In Sept. 2017, senator Bob Corker announced his surprise retirement. The next month, Jeff Flake followed suit, & Lindsey Graham warmed to Trump after a round of golf. All 3 were vocal Trump critics & all 3 had used Smartech—hacked by Russia—for emails. thestate.com/news/politics-… 1/
2/ In August 2017, when Bob Corker questioned Trump's competence, Trump responded with a tweet stating that Corker had asked him (Trump) whether he (Corker) should run for office again and ended the tweet with "Tennessee not happy!" reuters.com/article/us-usa…
3/ On 9/11/17, Corker suggested he might retire and acknowledged that he and Trump may have discussed his election plans over golf. cnn.com/2017/09/11/pol…
3/ Here is Bob Corker's 9/26/17 statement announcing his retirement.
8/ Smoking Gun report from August 2016 stating that emails from various other Republicans who used Smartech had made their way onto DC Leaks. thesmokinggun.com/documents/inve…
9/ As for senator Lindsey Graham, he was once very tough on Trump, stating in July 2017 that "there will be holy hell to pay" if "Jeff Sessions is fired." vox.com/policy-and-pol…
10/ In October 2017, Trump took Lindsey Graham golfing, and Graham began praising Trump. thestate.com/news/politics-…
11/ Article from December 2017, stating: "One of Trump's most vocal critics in the Senate has quickly turned into one of his best friends — and people are shocked." businessinsider.com/why-lindsey-gr…
12/ In August 2018, Lindsey Graham said Trump should replace Jeff Sessions after all because their relationship is "beyond repair." rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
16/ Reuters article dated 10/25/17 discussing the ramifications of "Jeff Flake's surprise decision to drop out of next year's senate race." reuters.com/article/us-ari…
17/ NPR article dated 10/24/17 stating that "Arizona Senator Jeff Flake, a Trump critic, will not seek reelection." npr.org/2017/10/24/559…
18/ Please note that, despite their decisions to retire, both Corker and Flake have remained (at least at times) vocally critical of Trump. I do not know if the hacking of Smartech is related to their resignations but it seems worth investigating. I hope Mueller is doing that.
19/ For that matter, I don't know if Graham is being blackmailed either. Again, my point is that it's worth at least investigating.
20/ Please note that I received input for parts of this Thread from @soychicka and another Twitter friend who wishes to remain anonymous. #StrongerTogether
21/ I should also mention that senator Bob Corker was major of Chattanooga Tennessee when Ohio's 2004 presidential election results were routed to a server hosted by Smartech in Chattanooga, TN. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Corker
22/ Article discussing the routing of Ohio's 2004 election results to Smartech in Chattanooga, TN. harpers.org/archive/2012/1…
23/ Another article about Smartech's role in the 2004 presidential election in Ohio. wired.com/2007/04/did-oh…
25/ Many members of the Bush administration also used Smartech for their emails, 22 million of which were deleted during Bush's tenure, but later recovered in 2009. They have never seen the light of day. snopes.com/fact-check/g-w…
26/ Per @CraigUnger (editor Vanity Fair, author "Boss Rove"), "Rove and more than EIGHTY OTHER WHITE HOUSE STAFFERS [during the Bush years] had their emails hosted on ... [the] SmarTech servers." harpers.org/blog/2012/09/_…
31/ “Question Posed: How Did Bob Corker Go from ‘Dead Broke’ to $69 Million Net Worth During 11 Years in U.S. Senate?” tennesseestar.com/2017/12/23/que…
Study shows that people of all political persuasions are willing to modify their beliefs based on corrective info from reliable sources, but “subjects ‘re-believed’ the false info when retested a week later.” 1/ news.northeastern.edu/2018/06/18/tir…
2/ The author of the article says It may help to warn people in advance that they are likely to forget the correction bc “this helps them mentally tag the bogus information as false.”
3/ It’s also “important that the corrective information be repeated as frequently, and with even greater clarity, than the myth.”
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but elections have been electronically suspect starting long before the Trump/Russia scandal. This article is lulling folks into a false sense of security, which is dangerous. Domestic hackers & insiders were always an equal threat. 1/
I agree, tho not enuf time (and 0 political will) to do this in Nov. Wish it were different. For now I hope to stop states from doubling up on electronics w/ touchscreen ballot markers. Using electronics to count votes is bad enuf. Having them mark our ballots too is nuts. 1/
Nuts except for those who are unable to hand mark their ballots. Once you have hand marked paper ballots they can be either scanned or hand counted (my preference) or both. 2/
Any time u put a machine between the voter and the paper record of voter intent there is an opportunity for programming mischief. Here is just the latest example.: 3/
I’m hoping some of the cyber experts who signed the letter about the risks of using cellular modems to transfer election results can answer this question. Thx! @philipbstark@SEGreenhalgh@rad_atl@jhalderm
Seeing as no one has answered yet, I will say that even if the cellular modems CAN be configured to bypass the internet, we should not have to blindly trust that vendors or whoever else is hired to set them up will do that.
Kathy Rogers, the face & voice of @ESSVote, which has installed CELLULAR MODEMS in tabulators in WI & FL, is cozying up to @DHSgov which refuses to advise states to remove the modems despite a letter from 30 cyber experts & EI groups stating it should do so. #CorruptElections 1/
The notion that cellular modems affect only “unofficial” results is bogus bc, among other reasons, in certain jurisdictions, unofficial results become the official results once added to absentees & provisionals—sometimes w/o ever comparing them to the precinct results tapes! 1/
And Wisconsin doesn’t even require that counties publicly post the results tapes so that the public itself can make this comparison! (I don’t know about Florida, Michigan, & Illinois.) 2/
Thus, we must simply trust that someone trustworthy is conducting this due diligence. In Johnson County, Kansas, the County acknowledged that it does NOT conduct this basic due diligence. 3/