Hi for everyone who knows me as a scientist—I have scaled back pretty intensely on my countertrolling.
Occasionally I will do it though. Part of this is pedagogy, believe it or not.
This is a thread about countertrolling as educational justice praxis.
I have a few jobs. One is to do & communicate really good science: I do that with most of my time. Probably about 50% of my waking hours total are spent on science thought/communicating it.
This is my duty to my supervisors, my colleagues, and especially my funders (taxpayers)
But a thing a lot of my white colleagues may not know is that as a visible/known Native presence in the academy, it is my duty to make more room up here for other marginalized folks to join if they want to.
I do this in a lot of ways. One is by bringing our issues to the academy (a couple years ago, @ConnectedWaters, @AnneWHilborn, @am_anatiala, and I wrote an opinion piece for a scientific journal on the #NoDAPL water protectors and why scientists should care)
Another way is by showing people (especially Native folks) that it’s okay to be an outspoken advocate for our communities, while being a scientist.
It’s important that I use the social clout that comes with a high level of formal education, to lift up, defend, and encourage.
So when a random nameless troll targets an Indigenous woman and tells her that her masters degree means nothing and that she is illiterate?
That’s a time when it is important for me to show up for my community.
We are so used to being told that we don’t matter and never could matter.
Broken treaties, stolen children, culture outlawed, treated as literal mascots and costumes—we get this message bombarded at us CONSTANTLY.
It especially harms our youth.
CW suicide
Our youth have the highest suicide rate of any demographic, and in spite of psychology literature showing that things like mascots have an impact, change is slow or nonexistent.
So I know what it seems like to you, like I just can’t keep my feelings or mouth in check
And I have become careful about when I deploy it because I am aware that it is dissonant for my white colleagues that I will scrap and swear and snarl.
But I hope you can understand, I am doing this intentionally.
I am doing it based on evidence that shows it HELPS.
I am doing this because a lot of you, my nonNative colleagues, learn about the prevalence and strength of anti-indigenous racism, when I do it.
I am doing it because you should know—how can you act against it if you are ignorant?
And I am doing it because there are precious few Native people with PhDs and other advanced degrees.
Because we do matter. Because this social clout is one of the few things I have that can make any difference.
Please understand that as much as it is our duty to do good science and communicate it well?
It is my duty to advocate for my community, and to maintain my connection, in various ways, while I live in diaspora.
Sometimes that looks like brawling on social media.
It’s not the same as brawling.
The humanity of my community is at the heart of it.
If you think that’s not professional, please also consider that it is a calculated risk I am taking.
I think you can respect that, even if you don’t understand the duty.
Thank you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I wish conservation biologists would build their field using indigenous (to whatever area) knowledge.
It’s exhausting, as a Native scientist, to watch colonialist framings constantly set up unjust precedents and then subtly (or not) blame nonscientists for issues.
That’s a lot I’m asking for because in order to do it nonextractively, (mostly white) folks who want to do their science in (mostly) not-their-backyard would have to really come to grips with the imperialist idea that parachuting in to study A Species isn’t privileged af.
It would require building authentic, culturally relevant, mutually respectful LONG TERM relationships with indigenous people who live near That Species.
It would require being told “no” and respecting it.
It would require dismantling baked-in white supremacy in STEM.
Here's the thing. I am overjoyed, thrilled, and grateful to see what I am interpreting as the gates (the ones kept by science gatekeepers) being ajar and potentially open to indigenous knowledge.
Simultaneously, I am furious that what it takes for me to discover this, is dressing up indigenous knowledge in language that is deemed 'sufficiently smart' by the academy.
Gwen Benaway did a great thread recently about how poetry written by indgenous people is often coded as 'plain' and 'simple' and 'raw', and how those words are used to other and dismiss the messages and humanity of the writers.
Encoding “violent totalitarianism using theology as an excuse” as trademarkedly a property of Islam is a pretty great example of the pervasive antipathy towards other belief systems, that I was talking about in my initial tweet.
The reply was especially disquieting because, well
Because first off the person was situating themself as an outgroup—as in “not one of those violent religious bigots”...
...while using an Islamic extremist group as the holotype example.
That’s so obviously bigoted along religious lines that I almost don’t know what to say
An attorney in Tennessee and has been cc-ing me on emails thinking I was his wife (we have similar names), for the last 18 months.
They have progressed to calling me.
I’ve tried calling them to explain. I’ve tried emailing. This guy does not give up.
I am unhappy about this.
I may have typos in my tweets but I know my partner’s email.
Today I called his business associates to ask if they could remove me from THEIR lists.
They were like “oh...well....his wife’s name is Katherine Crocker”
That’s fair.
But also?
This guy has a law degree though am I wrong in being concerned that he doesn’t realize YOU CANNOT JUST PUT SOMEONES INITIALS OR NAME OR WHATEVER IN FRONT OF @-EMAILSERVER.COM AND HAVE IT AUTOMATICALLY GO TO THE PERSON YOU ARE THINKING ABOUT.
Excuse me, are you honestly trying to equate informal language use with literacy, while implying that natural linguistic evolution constitutes lexicide?
FIRST OF ALL you got a helluva nerve sashaying in here to try to shame people for expressing their complex lived experiences with code switching.
NEXT let’s deconstruct shall we the absolute bullshit construct of [your version of] “literacy” as a valid proxy for humanity.
Simply put? Whether someone is literate has fck all to do with their ability to experience life, express those experiences, or have thoughts about them.
YOU WANNA EQUATE FORMAL EDUCATION WITH HUMANITY WELL COLONIZER YOU CAN GO DIE IN A HOLE RIGHT NOW