Carter Page has stoutly denied on many occasions that he held “secret talks” in Moscow on his infamous trip there on 7-8 July 2016. But a high ranking Russian official and economist, Mikhail Delyagin, said that he did. #steele#carterpage#russiagate
1/ Here’s the link to the Russian web page, which is dated 11 July 2016, a few days after Page’s trip to Moscow. It is headlined: “Counselor Trump [Carter Page] and Gazprom held secret talks in Moscow - and sat on the podium.” tinyurl.com/ya56z4kc
2/ This is further evidence of the credibility and importance of the Steele dossier, which alleged that Page did have secret talks in Moscow. Steele’s sources, however, told him that the talks were with Sechin, the head of Rosneft, the Russian Federation’s giant oil company.
3/ Delyagin says the secret talks were with Gazprom--which makes more sense, since Page had contacts with Gazprom from his time in Moscow when he worked for Merrill Lynch.
4/ The head of Gazprom is Alexey Miller, who is also close to Putin (though not quite as close as Sechin). Gazprom is even more important to Putin for geopolitical reasons than Rosneft.
5/ The amazing Christopher Steele might, of course, turn out to be right about Page having had “secret talks” with Sechin as well.
6/ But in any case, it is significant that Delyakin alleges (in a post that has been deleted and had to be retrieved from archives) that Page did hold “secret talks” in Moscow--which Page has denied.
7/ Stedman says he will be posting more of his findings about Page in the new future. Stay tuned.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I posted this to Twitter a long time ago. It’s from Yuri Felshtinsky and Vladimir Pribylovsky, The Corporation: Russia and the KGB in the Age of President Putin. Encounter Books. 2008, pp. 40-41 (not available online):
(THREAD) Collins votes YES, so Kavanaugh’s confirmed.
This is the finale of the confirmation VOTE, but it is NOT the end of the #Kavanaugh ISSUE. 1/14
The FBI “investigation” was a sham, and that makes Collins’ special pleading for her YES vote a sham. It was a sickening performance. 2/14
The fatal weakness of her defense of her vote is that there was no meaningful investigation. Merely seeking corroboration in the form of direct, eyewitness testimony from the participants of the 1 Jul 1982 meeting does not constitute a meaningful investigation. 3/14
A subjective impression, admittedly, but in the pics and videos I have seen, Senate Rs look grim and worried--even, on occasion, angry.
D claim that this was a cover-up (20+ witnesses not called) is getting traction. No adequate push back from Rs yet.
McConnell saying on the floor that the Senate must vote to confirm b/c “in this country you’re not guilty until proven innocent” has this whole matter so wrong (it’s a job interview, Mitch, not a trial) that he must be feeling a little desperate.
(THREAD) The predicted early conclusion of the FBI background check on #Kavanaugh that has been reported by Politico and the WSJ is surprising and cause for anxiety and concern, but let’s look try hard to look on the (possibly) bright side. 1/8
We must keep in mind that this investigation is essentially a background check on #Kavanaugh, in light of newly surfaced allegations of belligerent drunkenness and sexual violence alleged against him by Ford and others. 2/8
So this investigation is more about Kavanaugh and his nomination than it is about Ford or any other accusers, and while the FBI does not reach conclusions, it does uncovers facts, and presents those facts to others so they can better reach their own conclusions. 3/8