1/ Let’s go through Manafort’s plea agreement. (justice.gov/sco)
2/ Manafort agrees not to appeal his EDVA matters. Each count to which he is pleading guilty carries a maximum term of 5 years (some of these counts “group” under the federal sentencing guidelines).
3/ Manafort is factually stipulating as TRUE the facts alleged in the EDVA remaining charges and the Statement of the Offense to this plea (will review later in this thread). The Gov’t agrees to dismiss FBAR, FARA, money laundering and other charges in consideration.
4/ The plea sets forth the sentencing range under the federal guideline computation: 210-262 months WITHOUT the benefit of the 5k.1.1 reduction, which we will discuss next.
5/ Manafort has agreed to provide the following cooperation, in exchange for which, the Gov’t will file a request for a downward departure of his sentence under the federal sentencing guidelines under 5K1.1.
Here is Section 5K1.1 under the US Sentencing Guidelines.
7/ Getting a 5K1.1 departure can be a golden ticket if the Government and court agree that the defendant’s cooperation was substantial. The court may reduce the sentence substantially below the guideline range. (ussc.gov/sites/default/…)
8/ So, backing up ... Manafort has agreed to provide “undercover activities” 👀 and it has been reported that Manafort has been cooperating with Mueller’s team for some time already.
9/ I do apologize but I must pause thread for a while to catch my breath. Lupus pneumonitis slows me down. Will be back in a bit.
10/ The plea sets out the standard waivers agreed to by defendants taking federal pleas.
11/ The forfeiture provisions are quite extensive.
15/ No state prosecuting authorities were made party to this agreement. Manafort remains liable under state laws. But what is very odd is this agreement is not binding on the US Attorney’s Office. I’ve never encountered this & will defer to others more knowledgable to interpret.
16/ Let’s now turn to the statement of the offense: What did Manafort know, and when? Count 1: Conspiracy Against the US. Manafort and his co-conspirators furthered a conspiracy in violation of FARA law.
17/ The conspiracy was accomplished via Manafort’s lobbying firm. “From 2006 to 2015, Manafort led a multimillion dollar lobbying campaign in the US, at the direction of” (Putin puppet) Yanukovych.
18/ I posted this to Facebook a week before the NYT ran its Ukraine ledger story, on August 6, 2016.
19/ If you could have seen my dining room that summer ...
21/ Lobbyists know no political loyalty. They go where the money takes them, and Manafort bought some powerful DC lobbyists. He also coopted members of the media to put forth propaganda which was counter to US interests in Ukraine. They used anti-Semitic messaging.
22/ Manafort “and others” set up an NGO which retained US firms and falsely represented that the NGO was not run by Ukraine’s Party of Regions (Yanukovych).
23/ Federal prosecutors weigh charges against Democratic powerbroker in Manafort-linked probe cnn.com/2018/09/14/pol…
29/ Trump’s own DOJ attorney Michael Dreeben said Manafort had served as Trump’s campaign chairman.
“He had long-standing ties to Russia-backed politicians,” Dreeben told Jackson. “Did they provide back channels to Russia? Investigators will naturally look at those things.”
30/ The money laundering took place between 2006 and 2016, which means some of these crimes occurred while Manafort served on Trump’s campaign.
These facts are not alleged in Manafort’s indictment. #Firtash 🤣🤣🤣
Let’s continue ...
33/ Manafort used offshore and overseas accounts to hide funds and he designated funds as “loans” rather than income to avoid paying income taxes. He misled his bookkeeper and tax accountants.
34/ Forfeiture facts detailed again.
35/ The witness tampering facts are specified. Recall, Konstantin Kilimnik is affiliated with the Kremlin GRU.
36/ Do not let anyone persuade you that this has nothing to do with Trump or his campaign:
42/ Manafort conspired to commit bank fraud in the EDVA and in the DC circuits. Of interest is there is no mention of loans from Tom Barack’s First Republic Bank. 🤔
48/ Manafort received $16M in loans made by Fed Savings Bank, where Trump fmr campaign adviser Steve Calk serves as CEO cbsnews.com/news/report-ex…
49/ In a nutshell, the Kremlin planted Manafort into the Trump campaign. When he was discovered and hounded by USIC, Trump and the GOP arranged to pay Manafort with a golden parachute by setting up bogus loans for millions of dollars. Manafort’s cases are just the beginning.
50/ To be clear: USIC knew about Manafort long before he joined the Trump campaign. When I say “when he was discovered,” I mean when Ukraine went public with the ledgers.
Senator Collins is waning on about interest groups against Kavanaugh but IGNORES dark money interest groups in support of Kavanaugh.
Senator Collins references Kavanaugh’s judicial record. She disagrees w notion he will eliminate ACA protections, pointing to his dissent in Holder. She argues that his views on severability is narrow.
She addresses the concern about Kavanaugh protecting the POTUS. She argues that Kavanaugh defers to legislative authority. She argues Clinton got 2 justices confirmed while under Whitewater investigation and 3 Nixon appointees ruled against Nixon ruled against Nixon.
1/ Here is what really bothers me about Kavanaugh: he feels he deserves everything he has and will have because he has earned it. This is a uniquely Calvinist-origin ideology. It is also precisely one of the things which **theologically** distinguishes Catholics from Protestants.
2/ The implications are enormous if one considers the reverse scenario: those to whom life has brought hardship are unworthy, lazy, and have not “earned” their way. Protestant-Calvinist thinking is deeply entrenched in American culture, especially at Yale. christianity.com/church/denomin…
3/ If Kavanaugh adhered to Catholic teaching, he would have by this age internalized that it is mandatory we give a preferential option to the poor. He would practice the Corporal Works of Mercy. He would NOT insist that his success is due to his own merit or worth.
A new article discussing Deripaska, Steele, Waldman, and Assange by @IgnatiusPost requires some serious unpacking. Christopher Steele worked for Deripaska in 2012. (washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-gop…)
Deripaska was interviewed by the FBI in 2015, 2016, and possibly in 2017.
In 2009, while Mueller was FBI Director, the FBI conducted a covert outreach to Deripaska to locate missing CIA contractor Robert Levinson. (I believe this was accomplished through John McCain).
), and dissect the “Kavanaugh Catholic” — with the caveat I, too am a Catholic.
2/ First, we all witnessed Kavanaugh last night make several public pronouncements, to wit:
“I was a virgin.”
“I was busy studying.”
“I was the Captain of my football team.”
“I have never sexually assaulted anyone, ever.”
3/ Kavanaugh had his wife by his side, who vouched for him throughout. He also claimed to have spent his career as a champion for women and women’s issues. Neither Kavanaugh nor his wife (whom he met after high school) addressed the bevy of mounting evidence against him.
In accordance w the Violence Against Women & Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2013 (“VAWA 2013”), officers and/or investigators may not require victims of sexual assault to submit to a polygraph test or other truth-telling devices.
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE
POLICY AND TRAINING CONTENT GUIDELINES — The Senate Judiciary Committee is doing everything WRONG.
The unwarranted exertion of control by @ChuckGrassley over a putative sexual assault victim violates every single guideline recommendation of the Intl Assoc of Chiefs of Police.