Re: today's events:
In February, Mueller released information clarifying how and why #Putin desperately wanted to stop #HillaryClinton from being elected.
Trump, Bernie Sanders, and Jill Stein were helped by Russian election interference vox.com/policy-and-pol…
In #Helsinki, #Putin stated directly that he worked to elect Trump. His intent was to stop #HillaryClinton. He tried to effectuate that during the primary by targeting Sanders supporters. Putin could not sway non-white voters despite his broad disinformation campaign against HRC.
But even though #Putin was unable to win the primary, he WAS able to plant the seeds of disinformation quite strongly. That included the parroting of #HillaryClinton being "corrupt," which Sanders and Trump had hammered (without evidence) repeatedly. (Details are in the report.)
In addition, #Putin pushed the "revolution" concept to promote Jill Stein. "The two-party system is corrupt, both parties are the same, only revolution will bring change."A handful of celebrities helped push this message.
Again, non-white voters were 90% unswayed by the message.
Last week it was revealed that Jill Stein took millions of dollars from distraught voters putatively to pay for a recount in PA, WI and MI which is actually paying for her defense in the Mueller probe.
There were never any recounts.
Today @SecNielsen claimed there was no evidence that #Russia, at #Putin's direction, attacked the U.S. election in 2016.
There were volumes of evidence, both classified and redacted for unclassified viewing in the @ODNIgov report.
The #DNI report details how Sanders supporters were wooed with disinformation about #HillaryClinton--disinformation we all saw repeatedly on Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram.
It was compelling & many reporters tried refuting it, but unwittingly, Sanders promulgated it.
One question raised by #TadDevine's total influence over Sanders is why Devine advised Sanders to remain in the primary not just after he lost resoundingly, but for 2mos after it officially ended and even after Obama asked him to withdraw and unite with Hillary against Trump.
Was #TadDevine promised that the intel #Russia was alleging it had on #HillaryClinton would allow Sanders to become nominee? Jane Sanders famously urged the FBI to "hurry up" with their investigation of Clinton(which had actually ended).
Was Devine expecting to install Sanders?
Trump didn't make his public call to #Russia to hack #HillaryClinton's emails until July 27, 2016---during the Democratic convention. But #Russia acted that day.
Was Devine still hoping for a last minute switch at the convention?
These q's may or may not be answered by Mueller.
None of which implicates Sanders. Whatever Tad Devine knew or didn't, it doesn't mean he shared it.
Sanders had a separate agenda. His repeated use of the same term as #Putin used in disinformation is no more implicating than his using Obama's font & message in his signs.
Putin's influencing of Sanders supporters was meant to steer voters away from HRC & toward Trump & Jill Stein.
3rd party votes in PA, WI & MI were 800k. HRC lost by only 77k. So it worked.
What Putin didn't count on was the vast disconnect between the way Americans actually voted--choosing #HillaryClinton by 3M more votes than Trump--and the 77 Electoral College votes that allowed him to go to the White House.
That de-legitimized Trump's "win."
Trump has proven to be a willing participant with #Putin as #Helsinki & the past few days have revealed.
Also, @mirpinero reminded me that even after the primary was over, Sanders tried to do an end run around Hillary's nomination and get Trump to debate him. Trump toyed with Sanders for a day and then walked away saying it wasn't at all appropriate. cnn.com/2016/05/27/pol…
In that desperate plea for a debate, Sanders asked Devine to ask Manafort to arrange it. politico.com/story/2016/06/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I don't think men really understand how different it is to be a woman out in the world and how quickly things can turn dangerous.
When I was living in New Orleans, I was walking home from work one night. It was fall--dark early & foggy.
A man came out of the fog toward me.
1/
He said hi, I said hi.
As he started to pass me, he asked me if I had the time.
I looked at my watch, looked up, he had a gun pointed at me.
He hit me so fast I wasn't able to steel myself.
I fell to the ground.
He said, "I could rape you right now, but I don't have time."
2/
He wanted my money.
I had the grocery money for the entire house (I lived with 3 other people) in my purse.
He took it and disappeared into the fog.
The whole thing was maybe ten minutes, start to finish.
I was shaking so hard I could hardly get up.
My head was bleeding.
3/
The majority of the working class in America is women and POC.
And white men as a group haven't voted majority Democrat since 1964--they stopped after LBJ signed the the #VRA.
Flip the narrative and start listening to the ACTUAL working class--the rest of us.
Stop centering white men for everything.
Stop claiming only white men can save us from the damage white men did to us.
Women are the working class--my investigation here:
.@matthewstoller is very worried about white men, but it's really women of all races who are facing the worst effects of economic and social stresses.
My investigation here: damemagazine.com/2018/05/10/why…
The relentlessness of passing over superb women with strong credentials & election histories in favor of whatever man is a headline at a moment is exhausting.
Two months ago it was Avenatti. Now it's O'Rourke.
Bypassing the majority of Americans--women--is a national disgrace.
O'Rourke is fine. He is not, Harris, Gillibrand or Klobuchar.
▪Gillibrand is Congress' leader on women's rights & sexual assault victims.
▪Harris set NN2018 on fire with her speeches reclaiming identity politics.
▪ Klobuchar highlighted #Kavanaugh's unfitness for SCOTUS.
Americans MUST stop looking past women to find some man, any man to supplant them.
It took THIRTY YEARS of incredibly hard work for @HillaryClinton to get to run for POTUS. The rules for women are so different. No one sees a woman give a single speech and says "president!"
I lived in NOLA right after college.
I drank most every day, as did everyone I knew.
We were all in the domestic Peace Corps, all in our early 20s, all hardworking activists with stressful work.
We drank too much at Mardi Gras, New Year's.
It's absurd to claim #Kavanaugh didn't.
Those of us who've had alcoholics in our lives--like Klobuchar--tend to be careful about alcohol because we've been damaged by the drunks in our lives. I'm a control freak, so never liked being drunk, but lots of my friends did. What IS true, is most 20somethings drink to excess.
This new tack from the #GOP to dismiss #Kavanaugh's alcoholic drinking--& I am not saying he was/is an alcoholic, but he certainly drank like one--is just wrong. It undermines their own credibility and ignores reality: statistically the vast majority of teens/20s get drunk OFTEN.
Let's talk about sex, #Kavanaugh & Venn diagram overlap of male entitlement.
I've written a lot about sex in various contexts. In the late 80s/early 90s I also gave safe sex workshops back when folks my age were dying 24/7 from #AIDS. My 1st book was on juvenile prostitution.
1/
Most of us know consensual and non-consensual sex differ. The entirety of #Kavanaugh's defense and his defenders' outrage is predicated on the presumption that no teenaged boy knows what consent is.
THEY. KNOW.
Some, like their adult counterparts, don't care.
This is key.
2/
Since #MeToo we've seen egregious serial rapists like #BillCosby and #HarveyWeinstein exposed & attempts made to prosecute them.
But there are "lesser" sexual assaults we've given a lighter hand to: Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, Mark Halperin, Louis CK--too many to list.
3/