Yes - really disappointing piece by the usually-solid @hknightsf . She immediately dismisses $220M of homeless spending - *poof*. It's just not a well-founded analysis.
OK let's run thru the #s quickly. Again, I'm a big fan of @hknightsf who usually gives solid takes based on common sense. Which makes the fast+loose stats in her homeless piece so weird.... @annkillion @EsmeAlaki @peterhartlaub @cjane87 @pims @gazooly12 @LondonbreedAnn @Sharkyl
1/When authors are going to play fast and loose, the funny biz is usually front-loaded. So look carefully @ the start of a piece. Right away @hknightsf deletes $55M of $300M homeless spending by declaring she's only covering SF Homeless Dept spending ($250M) *poof* byebye $55M
2/In the next breath we learn that Homeless Dept is getting $35M bump next year. Makes sense that overall $ gets similar 14% bump so $305M becomes $347M this yr. Relevant b/c the column ends with call to double $305M spending via tax on ballot. It's going up regardless.
3/Then we get the revelation that 2/3 of spending is on *formerly* homeless or people *close* to homeless. Valid + useful point. We don't get # for these but let's say it's 100% of counted street homeless (7500.)
4/That draws down our $305M by $201M - a big #. We're left with $104M. Then more flim-flammery: "take away 11% for administrative costs and 1 time capital expenditures." No we jolly will not wave away another $33M.
5/Then there's a bit about the 7500 homeless not being the *same* homeless. Also, maybe it's an undercount. OK, fine, use the 12000 per night figure from homeless Dept guy, ignoring the silly "not the same people" line.
6/Where we get to at the end of a fairer number-crunching is $104M ÷ 12000 homeless = $8700 per homeless person. It ain't $40K true but it's also not the silly $3800 the article alleges. And remember that figure has already increased to closer to $10K/person this year.
7/Regardless of what side you've chosen in the Govt spending/homeless debate, hopefully this gives you a better understanding of what SF spends, and the big fail in @hknightsf''s piece. Will doubling the spending solve the problem? Color me skeptical. Other reform is needed.<END>
@threadreaderapp unroll, please

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Reinholdt

Richard Reinholdt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(