Thread by @LizWebsterSBF

In 2015 parliament voted to allow advisory referendum. Because it was advisory no safeguards were attached

In 2016 HMG insisted vote was binding & opposition nor media challenged this lie.

BBC immediately reported we have left &opposition called for trigger of A50.

Referendum was advisory. As much as having false title deed to your property this matters

Supreme ct ruled in Miller that parliament had to decide.

PM didn’t ask parliament if they want to leave she merely asked if they will give her power to notify - once a decision is made.

So having tricked Parliament and electorate into believing illusion parliament had decided, the PM sent the the letter to the EU.

Lord Justice gross held PM decided to strip rights of over 500bn people all based on fraud.

When PM made decision to leave she relied solely on the result of the #frauderendum.

Imagine the chair of a parish council deciding to leave a county council based on a referendum which was permeated with dark money and propaganda? With no impact assessments or plans.

Add to this fact the chair would be deciding on the status of People not officially documented in the parish.

That one person can make a decision is terrifying enough, but to make a mammoth decision with no evidence or reporting is inconceivable.