The important point to keep in mind regarding section 33 of the Charter of Rights & Freedoms is why it was included. Think about what was going on at the time and why the Charter was even created.
Sect. 33 is a white supremacy tool that was included to make white men feel safe.
Now that this fact has been said, let’s get to the heart of addressing the attempt to abuse power in order to maintain white supremacy.
It’s 2018, time to rule section 33 unconstitutional when used to subvert Canadians’ inalienable rights to a free & democratic society.
Some people learn from them and some people don’t.
During the time when then Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau and other white male elected Representatives were working on ensuring that underrepresented and marginalized Communities were protected
the following was happening in Canada and the world (to name a few things)
👉🏿Residential Schools were still operating throughout Canada (the Residential school system was the model white supremacists & separatists used to carry out Apartheid)
Now with this ‘civil rights’ legislation that ‘left winger’ Trudeau was trying to enact, many white men and women were concerned that they now couldn’t discriminate against the “coloureds and the Jews” as it should be their right to do so and more importantly they would be held…
accountable if they did!
So instead of making everyone accountable, the Charter placed limits on Government including Elected Representatives and Employees, for their acts that limit people’s rights and discriminate against them.
It wasn’t until when then Premier Peter Lougheed (his Grandfather and former Senator, James Lougheed was a known racist) suggested what we now know to be section 33 of the Charter that the elected white male representatives felt comfortable signing on to allow the Charter #TOpoli
The attempt to use section 33 to overturn the Public’s Rights has to be looked at as contracts between the Public, the Government and between Elected Representatives and their ability to use a #RightsRebate to maintain white supremacy to the exclusion of…
The law is not limited by the words provided, intent of the law must be looked at.
If the purpose of Section 1 of the Charter is to be interpreted in a plain language way that limits on rights are acceptable if those limits can be justified in a " free and democratic society"…
…then we must expect that a free and democratic society exists in Canada- including Toronto as it relates to how we determine what is necessary for effective representation to ensure that we all have the ability to live thrive.
IMO, that is to say, if ‘upholding’ Charter rights re sections 2, 7-15 were so obstructive to Canadian values then Government would have the right to invoke the powers and protection of section 33.
What does the world understand Canadian values to be?
Is anything Toronto is doing to better provide effective representation to its residents, by having 47 electoral Wards, against a free & democratic society &/or against Canadian values?
The Court has the power to deem actions unconstitutional.
From my Mayoral Candidacy perspective, I have entered into a contract in good faith expecting the contract to be fulfilled with Toronto & Ontario fulfilling its responsibilities &obligations under the contact. #ElectionTO
Good faith is an essential part of a contract.
The City of Toronto is a Corporation. When Candidates signed on to be entered as nominations to be certified by the Clerk, we did so in good faith.
IMO, the applicable cases include Bhasin v Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 (good faith - contract law entering into contracts in good faith) expanding on these principles as they relate to legislation, clear communication and understanding of legislation or outlined information at the time…
to make informed actions to proceed by a designated deadline and the enforcement of legislation; Sattva v. Capital Corp. v Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53 (“In terms of contractural interpretation, the unanimous Sattva v. Capital Corp. v Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53 Decision…
…both clarified and fundamentally changed how Canadian Courts interpret contracts.”
The effect on #accessibility & #inclusion in a free & democratic society cannot go unchallenged. Note that this thread forms the basis of my legal challenge to Bill 31 and to Bill 5.
Affect/effect of Gov’t actions on our electoral process impedes our rights of being a free & democratic society. Premier Ford’s response to Justice Belobaba’s Decision & to Toronto is not responsible. He can’t demonstrably justify his need to invoke sect 33.
I share my legal argument here because I believe that together we succeed. If anyone wants to borrow any aspect of what I raise in order to protect the Public’s rights and interests please do so. Just remember where it came from and don’t try to claim it as your own…
Respect the work that Black women do every day to protect the Public’s rights and interests. Know that the solutions and ideas we regularly put forward are claimed by others as their own innovation with no credit where credit is due…
…We’re not necessarily looking for credit of our work, we just don’t want you to take credit, claim & profit from our work, ideas, solutions and innovation if we’re all not profiting.
This also serves as public statements I make re #Bill31 & #Bill5
I’m writing to you as your TORONTO Mayoral Candidate because the media & supporters of status quo are doing their very best to exclude Black Candidates voices- as usual.
Have you been co-signing maintaining the status quo?
Have you turned away from your public chants of “end racism, stop racists, etc...” during this Election period and are instead prepared to publicly/quietly push what the establishment has been pushing just to get the results that you say you’re against?
I’m writing to you as your Mayoral Candidate because the media & supporters of the status quo are doing their very best to exclude Black Candidates voices- as usual.
Have you been co-signing maintaining the status quo?
Have you turned away from the public calls for “inclusion, end racism, stop racists, etc...” during this Election period & are instead prepared to publicly/quietly push what the establishment has been pushing just to get the results that we’re all against?
I’m writing to you as your Mayoral Candidate because the media & supporters of the status quo are doing their very best to exclude Black Candidates voices- as usual.
Have you been co-signing maintaining the status quo?
Have you shaken hands & made agreements against the interests of BIPoC, specifically Black Candidates for your own gain and/or to maintain the status quo?
Are you amplifying voices presented to you by the establishment?
Have you turned away from your public chants of “end discrimination islamophobia racism, stop racists, etc...” during this Election period & are instead prepared to publicly/quietly push what the establishment has been pushing just to get the results that you’re against?
Dear people who identify as having #disabilities fam,
I’m writing to you as your Mayoral Candidate because the media & supporters of status quo are doing their very best to exclude Black Candidates voices- as usual.
Have you been co-signing maintaining the status quo?
Have you turned away from your public chants of “#accessibilityNOW, #inclusion, #equity, #universalDesign, etc...” during this Election period & are instead prepared to publicly/quietly push what the establishment has been pushing just to get the results you’re against?
I’m writing to you as your Mayoral Candidate because the media & supporters of status quo are doing their very best to exclude Black Candidates voices- as usual.
Have you been co-signing maintaining the status quo?
Have you turned away from your public chants of “end homophobia, end transphobia, end discrimination, etc...” during this Election period and are instead prepared to publicly/quietly push what the establishment has been pushing just to get the results that you say you’re against?
I’m writing to you as your Mayoral Candidate because the media & supporters of status quo are doing their very best to exclude Black Candidates voices- as usual.
Have you shaken hands and made agreements against the interests of ‘intersectionality’, specifically Black Candidates in order to maintain the status quo?
Are you amplifying voices presented to you by the establishment?
Have you turned away from your public chants of “intersectionality, end racism, stop Nazis, etc...” during this Election period and are instead prepared to publicly/quietly push what the establishment has been pushing just to get the results that you say you’re against?