Some folks will tell you it's too late to pass Sen. Wyden's #PAVEAct before the midterms and that the hand marked paper ballots clause will never be accelerated to 2018 anyway, so we should not waste our time demanding it. I disagree. 1/
We need out LEADERS in Washington to clarify for the entire country what MUST and CAN be done by 2018 to protect our votes. Even if the #PAVEAct does not pass, clarity of messaging may facilitate change at the state & local level. 2/
With so much misinformation from the Election Assistance Commission itself and many state and county local officials, we desperately need someone to LEAD the country in this area. @RonWyden "gets it." His #PAVEAct is spot on (except for delaying implementation to 2020). 3/
There has NEVER BEEN MASS VOTER ENGAGEMENT ABOUT ELECTION SECURITY. So we don't know what we can and cannot achieve if we mobilize like we have mobilized on other issues. And there IS still time for hand marked ballots in 2018. 4/
6/ So please amplify Sen. Wyden's messaging in this area and his #PAVEAct, while demanding that the hand marked paper ballots clause accelerate to 2018!
10/ If you'd rather demand #handmarkedpaperballots and the #PAVEAct from your senators via Twitter, feel free to cut and paste the script into a Twitter Thread of your own. Here are twitter addresses for all US senators: socialseer.com/resources/us-s…
11/ It matters that our leaders FIGHT for the right thing. And it matters that we DEMAND that they do that. Because we might actually succeed! Even if we don't, it's a lot harder 2 challenge suspicious election outcomes based on what should have been done if u never asked for it.
12/ And it's a lot harder to explain why suspicious election outcomes should be challenged if you have an uninformed populace. Which is again, why we need our leaders in Washington to inform them!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Study shows that people of all political persuasions are willing to modify their beliefs based on corrective info from reliable sources, but “subjects ‘re-believed’ the false info when retested a week later.” 1/ news.northeastern.edu/2018/06/18/tir…
2/ The author of the article says It may help to warn people in advance that they are likely to forget the correction bc “this helps them mentally tag the bogus information as false.”
3/ It’s also “important that the corrective information be repeated as frequently, and with even greater clarity, than the myth.”
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but elections have been electronically suspect starting long before the Trump/Russia scandal. This article is lulling folks into a false sense of security, which is dangerous. Domestic hackers & insiders were always an equal threat. 1/
I agree, tho not enuf time (and 0 political will) to do this in Nov. Wish it were different. For now I hope to stop states from doubling up on electronics w/ touchscreen ballot markers. Using electronics to count votes is bad enuf. Having them mark our ballots too is nuts. 1/
Nuts except for those who are unable to hand mark their ballots. Once you have hand marked paper ballots they can be either scanned or hand counted (my preference) or both. 2/
Any time u put a machine between the voter and the paper record of voter intent there is an opportunity for programming mischief. Here is just the latest example.: 3/
I’m hoping some of the cyber experts who signed the letter about the risks of using cellular modems to transfer election results can answer this question. Thx! @philipbstark@SEGreenhalgh@rad_atl@jhalderm
Seeing as no one has answered yet, I will say that even if the cellular modems CAN be configured to bypass the internet, we should not have to blindly trust that vendors or whoever else is hired to set them up will do that.
Kathy Rogers, the face & voice of @ESSVote, which has installed CELLULAR MODEMS in tabulators in WI & FL, is cozying up to @DHSgov which refuses to advise states to remove the modems despite a letter from 30 cyber experts & EI groups stating it should do so. #CorruptElections 1/
The notion that cellular modems affect only “unofficial” results is bogus bc, among other reasons, in certain jurisdictions, unofficial results become the official results once added to absentees & provisionals—sometimes w/o ever comparing them to the precinct results tapes! 1/
And Wisconsin doesn’t even require that counties publicly post the results tapes so that the public itself can make this comparison! (I don’t know about Florida, Michigan, & Illinois.) 2/
Thus, we must simply trust that someone trustworthy is conducting this due diligence. In Johnson County, Kansas, the County acknowledged that it does NOT conduct this basic due diligence. 3/