And to the many business travelers who, rather than wondering what the hell I was doing in business class (where the flight attendants often put unaccompanied minors back then), played cards with me and talked to me about my dolls.
This tweet 👇🏽 is flat out wrong. Speaking as someone who does gender studies in addition to particle physics — gender studies is actually a notoriously difficult field to get published in, harder than physics actually, and only a few journals are really taken seriously.
It was actually easier for me to get a peer-reviewed paper on gender studies published in an astronomy journal than to get one published in a gender studies journal. I’ve now been successful in both. Let the critics say the same. ;-)
One piece of advice I got from a senior woman in science, technology and society studies who does race & gender in technology history was that gender studies is a very hard field and I should be careful. Her husband is a string theorist, so I think she knows what she’s saying. 😉