Welcome to topsy-turvy world were the Guardian condems but the Country Squire supports Lesbians. Tarquin Sutherland does have a lovely writing style though. countrysquire.co.uk/2018/07/17/wel…
'look deeply at this canary dropping asphyxiated from its perch, try to see the emerging pattern of behaviour and use that wonderful imagination to extrapolate where all this is inevitably headed'. #GetTheLOut#WarOnWomen
Sutherland questions what is this 'de facto ‘hate speech’. What could this vile message have been? “Lesbian = Female Homosexual”. #WarOnWomen#GetTheLOut
'Postmodernism is like some noxious, virulent bacillus that has overflowed the bounds of it’s petri dish and threatens to consume all that come into contact with it leaving them little more than obsessive sex zombies.' #WarOnWomen#GetTheLOut
I never envisaged a time when it would be @CSquireMagazine championing the rights of lesbians and arguing in favour of feminists, but thank you very much Tarquin Sutherland (@infamousTruscum )
From another one of Tarquin's articles: 'The battle lines, politically-speaking, appear to be the sanity of those that understand we fall outside of the norm, and merely seek societal empathy for the accident of our birth, versus those that seem keen to use the power....
of their ability to CHOOSE to ‘identify’ as transgender as a societal cosh with which they can beat society into a different shape'.
A detailed look at the U.K. Serious Case Review National Repository suggests to me that Susie Green of mermaids is making up statistics and in my opinion behaving unethically and in contradiction with the Samaritan guidelines around suicide.
This has come out of work @AlfredBelpaire has done and privately shared with me. The 'stats' Susie Green and another Mermaids mum are pushing, the sensationalist Guardian article do NOT agree with the research by GIDS of the Tavistock and Portman.
Who sent me this thread? I want to thank you but I can't find the notification.
Sokal squared set about to expose the sophistry and forgery of knowledge in academia, particularly 'grievance studies', and it has been marvellous. I was even dealing with this just this morning (see screen grab).
This is in the comments section below. This Professor Emeritus of Applied Philosophy doesn't think that biological sex is real, that women are disadvantaged by systemic oppression based on biology. It is, frankly, batsh*t.
Prof.'s Stock rebuttal of five common arguments that men are women on their self declaration is beautiful. Proper reasoning and argument has returned to the room!
According to @StopFundingHate talking about women's rights= hateful, speaking about safeguarding= hateful, biology= hateful, speaking of sexism= hateful, women defining themselves= hateful, advertising government consultation= hateful.
I'm starting to suspect @StopFundingHate haven't done the reading.
Are they really going to start a campaign telling women to just be nice? @StopFundingHate
Jess is under the impression that women, and some men, meeting to discuss potential legislative changes is against UK law and council policies. Jess may have confused her anti-women feelings with actual legislation.
This is a personal favourite, Jess celebrating denying women their lawful rights by screaming 'mine' like a toddler. Thanks Jess, this really made me laugh.
There is a long heritage of women like Jess. Julia Bush has written a fantastic article on the women of the Anti-suffrage league bl.uk/votes-for-wome…
Thread. I am very worried that the Girl Guides is creating an institution and climate which is conducive to abuse.
Those who wish to access victims will exploit situations and put themselves in positions where they are surrounded by children. It is why paedophiles entered the Catholic Church, sports coaching, gymnastics coaching, children’s hospitals and homes.
One is not going to get much access to children while working on an oil rig.