A war on everything which made America what it is.
I’m a casualty of this war but also the spear.
In my book I ask the question :
Will those who claim oppressed status today willingly admit they are no longer held down once they attain power?
Or will they maintain the posture of grievance?
Under cover of faux oppression will they seek retribution?
What will pay back be?
If you’re aware + honest w/ yourself about the trends - if you’re thinking ten years out - you must ask what the “oppressed class” will do once they pull all the levers of Power.
This sounds like heavy leather boot stomps approaching to many of us - not the lightness of freedom
I ask and answer many of these questions in my book - the book is far more than just stories - it’s an in-depth analysis of all these issues and a provocative journey into the future.
The perverted SJW places us in an unsolvable conundrum.
We don’t want to think of the world in racial terms - but you force us.
We don’t want to see the world in gender terms - but you compell us.
We don’t want to live in a world of conflict - but you attack us.
It’s important to note. All positions of power don’t need to be filled by feminists + POC for them to have achieved power
The ideology of intersectionality has already infiltrated corporations + institutions at the highest level thereby granting the feminists and POC proxy power
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Again - this isn't a "colleague" this isn't her "boss" this isn't anyone she even works with. This guy is a dude she is seducing for information, plying him with alcohol, pretending to be his friend, when all she wants is information from him.
And the she complains when it works
What bothers me about this is that this women is manipulating the guy, then complaining about it being effective.
All her followers think she was sexually harassed!
Guys - if you respond to a woman's seduction - you're a harasser!
I didn't know @archillect was a synthetic intelligence. Wow.
This article speculates on how synthetic intelligences may or may not be able to endure fame, especially if their appeal lies in taste making / curation.
As @archillect becomes more famous and engaged by a mass audience rather than niche, her ability to ID interesting trends in visual tastes decreases.
This is a fascinating parallel to how mass culture subsumes subcultures and denudes them through appropriation.
Mass culture values subcultures and niches.
Yet adoption of underground ideas/arts/music/trends invariably leads to stripping the subculture of the value which first made it appealing to early adopters - and thus the masses.
It was an honor and a privilege to meet @JonHaidt last night. I cite his work heavily in #DemocratToDeplorable. I gave him a copy of the book as he signed my copy of Righteous Mind.
Told him I was speaking at Evergreen. His advice: read How to Win Friends and Influence People.
I asked him a tough question: "now that the implicit bias test has been debunked, what does that mean for Righteous Mind's main thesis?"
He said that did in fact have to go back and make some changes to both Righteous Mind and Happiness Hypothesis now that the IAT is bunk.
But Haidt seemed confident in his original idea which is that we're ruled by emotions rather than reason.
I tend to agree with him.
Still, the IAT is garbage which should be lit on fire and tossed in a dumpster.