Damian is chair of House of Commons Select Committee for culture Media and also sport, which conducted investigation into ‘fake news’ which followed evidential trail that broadened the remit... #BylineFest
That investigation ended up looking into Brexit and the Cambridge Analytica law breaking, and produced a comprehensive and extensive report.
Damian starts by speaking a little about his work with the enquiry...
He says that what he started looking at was content hosted by tech companies that was intended to mislead. It wasn’t just fun or silly stuff like jokes about Trump, it was completely false stuff like the bodies of white women being found with ‘black lives matter’ carved in flesh
Through these platforms you can reachvey large widespread audiences very quickly, and if that is used with bad intent it can have very concerning results.
We weren’t just looking at the responsibilities of tech companies to handle this issue, we looked at who originated content
And this found widespread evidence of the Russians mounting systematic campaigns designed to disrupt democratic elections, including evidence here of efforts to influence the Brexit vote...
There’s been more work on this in the states, buying masssive targeted advertising campaigns. But this is the top of the iceberg. The bigger problem is massive networks of fake accounts designed to appear like real people but work in an orchestrated way...
and this, Damian says, is the responsibility of the tech companies to address. He doesn’t want them to have an opinion on content, but wants real transparency of who people really are and where messages are coming from. People need to know how their data is used too.
Damian calls for a levy on tech companies to fund regulation on this. The equivalent of the banks payinva levy to fund the financial conduct authority. The tech companies levy should go to fund the ICO. “We need robust regulators that can check what the tech companies are doing”
“I think people were genuinely shocked that their personal data can be taken from the likes of Facebook and end up j the hands of someone like Alexander Nix” - Damian Collins
Next up is @carolecadwalla the investigative reporter who broke Cambridge Analytica story. She says Damian’s report is an incredible document that rounds up so much different work on this matters, and it makes clear calls for action - eg asking NCA to investigate Brexit funding
She asks Damian if there have been any updates on responses to the things his report calls for. He says parliamentary procedure is that the government has time to respond, and with parliament being in recess now, that won’t be for a while
Damian says there’s a second report coming out in late October, including a deep analysis of the data they got in relation to AIQ and some American data. They also want to see the ICO report. There’ll probably be another evidential session too
Carole says there’s so much evidence building up in relation to Brexit, from his enquiry, from the Electoral commission. She’s says it is a car crash of illegality - there needs to be an overarching enquiry. Asks Damian if there should be a public inquiry. He says yes...
He says we need a Mueller style investigation. And we need to bring together all the investigations and address issues in our democracy.
But Carole says the urgency is now because in a few months we exit the EU as a result of electoral fraud. We need to act now.
He says his committee has limited powers - can’t demand bank records for example. This is why he says a Mueller style investigation is needed.
Damian says the Electoral Commission findings have been passed to the police.
Carole says there won’t be a trial before we leave the EU
Damian says the ICO is a prosecuting body so if they find crimes in relation to their work they can prosecute. But we need the National Crime Agency or the Serious Fraud Office to mount an overarching investigation.
Carole says to Damian “you are the MP who knows most about this and you’re calling for a Mueller style investigation. What does it take to start it?”
Damian says he doesn’t have power to do that. Public inquiries are started by the government, often in response to public pressure
The host of this session, @peterjukes draws a parallel to the phone hacking enquiry that followed the investigation by @Bynickdavies - but the inquiry had a cross party push behind it. Is that needed now, and it feels like many MPs don’t really want the truth to out
Damian says there is a process and the government wouldn’t be entirely wrong to follow it, responding to his response in the autumn and following it from there
Peter asks about the experience of being targeted by the Russians in response to their work. In particular the Russian embassy twitter account trolls them online.
Carole was attacked in a tweet by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs declaring her work fake news.
Damian says at every step of the investigation, evidence of Russian intervention has only got worse. “We’ve been asleep at the wheel. Our intelligence agencies have focused on attacks, but missed this more subtle psychological warfare... interfering in the politics of a country”
He says there needs to be international rules on information warfare like this. There is no complaint they CB bring against Russia to an international body.
