I’m feeling weirdly hurt by the viral tweet mocking geoscientists for licking rocks.
I get that we’re a bit weird even for scientists and get a bit more blunt with our toolset, but licking rocks is a real strategy. Taste & texture are diagnostic.
Evaporites are soft (scratch with your fingernail), but the easiest way to ID between halite vs sylvite is salty vs sour.
IDing sand vs clay is the cutoff between gritty or not.
Fossils stick to your tongue.
You don’t NEED to lick rocks; it’s just faster & easier.
I don’t lick every wild rock I meet, and licking lab samples is just gross.
But if you’re out doing field rock ID, you already know enough to keep your tongue away from arsenopyrite & don’t waste your time nibbling granite.
Not all geoscientists lick rocks. I’m geophysics — 95% of my rock ID is recreational, & it’s been at least a year since I last licked a rock.
But it’s not an inherently ridiculous concept worthy of mockery.
Epilogue:
Q: But what about that salt-licking scene in Last Jedi? Surely that was ridiculous!
A: No. That was plausible bordering on geo fan service.
And it’s tactically important to know what rocks encompass you unless you’re a fan of dumb ways to die.
Q: What about the Doctor?!
A: Excellent tasting technique.
I don’t remember which episode this is for context, but I’d guess dry former water body with sour-bitter-tangy sylvite (or salty halite, but that’s usually less pucker).
Q: Please critique Jack Sparrow's geology taste test technique?
A: Terrible.
First: WAY too much tongue. It's test, not a snack.
Second: Any rock tough enough to weather into that nice smooth shape isn't one where taste is diagnostic. All you'll get is the seawater coating.
Doctor Who: Sediments were dead people, so taste test is EXTREMELY diagnostic. Fossils stick to your tongue; desiccating/sticky texture.
Other pop culture geo taste tests? Ping with gif/clip/still for critique.
Q: ...but won't it kill you if you lick the wrong rock?
A: Do not lick anything with mercury, arsenic, or lead. A few others can still kill you (lookin' at you, villiaumite, torbernite, & chalcanthite), but that's a good starting point.
Bad minerals to lick:
Anything that smells like garlic (arsenic). Even handling is sketch thanks to carcinogenic, neurotoxic powder; burning is bonus bad news.
Arsenopyrite: arsenic + sulfur
Orpiment: arsenic + sulfur
Hutchinsonite: sulfosalt of thallium, lead & arsenic
Anything with mercury is a slow, painful way to die.
Cinnabar: gorgeous mercury sulphide; also the most deadly mineral on Earth. Do not lick. Do not even touch. Considering it oxidizes to methyl mercury & dimethyl mercury, don't go near it, either. Just turn around. Now.
Coloradoite: mercury telluride, which are both toxic. Heat it up for a deadly vapour!
Mercury: ...it's mercury. Melts in your hand, then infiltrates and poisons you. So fun, DO NOT LICK.
Really, anything with mercury is just a bad move to lick. Full lick-ban on all Hg minerals.
Chalcanthite: water-soluble copper sulfate. Taste is diagnostic (sweet metallic) yet it leads to copper poisoning. So, don't lick, but if you're going to, make it a quick tongue-touch-retreat to minimize exposure.
Anything with lead is a no-go for licking unless you love the long-term violence of lead poisoning.
Galena: lead. Like, all the lead. So much lead. Don't eat it or huff it. Just smash it with a hammer -- if you get a bunch of smaller cubes, yay, it's galena! Done.
Asbestos (serpentine, crocidolite, grunerite, tremolite, anthophyllite & actinolite) is not inherently deadly to lick, except it'll splinter into your tongue like fibreglass & you'll huff shards into your lungs for long-term damage.
Overall, bad candidate to lick (or pet).
Torbernite: uranium. It's radioactive. Licking anything radioactive is a bad idea. It also has copper for a bonus copper poisoning.
Pitchblende (uraninite) & autunite are also bad choices to lick, but great choices for uranium ores if you need to build a bomb from scratch.
