In all the hubbub about the WA and the future relationship, it's easy to neglect the bit in-between
2/
Tomorrow's event aims to help rectify this, not least because it's got various problems that need to be discussed and debated
3/
I'd argue that the 'membership minus/Full Monty' (h/t @piris_jc) model provisionally accepted by the UK and EU in the WA is the least-worst option
4/
It means no double transition for the UK, a more comprehensive level of reliability for citizens and businesses, plus sets out a base from which to negotiate the future relationship
5/
However, it comes with challenges/problems too
6/
I've talked before about the extension problems here (blogs.surrey.ac.uk/politics/2018/…) but as matters stand now, we might have an even-less manageable cliff-edge at end 2020 than we have in March 2019
7
But there are also issues around balancing transition with the parallel negotiations on the future relationship and on third-state agts (as @DavidHenigUK@hhesterm will discuss)
8/
Plus it doesn't even fully resolve the interim arrangements for Ireland/Northern Ireland (as @MaryCMurphy is going to explore tomorrow)
9/
Finally, there's a real Q of democracy here. How legitimate is it for UK to have all of membership, w/o voting or full representation rights?
That's only partly balanced by whether it's legitimate for non-EU member to have such rights, but not really
10/
Clearly, one could argue this away as a passing issue, but if extension does come back as a live issue (as I think it must), then it becomes ever more of a problem, for all involved
11/
Only legally-compliant way through this that I can see would be a WA with a post-dated withdrawal of UK from EU (at end 2020), so it remains a full member until then.
But looks almost impossible to consider in current political climate (and raises Qs of respecting #EUref)
12/
So, no real answers, but I think it's important to raise the Qs
Possibly more for me than for you, let's try to pull this week together a bit:
1/
Let's start with the EU side
Having largely kept heads down during conference season, yesterday's Tusk/Varadkar presser demonstrated that EU is keeping the pressure on
2/
The tension seems to be between COM/EUCO and IE, as @pmdfoster explained well yesterday: IE making conciliatory noises, central EU bodies pushing EU integrity line
Back in Sept, there was much talk about this being a crunch point in the UK debate, as May would come under fire for Chequers and there would be scope for changes/realignments/whatever
2/
Certainly that first bit has happened, with numerous op-eds over the weekend and assorted fringe events (inc. yesterday's Johnson speech)
3/