Pulp Librarian Profile picture
Sep 1, 2018 19 tweets 8 min read Read on X
#Twitter: what is it good for? How do you get good at it? And what will we do when it's gone? Today in pulp I share a few insights I've gleaned from almost five years of running this account.

Its about to get all meta...
Most people's tweets are a stream of consciousness, and Twitter itself is a daily flow of 500 million of these across the surface of your phone. You are currently looking at the collective unconscious of the planet...
And like any examination of the unconscious you will see things on Twitter that fascinate you and things that disgust you. This is part of its attraction: the filters of discourse become permeable, allowing the unsayable to leak across.
Compared to other social media Twitter is relatively open. Regardless of who you follow (or who follows you) you will still see a huge variety of content from millions of other people. It's less filtered or targeted than Facebook and reasonably unstructured.
Twitter is designed to be addictive: it promotes interactions (likes, retweets etc) which trigger rewards: dopamine released into the medial forebrain bundle of the brain making us feel pleasure. As interactions are unpredictable they act as a variable ratio reward schedule.
Variable reward schedules help form the addictive nature of gambling: you never know when you might win. Combining intermittent rewards for producing content along with the fascination of consuming the unfiltered thoughts of strangers makes Twitter a uniquely rewarding activity.
But Twitter can also be unpleasant, aggressive and unreasonable. Politics (personal, cultural or governmental) drives the majority of this hostility. Twitter is the cockpit of political discourse online and magnifies differences of opinion into catastrophic battles of identity.
Many people get around the nastiness that Twitter amplifies by having two Twitter accounts: one to tweet pictures of cats and one to call other people c*nts. Cognitive dissonance is alas a central part of the Twitter experience: irrationality is the norm.
The hierarchy of Twitter users goes as follows (least to most numerous)
- celebrities
- brands
- actual people
- twitterbots
- lurkers
- dormant accounts

The last three categories make up 70-80% of most people's followers.
Given the above, how should you approach Twitter if you want to make a success of it? Below are my insights from over four years of tweeting. They are unscientific, but 60% of the time they work all of the time. Trust me, I'm a doctor*.

(*of Geography. Still counts.)
First insight: you are NOT the audience. In fact you have no idea who your audience is. Most of your followers are not paying attention. Most of your attention comes from random people bumping into your stuff. So forget about trying to 'target' tweets.
For example: the four most popular tweets I've ever done have been about:
- women in swamps
- calculators
- a big pink rabbit
- the Dune colouring book

That is a bizarre Venn diagram. So don't try and predict what will work. If it feels good, do it!
Second insight: curiosity trumps outrage. Scientists* have shown that satisfying your curiosity is more motivational than self-interest or self-validation. Showing people fragments of fascinating things generally gets audience attention.

(*proper boffins, not ones on the telly)
Third insight: the only metric that counts is the number of people who say "thank you." Likes, retweet, opportunities to see - it's all numerical bullsh*t. If people say "cheers, that was good" then you are measurably succeeding. Otherwise assume nothing.
Fourth insight: have a positive purpose. I tweet books, artists, writers and content that you may like but haven't yet seen. I'm no expert and I learn from all of you every day. But you know what to expect from me and whether I'm worth a follow for a while. That keeps me trying.
Fifth insight: sic transit gloria mundi. You don't pay for Twitter, and some day they will switch it off. All your content will be lost and your followers evaporate. Like the samurai you should think of the inevitability of death every day, then go and do something heroic.
Last insight: be ferociously polite. That's the advice Joanna Lumley gives to new actors who want to get ahead and it still counts today. Manners maketh man.
The fact we can reach the world from our phones should make our heads spin. The fact that we use this privilege to share total nonsense should make us rejoice . Twitter is the social media equivalent of punk: you only need three chords and some attitude. Rock on.
I'm now taking a Twitter break for a bit. Back at Michaelmas...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pulp Librarian

Pulp Librarian Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PulpLibrarian

Dec 2, 2018
It is the greatest frog-worshiping zombie biker occult horror film ever made. Possibly the only one. It's certainly like no over movie you've ever seen.