Villiaumite looks seriously tempting, but is a VERY BAD IDEA. It's cherry red, very soft (scratch with your fingernail) & fluoresces under UV light, so licking is unnecessary for ID anyway.
Licking screws up breathing, heartbeat, circulation, nervous system, & skin. Just no.
Q: What about Yukon Cornelius?
A: Licking is a terrible way to ID silver or gold, but from the deleted scenes he was actually looking for peppermint (), which while not a mineral, is something where taste is highly diagnostic.
Q: You do you, but I’d never lick a rock. Ew!
A: Too late, you’ve already licked several minerals today.
Both salt & ice are naturally-occurring crystals with a definite chemical composition. #sorrynotsorry
Q: Is this stalactite appropriate for personal use?
A: Malachite (green) & azurite (blue) are soft copper-rich mineral that are highly sociable in dilute acids.
No. So much no. It’ll break, but before that the copper poisoning will be a nightmare.
ANY stalactite or stalagmite is going to be composed of an acid-sensitive water-solvable mineral that is porous & not particularly strong. It’s inherent in how they form.
Go ahead & lick if you really want (but it’s not diagnostic), but don’t get too up close & personal.
Errata:
Meat cave .gif instead of this one.
*soluble, not sociable, in dilute acid.
That palmful of silver goo on Don’t Lick Mercury Minerals was gallium, which won’t kill you but still doesn’t need licking to ID.
Q: What about Benton Fraser licking sediment from under a suspect’s fingernail clippings?
A: Unhygienic but effective with beautiful tip technique.
Niter (saltpeter) has diagnostic salty baking soda taste. (It’s in gunpowder, but also common in cured meat & sensitive toothpaste)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A woman won the Nobel Prize in Physics?!?!?!? AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
Right. Time to learn about Donna Strickland, the 3rd woman to EVER be awarded the prize. cbc.ca/news/technolog…
I still think the Nobel Prizes (particularly for physics) are sexist garbage with this whole “50 years between each woman” trend they’ve got going on, but I’ll take learning a new name, dammit.
& she’s not even a variant of Maria!!!
I’m not covering the Nobel Prizes, but if any of my women scicomm peeps are doing explainers on chirped pulse amplification of lasers, please ping so I can boost your work. 💥
Camp 1: “THANK YOU! Me/my people can’t evac because xyz. Of course I don’t want to die or endanger rescuers; I did the best I can!”
Their stories are making me so fiercely proud of how determined they are to survive in the face of overwhelming odds against them.
Camp 2: “I live in a country where society has higher standards for providing basic healthcare. What do you mean America doesn’t ensure everyone can evacuate?! Surely not!”
For very specific technical reasons:
- It takes until well after a disaster to establish the official death count as we prioritize saving lives.
- Official death counts are conservative: actual recovered bodies with cause of death linked to the disaster.
Recovering bodies is not always feasible, especially as disasters have a nasty habit of killing response personal.
In BC, the Hope landslide is a grave for 4 people whose bodies were never recovered from under the 47 million cubic meters of rock.
Estimated death counts are extremely tricky. You need to think extremely critically about every assumption made.
Often an actual number is less important than a qualitative description: Every family was devastated. Infrastructure was destroyed for months. Daily life ended.
Even if you think it’s excessive, or over-cautious, or you’ve survived worse. I promise emergency managers don’t issue orders for their own entertainment.
Evac orders are a damn hard call between logistics, vulnerability of destabilization, & loss of trust if it’s conservative.
@markmccaughrean 1. The text of the resolution changed since Monday. Neither the conference website nor the eNewspaper has the updated text.
@markmccaughrean 2. The two head dudes presented their argument to rename, allowed a few comments with no rhyme or reason, ate time refuting criticism, & only named speakers who supported them, before cutting off comment without warning to give a closing statement of support.
@markmccaughrean 3. The Nay vote was presented as “rejection to approve,” because that’s not at all confusing.