In 2015 parliament voted to allow advisory referendum. Because it was advisory no safeguards were attached

In 2016 HMG insisted vote was binding & opposition nor media challenged this lie.

BBC immediately reported we have left &opposition called for trigger of A50. Referendum was advisory. As much as having false title deed to your property this matters

Supreme ct ruled in Miller that parliament had to decide.

PM didn’t ask parliament if they want to leave she merely asked if they will give her power to notify - once a decision is made.

This decision of PM which impacts on every EU citizen is unconstitutional.

There’s been no due diligence, no parliamentary decision and, as she admits in the letter, it’s based purely on the referendum.

EC have confirmed it was #frauderendum.

The decision is tainted.

https://twitter.com/abcpoppins/status/1033648633491677185

We embarked on @A50Challenge with the route map below, in pursuit of the decision. We expected to have to go to full hearing to find it.

It’s super *bonus* court took the opportunity to nail the decision down.

It now makes way for new challenges free of time bar.

1. The decision to leave the EU was NOT made by the electorate nor by Parliament but by the PM alone relying on the result of the referendum and for purely political reasons: this is in breach of the U.K’s constitution. 2. Supreme Ct in Miller didn't specify how the UK should leave the EU, and the Government has obfuscated to create an illusion of a Parliamentary decision. However in reality the Notification Act 17 changed nothing. PM always had power to notify once a valid decision was made.

Parliament voted in 2015 to hold a referendum. No checks, balances or threshold were applied bc it was advisory: merely a temperature test.

An international clique of businessmen and politicians then built mega campaign using dark money, psychops & lies to drown remain.

https://twitter.com/Anna_Soubry/status/1025283303799234561

This on a backdrop of the PM, David Cameron, promising to deliver the result of the referendum, despite the fact it was unlawful for him to do so in the event leave won.

Shocking as this may seem, Cameron's remain credentials aren't above reproach.

express.co.uk/news/politics/…

Thread on #A50challenge

Where is the decision?

When agreeing to give permission for a Judicial Review recently on whether Article 50 can be revoked, the Scottish court highlighted points which made our ears prick up.

1/6 Firstly they dealt with permission. The government is relying heavily on the fact we brought the claim out of the 3 month rule for Judicial Review. The court makes it clear, matters of constitutional importance deserve exceptional status and should be heard.

2/6