Abby Franquemont 🇺🇸🇵🇪 Profile picture
Sep 3, 2018 15 tweets 4 min read Read on X
It's #LaborDay weekend and all, so I'm gonna do a thread about a job listing I just saw.

I think it's depressing and on the dystopian side that this looks normal to lots of people. Let's unpack it together...

Have a song to read it with:

[1/15]
"We have 2 different opportunities- both in fast growing companies with lots of room for advancement! Hard workers rewarded! I need about 50 people. General Labor to start at $11-$12 an hour. Four shifts available starting 5:30, 6:30, 7:00 and 3:00(pm). Overtime available" [2/15]
This was posted by an individual, not an organizational account. There's a phone number to call, and that's it. There's no company name. There's no location mentioned. There is implication that this is some kind of job agency person with 2 separate requests to hire staff.[3/15]
"Fast growing companies with lots of room for advancement" is supposed to sound appealing I guess? It sounds like "People don't stay here for more than a few weeks to a few months so before you know it you'll be the most senior fucker at this shitshow." [4/15]
"Hard workers rewarded!"

Thus, you know, anybody who does not believe themselves to be richly rewarded is clearly not a hard worker. Also what are the rewards exactly? Just getting paid the wage posted for the job? Being given more work for same pay? What? [5/15]
"I need about 50 people."

Probably supposed to make you go "Oooh they need lots of people so surely my odds are good!"

But I'm still over here like, need them to do what? Where? For a week? For a year? For whom? Did you have 50 people last week but now they're gone? [6/15]
"General Labor to start at $11-$12 an hour."

Internet, define "general labor:"

careertrend.com/facts-6804793-…

study.com/articles/Gener…

indeed.com/q-General-Labo…

So it's a total moving target, but basically, "warm body, can do lifting, can survive shit conditions." [7/15]
This is why job listings for "general labor" often worry me. No description, right? So it's basically preying on anyone who needs money so desperately right now that they don't care what the job is, and putting out the message that you shouldn't care what you do for money. [8/ ]
"Four shifts available starting 5:30, 6:30, 7:00 and 3:00(pm)."

So each of these 2 companies needs like 6 people to start doing whatever it is at 5:30 am, and then another in an hour, and then another set half an hour after that, and an afternoon shift of a dozen. [9/15]
That's an interesting set of disposable staffing needs. Strong, healthy warm bodies mostly concentrated around availability in the conventional working day, with some into the evening, in a volume that's certainly not a tiny mom & pop. [10/15]
I actually would be willing to bet these jobs are, like, amazon delivery in your own vehicle, or personal shopper, and the $11-12 an hour is only for hours the GPS implant they'll provide^W^W^W^W^W your phone reports you as moving in ways it identifies as "general labor." [11/15]
So you'd "clock in" for your shift, and then maybe get one delivery all day, which takes 74 minutes, so you get $13.50 before taxes come out. And if you were to complain, they'd say "Dude! We said *hard workers* rewarded. Work harder." [12/15]
"Overtime available."

Of course it is, but I bet you never actually hit it because gig economy. [13/15]
This is all just the tip of the iceberg, of course. But ask yourself, as you think about why you may have the day off today: what is the labor cost of the things you appreciate in life? Who does that labor? On what terms? Is that how you think it should be? [14/15]
As a consumer, you are a major player in this equation, and the time you take to imagine yourself applying for "general labor" jobs and thinking about the ramifications of your choices really does matter. [15/15 ]

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Abby Franquemont 🇺🇸🇵🇪

Abby Franquemont 🇺🇸🇵🇪 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @abbysyarns

Sep 7, 2018
All this "is it a coup?" talk makes me think about the times I've suggested folks might wanna google "autogolpe" or "self-coup" because, come on, people.
"A self-coup (or autocoup, from the Spanish autogolpe) is a form of putsch or coup d'état in which a nation's leader, despite having come to power through legal means, dissolves or renders powerless the national legislature and unlawfully assumes extraordinary powers..."
I mean I think we could actually dispute whether or not a tampered election is "by legal means" but I'm willing to grant it.

My point is, a case can be made that the actual coup took place in 2016, and now we're living under the regime that took power then.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 31, 2018
I hear this shit about my work all the time but let’s try it on a few other jobs.

If you’re getting paid to provide medical care, you shouldn’t be providing medical care, amirite?

If you’re getting paid to be a cop, bad call, you should do it free, right?

And so on.
People always respond to that pushback, though, with insistence that cops are doctors are important. I always wonder: do they think that’s gonna make professional creatives WANT to continue the discussion?

So at that point I usually ask the artist what THEY do for work.
The amazing thing I usually discover? They’re not working in meaningful essential jobs like nobly being a doctor, either. They think their work deserves pay. Just not mine.

Anyway, the point is, all work deserves compensation.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 23, 2018
Have folks read this? I found it a really well-written piece that gets to the heart of why "racism" doesn't mean what many people think it does.

I feel like @SheWritesToLive does an incredible job answering questions people are *about* to ask, first.

medium.com/@shewritestoli…
I shared this article elseweb yesterday, and one person asked me how I could share it when I am obviously a white person -- am I saying I'm racist?

The answer is, basically, yes -- whether I want to be or not, because I benefit from all the structural aspects. [2/5]
The very first moment that this struck me was when I was a little kid, and I lived through a measles outbreak that killed a lot of my indigenous friends who had never had the chance to be vaccinated -- a thing that was just *assumed* for me as a white US-born person. [3/]5
Read 5 tweets
Aug 23, 2018
Hey @gmail, what the hell are you doing with my inbox? Why did you just present me with a 3-day-old email as if it were brand new? Is this Facebook-style "top stories" for my inbox? If so, get it the fuck out of there, for fuck's sake. I want my email chronological. The end.
I damn well know I received it 3 days ago. We had an email exchange and I'm not trying to get in the last word after 6 rounds when the last reply was closure of the thread. Where's the setting to just show me my email without fucking with it for no reason?
And before anybody gets all "well it's free email," no, it isn't -- this is a paid account.
Read 6 tweets
Jul 5, 2018
This is a point I often make about my oldest ancestors who came to the New World from England in 1638: they were not immigrating, they were colonizing, in the name of the very empire they felt was treating them unfairly.
The well documented 1638 ancestor had a wife and 2 small children. He was a minister, and basically signed on to be the minister for a for-profit colonizing expedition to the Massachusetts Bay Colony. He died at sea, and his wife got his plot of land in a brand new town...
His wife was the sister of the guy who owned the ship. It was a business venture for people who had significant privilege as it was — he was a well educated minister who owned land, and stood to lose it if he stayed where he was.
Read 13 tweets
Jun 28, 2018
People who don't understand #spinning yarn by hand, aka #handspinning, think a spinning wheel works if the drive wheel turns. And that wheels are easy to build. I mean, how hard could it be? They're totally for women, so they're obviously not really technology.
These thoughts brought to you by yet another morning waking up to an email asking if someone should spend $300 on a non-working "antique" that someone says "works great," because new wheels people recommend start in the $500-600 range.

[more]
Functioning new wheels cost that because that's what it costs to build them reliably and bring them to market.

Could you build your own? people also ask often. Maybe. But you need to already have all the tools and already know how spinning wheels actually work.

[more]
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(