David Homan, MD Profile picture
Jul 12, 2018 14 tweets 19 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1/10 “To PCI, or Not to PCI, That is the Question” Will Shakespeare, MD
*Per many contentious #cardiotwitter discussions I realize this is loaded topic but I’m going to attempt an early stage #ACCFIT overview while recognizing there is a lot of nuance.
2/10 Why not “See lesion Fix lesion”?
Poor correlation between est'd visual stenosis & quantitative stenosis. And, without noninvasive ischemic data, coronary angio has limited accuracy w/ regard to identifying significance of many stenoses
*STEMI PCI already done @KhandelwalMD
3/10 COURAGE trial (OMT vs OMT and PCI of visually-estimated significant stenoses): No difference death/MI between OMT & OMT/PCI. PCI demonstrated clinical benefit only when treating relevant myocardial ischemia determined by noninvasive testing.
4/10 If no non-invasive testing available prior to LHC?
FFR: Ratio of max blood flow in stenotic artery to normal max blood flow (calculate simultaneous ratio distal coronary pressure to aortic pressure: Pd/Pa).
Normal FFR: 1.0 & FFR <0.80 is significant for ischemia.
5/10 DEFER: Prognosis of non-FFR sig vessels is excellent & PCI of non-FFR sig vessels does no benefit

FAME: FFR-guided PCI reduces death, nonfatal MI, repeat revasc compared to angio-guided PCI

FAME 2: PCI for sig FFR reduces death, nonfatal MI, urgent revise compared to OMT
6/10 Instantaneous free-Wave Ratio (iFR) - non inferior to FFR in 2 large randomized trials: DEFINE FLAIR and iFR-Swedeheart
7/10 Real-world case study to try to tie this all together
70yo f smoker w/ htn, HL referred for LHC to eval DOE. ECG/echo nl. ETT stopped 4 min s/t DOE. Lexi SPECT: multi small mild/mod reversible abnormalities: apical anterior, mid inferior, mid anterolateral, inferolateral.
8a/10 how would you treat? (Poll follows angiograms) #RadialFirst @mikevalentineMD @DickKovacs @AAllenSeals @RickChazal @cardio10s @ditchhaporia @bowalpole @HadleyWilsonMD
What would you do next?
9/10 Given multiple small/mod areas of ischemia in multiple territories on SPECT, I opted for choice D. iFR demonstrated no indication for PCI.

dLAD 0.95
dLCx 0.98
dRCA 0.98

*if distal vessel iFR <0.90 I would have done serial lesion analysis to determine exactly where to tx
10/10 Ultimately, you have to do what is best for each pt. Judicious PCI is a must. Fellowship is about honing the decision-making skills to decide when to intervene.

I’m humbled to have been asked to participate w/ #FITSurvivalGuide. Good luck #ACCFIT!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with David Homan, MD

David Homan, MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!