The #postmodern spell that many who claim activism in the Muslim community have fallen under is no better displayed by the manner in which some "celebrity" actors attacked perceived power structures. In fact, nothing could be more post-modern than to see the world almost
exclusively through the lens of power. As a result, these self-proclaimed activists, who also attempt to claim Islamic orthodoxy and legitimacy, seek to supplant the very authoritarian power structures they claim to be fighting against with their own brand of authoritarianism:
inclusivity. One one hand they wail and gnash their nails and teeth over a variety of power structures such as #patriarchy, sexism, etc. Some even has even been some claim to truth in their observations but sadly their tactics are closer to slash and burn than to any discernable
strategy outside of "raging against the machine". This is partly due to the confusing nature of #postmodernity, which, as Leonard Hawes writes in his 1992 article, "Postmodernism and Power/Control", he states:
"[we live in] a world whose familiar systems and structures are changing at such a dizzying pace that obsolescence seems to be displacing history, style seems to be displacing memory".
Of course, as par for the course, the postmodern Muslim activist loathes history and anything that either came from it or was birthed in it. Their attempts at laying claim to Islamic legitimacy as constantly foiled (at least to those either in the know or those who give a damn
about Islamic orthodox morals, ethics, and beliefs) by the fact that they simultaneously detest the very tradition they claim to adhere to. The result is not only a Frankensteinian Islam (or rather, Muslim) but also, speaking purely from a practical point of view, ineffectual.
They seldom give Islam a chance to speak to them, advise them, or counsel them as to how one might best convince an opponent of the error of their ways and perhaps, most important of all, is this even pleasing to God.
It is this last point that is so troublesome in that the postmodern Muslim activist seems to be almost entirely impervious to Revelation, either woefully ignorant of its dictates or shamefully disregarding of it.
And if we're not asking ourselves, "how is this pleasing to God" or "perhaps this is DISpleasing to God", then how is our raison d'être for entering into politics or the public sphere going to be blessed let alone be sanctioned with Divine success?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In discussing the topic of postmodernism today with a colleague we arrived at a conclusion that the main opposition to #polygyny in today's postmodern world - including from Muslims - is rooted in the notion that (a) polygyny is a right
that men exclusively enjoy and (b) that men may enjoy that right unabashedly (that is, having legitimate sexual relationships with another woman).
The reason we touched on polygyny, a marital practice very few Muslims enjoin, is because of its "controversial" status in the minds
of those who claim #Islam to be a misogynistic religion. A claim now held by many Muslims who've been infected with postmodern sensibilities and methods of interpretation.
Our challenge to this was thus: postmodernism would tell us in general, and women in particular,
There are few topics more sensitive than sexual ethics in the Muslim community. This can undoubtedly be explained, admittedly in part, due to the secularization of the Muslim mind, particularly in the West.
The result of this secularization process cannot be better seen in the way Muslims, especially younger Muslims, simultaneously perceive that there is a god whilst at the same time denying that same god any authority over their lives.
One particular manifestation of this is what I now dub the “low hanging fruit” syndrome.
What I mean by low hanging fruit is the increasing tendency for younger Muslims to delay marriage while at the same time engaging in fornication.
"#Modernism can be characterized as the forceful imposition of rational administrative procedures into all facets of everyday life. Its subjects — you and I as individuated identities — crave both protection and authority.
You and I search for some measure of refuge in a totalized, secularized myth, a grand meta-narrative that accounts for everything, and this tendency towards #totalitarianism is worldwide.
The concern of the United States over its loss of market share in the service industries, and its concern over the quality of work by its subjects, are only symptoms of a much more pervasive and deeply rooted historical condition.
When analyzing our predicament today (for me, “we” is both non-Black #postcolonial peoples, Muslims, as well as #AfricanAmericans) I have made the observation that we are so highly manipulated by the dominant culture and its post-colonial psychology
and institutions that it’s akin to Abbot in the classic skit, “Who’s On First?”.
By this I mean that we have been confused and then directed to focus on the puppet show and to pay very little attention to the puppet master. But the insidious nature of this psychology is not simply to *what* we pay attention to but *how*.
Once upon a time, the so-called “inner world” used to be one’s relationship with God, or some other higher power/spiritual tradition. In relation to this, I was asked recently why the crisis of poverty is not only so persistent in America but also so rampant,
one must consider the retreat of religion from the public and private space. Our private spaces are no longer concerned with the Almighty but with, what Paul Roberts calls, “our aspirations and hopes, our identities and secret cravings, our anxieties and our boredom”.
Simply put, the poor and underprivileged are having to compete with our aspirations for upward mobility, our veganism or yogaism or perhaps even our pornography addictions, and perhaps most of all, our anxieties about what we don’t have and our boredom with what we are already