Read on Twitter
2 yrs ago I suggested to @bigfatsurprise for an overview of systematic reviews on #LCHF @bigfatsurprise said "I will go wherever the science leads"
@MEJLean & his colleagues have done it.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
The methodology is sound - meaning the conclusions are robust /1
@MEJLean & his colleagues have done it.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
The methodology is sound - meaning the conclusions are robust /1
TL;DR: high quality meta-analyses reported little or no difference between diets.
"Publication acceptance & citations appear to favour apparently larger effect sizes above methodological quality.”
Mirrors our recent experience in this area:
"Publication acceptance & citations appear to favour apparently larger effect sizes above methodological quality.”
Mirrors our recent experience in this area:
https://twitter.com/dnunan79/status/1037389383555592193
Well done @MEJLean and co. Great use of appropriate & robust methodology to answer a question, that is currently generating a lot of noise.
Showing us noise is outweighing the signal and no diet more superior than another.
Here’s one example where ‘evidence-based’ applies.
Showing us noise is outweighing the signal and no diet more superior than another.
Here’s one example where ‘evidence-based’ applies.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
