When all the sorting is finished, the party realignments will reveal blank slate vs. evolutionary biology as the fundamental schism between the two new parties.
We see this happening at all levels of policy making and institutional behavior.
Starting with the assumption that all careers should be 50/50 split men/women is a prime example.
Policies which result from this assumption are coercive.
Accepting that men and women are fundamentally different is a death blow to the latest wave of feminist thinking.
They must reject biological essentialism and embrace blank slate-ism in order to continue their outraged warfare.
Again - this isn't a "colleague" this isn't her "boss" this isn't anyone she even works with. This guy is a dude she is seducing for information, plying him with alcohol, pretending to be his friend, when all she wants is information from him.
And the she complains when it works
What bothers me about this is that this women is manipulating the guy, then complaining about it being effective.
All her followers think she was sexually harassed!
Guys - if you respond to a woman's seduction - you're a harasser!
I didn't know @archillect was a synthetic intelligence. Wow.
This article speculates on how synthetic intelligences may or may not be able to endure fame, especially if their appeal lies in taste making / curation.
As @archillect becomes more famous and engaged by a mass audience rather than niche, her ability to ID interesting trends in visual tastes decreases.
This is a fascinating parallel to how mass culture subsumes subcultures and denudes them through appropriation.
Mass culture values subcultures and niches.
Yet adoption of underground ideas/arts/music/trends invariably leads to stripping the subculture of the value which first made it appealing to early adopters - and thus the masses.
It was an honor and a privilege to meet @JonHaidt last night. I cite his work heavily in #DemocratToDeplorable. I gave him a copy of the book as he signed my copy of Righteous Mind.
Told him I was speaking at Evergreen. His advice: read How to Win Friends and Influence People.
I asked him a tough question: "now that the implicit bias test has been debunked, what does that mean for Righteous Mind's main thesis?"
He said that did in fact have to go back and make some changes to both Righteous Mind and Happiness Hypothesis now that the IAT is bunk.
But Haidt seemed confident in his original idea which is that we're ruled by emotions rather than reason.
I tend to agree with him.
Still, the IAT is garbage which should be lit on fire and tossed in a dumpster.