#ManafortTrial Thread - More from Dennis Raico direct examination -
In another email from Raico’s assistant to Tom Horn, an underwriter who sits on the credit committee at Federal Savings Bank, the assistant wrote that she “spoke to Paul” and got info for Manafort loan app.
(1/8)
According to Raico, there were “discrepancies” in Manafort’s income and tax returns.
“What do you mean by discrepancies?” Andres asked.
“A plus B didn’t equal C all the time,” Raico said.
(2/8)
A $300,000 outstanding balance on Manafort’s American Express card for season tickets to the New York Yankees was one of the “discrepancies,” Raico said. Raico said in February 2016, it was Manafort who told him he had lent the card to Richard Gates.
(3/8)
Gates disputed this during testimony earlier this week.
Manafort told Raico he anticipated repayment on the American Express balance by the end of May of that year but by September, the balance was still outstanding.
(4/8)
Raico testified that Calk and Manafort had met on several occasions by that point, often for lunch.
By October 5, 2016, Raico told prosecutors he and Federal Savings Bank president Javier Ubarri met with Calk to submit Manafort’s loan application but it hit a snag.
(5/8)
In an email from Calk to Manafort, where Raico was blind copied, Calk wrote in the subject line: “Major issue.”
The “major issue,” Calk said was that instead of a $2.5 million outstanding mortgage for the Bridgehampton property, it was actually $3.5 million.
(6/8)
Manafort hadn’t told Federal Savings Bank about the discrepancy before. When Calk inquired, Manafort chalked it up to forgetting, calling it a “blackout.”
(7/8)
Raico told prosecutors Calk emailed him after the exchange, looking for a way to make the income fit the application.
“I look to your cleverness to understand the underwriting,” Calk wrote.
(8/8)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD - Some observations I recorded while at the protest this afternoon:
- There were several federal employees (recognized by their badges) who had some very, very nasty things to say about people exercising their 1A.
- Protestors were very calm, very respectful but emotional
- The crowd was incredibly diverse. Every color, creed, orientation, age, from infants to the elderly, + the heat stopped no one
- Every time a rape survivor or assault survivor would get on a mic or bullhorn, and share their story, the crowd replied: "I believe you."
- Each person I talked to, of which there were several, expressed their concern over the gravity of Kavanaugh's appointment and how it would impact future generations
- Above anger or outrage, there was a palpable sadness in ppl's voice when they considered my questions
THREAD - It is time to head to @Scotus. On deck: Madison v. Alabama. Is it a violation of the Constitution to execute a man who can't remember his crime? Well into his 60s & w/dementia, Vernon Madison argues executing someone who doesn't understand why he is being punished...1/4
implicitly fails to serve the purposes of the death penalty. The execution would not deter future crimes nor would it punish him for his conduct. The state, Alabama, doubts his claims of incapacity, suggesting he knows when to decline certain meds etc. Also even if he doesn't...
recall killing the officer, a court appointed psychologist says he has a "rational" understanding as to why he'll be executed, state argues. Alabama hinges their position on 8A, which they say, does not prevent them from executing him because he claims he can't remember. 3/4
THREAD I suppose I need to state my belief on this for the record because it will save me time. Folks, I want to believe Kavanaugh wont be confirmed because even if you dont #BelieveHer, the man is not fit for the bench. #sorrynotsorry (Evidenced by his own behavior yesterday)
But I have zero trust that the people in Congress who need to do the right thing, will.
I often see people shocked! at the injustice of it all. For me, I am just totally too close to the situation to be shocked. About any of it.
I operate from doubt most of the time tho I am...
optimistic. Because I believe in the power of good people and progress. But I also have a good idea of how power works & I have watched congresspeople throw away their own voters interests time and time and time again. It isnt specific to one party, either.
THREAD - In October, I'll cover several arguments at @Scotus:
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Fish and Wildlife Service, which challenges the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service designation of 1,544 acres of land in Louisiana as critical habit for the dusky gopher frog. 1/4 @CourthouseNews
Weyerhauser operates a logging business on the land and maintains the frog cannot live there without "radical change in land use."
2/4
Then, I'll cover Madison v. Alabama, which is about a death penalty challenge brought by a man who has dementia and says he can no longer remember committing the crime.
3/4
THREAD - Some reactions from Democratic Senators at a press conference this a.m. during the lunch break:
Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del. “It is striking how many survivors of sexual assault are watching and choosing this moment to come forward with their accounts." 1/4 @CourthouseNews
Coons cont.: "It speaks to what a public service is being done here by having a measured and respectful hearing of Dr. Ford’s allegations.”
2/4
Sen Patrick Leahy's, D-Vt., take on questioning from the Republican prosecutor:
“She’s very professional and you have to ask the question, why don’t they ask their own questions?”
Then told reporters: "Maybe someone should ask why they’re hiding their other witnesses."
3/4
AGs from the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Pennsylvania plus states of California, Maryland, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia signed off.
2/5