A question from the audience: given the illegality that has been exposed, and the time it takes to investigate them, but the hard timeline of Brexit, should we pause or stop it while we investigate?
Damian doesn’t quite answer ;)
Audience question: a large part of the Brexit vote was from old people who get their news from newspapers rather than social media.
Damian says in election or referendum like this you don’t have to sway everyone, you just need to sway 5% or so of people
Peter adds to this on how the tabloids appeared to be linked to the same campaign messages and timings.
Eg the very day Vote Leave gave money to BeLeave group, sun registered as a campaign group and ran a front page saying “BeLeave”
And Michael Gove (accompanied by Rupert Murdoch) got the first interview with Trump in New York to run in the Times including supporting Brexit - so there was a similar campaign running in papers as on social media
An audience member in a question refers to evidence he has provided to Damian and Carole recently of huge amounts of funding from particular sources in the US to fund the Brexit canpaign. (I won’t repeat details here)
Says the US involvement has been ignored so far...
Damian says he has seen some of the evidence and is working on a second report to be published in the autumn.
I suspect we’ll find out more from Carole soon too. So it sounds like there is even more to emerge publicly.
This was a fascinating panel discussion, and in the thread below I kept notes of the key points - what should be done now about the illegality behind the Brexit vote? #BylineFest#BylineFestival
Anyone who works at the Home Office, in any role: at some point, just saying you were only doing your job and following orders is going to no longer be an acceptable defence. Stop enabling these wrongs, and stand up for what is right, before it is too late
History shows us there will be a public enquiry into the hostile environment policy, and these kinds of actions. It may be in 10 years or so, but it will happen. Do you really want to be waiting to be summoned to account for what you did or didn’t do? What you saw and heard?
Picture yourself walking into the court past the press (who are by now of course ‘shocked’ by what is emerging about the HO), your evidence televised live and recorded for the history books.
“I honestly didn’t know it meant they’d stop a 6 year old from being with his mother”
Next up at the @BylineFest is @GaryLineker, someone who has chosen to use his position and celebrity to engage positively in public discourse and faced the wrath of the Press. He’s being interviewed by @thelisamaxwell #BylineFest
First up, how does he respond to people who criticise him using his social media platform to share his views and discuss politics. People who tell him to shut up and stick to football.
He says, I’d say they’re probably right, for all the grief it gives me... #BylineFest
... but in reality, why should I have less opportunity to talk about what I think than the people who raise that criticism. I have these views on political and humanitarian issues and it’s part of who I am, and I don’t just want to be boring like sportspeople who plug their book
He says politicians are talking about an outcome of this being taxing tech companies and using the money to fund journalism...
But this raises the question of what journalism is, in terms of who should get the money.
The government tends to define it as ‘The Press’. So they’re talking about taking money from Google and giving it to the Daily Mail. That’s not going to improve journalism.
The discussion is started by @BrianCathcart a journalist turned academic. He says that the media has always liked to create monsters. It helps to sell papers to stoke a fear of ‘other’.
Next @richpeppiatt a former tabloid journalist says that essentially your job as a journo at a tabloid is to deliver the story you are told. He tells of one colleague who said she didn’t want to do Muslim-bashing stories, so the editor gave her more every day for weeks.
Carole talks about the resistance of the big SV companies to any real transparency or accountability. One of her Guardian colleagues ran a story about Facebook data a long while ago, but Facebook wouldn’t respond, when Carole started with story got the same brick wall...
She says it was only when @chrisinsilico came out as a whistleblower with hard evidence for the public to see that Facebook finally addressed the problem. They have no interest in public scrutiny until there’s a threat of bad PR.
He says there’s a Chinese proverb - lies in a newspaper are like rat droppings in a soup. They are both disgusting and obvious.
He says today the awards are a cornucopia of shit soup… #BylineFest
@BadPressAwards@BylineFest@johnmitchinson … John says that standards are lower than ever before, and this year international bodies have cited the UKs news industry as an outlier in terms of how little the public trust it.
The first award: most obvious sponsored content. News that is really advertising, but is disguised as a news story...