Today in pulp, I look back at the 1971 classic Psychomania...
By the early 1970s British horror films were trying to get 'with it' to attract a younger audience. So it wasn't surprising that in 1971 screenwriter Arnaud d'Usseau tried to create a biker horror movie.
d'Usseau had previously written Horror Express, an Anglo-Spanish sci-fi/horror movie loosely based on John W. Campbell's novella Who Goes There. Christopher Lee, Peter Cushing and Telly Savalas did their best with the material.
Read 18 tweets
Oct 9, 2018
"The gun is good! The Penis is evil!" bellows a huge stone head floating over the Irish countryside. It's quite a strange start to any movie, but it's about to get even stranger...

This is the story of John Boorman's classic 1974 film Zardoz.
In 1970 director John Boorman began work on a Lord Of The Rings film for United Artists. It would be an unusual adaption; The Beatles would be the Hobbits and Kabuki theatre would open the movie . Alas the studio said 'No', but the idea of a fantasy film stuck with Boorman...
So in 1972, following the commercial success of Deliverance, John Boorman started work on Zardoz - a fantasy film into which he would cram many unorthodox ideas. Initially Burt Reynolds was to play the lead role of Zed, but pulled out citing other filming commitments.
Read 13 tweets
Oct 8, 2018
As it's #LibrariesWeek let's look back at Britain's favourite library book*: the 1977 Usborne Guide to the Supernatural World!

(*according to my readers)
Supernatural World was an anthology of three existing Usborne pocketbooks: Vampires, Mysterious Powers and Ghosts. As an Usborne hardback it was deemed perfect for the nation's libraries.
Usborne had previously fascinated and frightened readers with its 1977 World Of The Unknown series: a terrifying triptych of ghosts, monsters and UFOs. Supernatural World would continue in the same vein.
Read 12 tweets
Oct 7, 2018
It was a university course for the price of a packet of cigarettes: Pelican Books! Maybe the blend wasn't to everyone's taste, but there's no denying the addictive nature of the range.

Today in pulp I look back at the autodidact's bible...
In 1937, two years after Allen Lane founded Penguin books, the company decided on a new imprint to provide academic and intellectual non-fiction for the general public. Lane believed there was a market for “intelligent books at a low price” which he was determined to serve
Over its lifetime Pelican sold a quarter of a billion books covering almost 3,000 subjects. Lane apparently came up with the Pelican name when he overheard a woman at King’s Cross railway station mistakenly asking for a Pelican book instead of a Penguin one.
Read 14 tweets
Oct 7, 2018
📩PULP POSTBAG TIME!📩

And today's letter is home computer related...
Mr Derrick Wibley from Penge writes: "Dear PL, I recently invested in a 48k ZX Spectrum to help run my stationery business 'Penge Pens'. However I'm worried it's not powerful enough to meet the needs of my ambitious business expansion programme. What should I do?"
Well Mr Wibley fear not! The ZX Spectrum is a fully-scaleable integrated solution to your business needs - provided you buy the right peripherals!
Read 13 tweets
Oct 6, 2018
The Time Machine, Brave New World, 1984: these weren’t the first dystopian novels. There's an interesting history of Victorian and Edwardian literature looking at the impact of modernity on humans and finding it worrying.

Today in pulp I look at some early dystopian books…
Paris in the Twentieth Century, written in 1863, was the second novel penned by Jules Verne. However his publisher Pierre-Jules Hetzel rejected it as too gloomy. The manuscript was only discovered in 1994 when Verne’s grandson hired a locksmith to break into an old family safe.
The novel, set in 1961, warns of the dangers of a utilitarian culture. Paris has street lights, motor cars and the electric chair but no artists or writers any more. Instead industry and commerce dominate and citizens see themselves as cogs in a great economic machine.
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(