In the “Case Number” search column, type 156006V and click “Get Case.”
Then learn that the parents of Kavanaugh’s accuser were defendants in a court case his mother presided over.
The parents of Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser were defendants in a court case Kavanaugh’s mother ruled on 22 years ago. That’s 13 years after the alleged incident in question took place.
I’m no legal professional. But from what it looks like, Brett Kavanaugh’s mother did not rule in favor of the parents of his accuser.
We’re starting to learn a lot about Kavanaugh’s accuser.
Christine Blasey Ford:
—can’t recall details of alleged incident
—has family negatively affected by Kavanaugh’s mom
—donates to the DNC, Democrat politicians and causes
—is an anti-Trump activist
—scrubbed online presence
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Interviewing Ford’s unnecessary 2. This still doesn’t prove anything 3. Not submitting evidence when your demands aren’t met is a refusal 4. Her lawyers never gave her this option, SJC did 5. Her ex says her fear of flying is fake 6. Polygraphs are meaningless & can be rigged
If Dr. Ford (& her legal team) feels like her credibility was challenged, that’s because she was never a credible accuser to begin with. Her claim was flimsy & riddled with contradictions. She offered no hard evidence or corroborating witnesses. Her testimony was odd & contrived.
Ford’s ex submitted a statement under penalty of perjury accusing her of lying when she said she never coached another person on polygraph procedure. He mentioned Monica McLean as someone she had done this with. Then we find out she’s her BFF, former FBI, & attended her hearing?
I’m legitimately interested to see how this week plays out.
As the credibility of all 3 Kavanaugh accusers continues to plummet, Democrats would be insane to roll out a fourth accuser with a baseless claim.
That being said, what’s their next move?
Will they use the week desperately trying to substantiate the preexisting accuser claims?
Dems will likely spend the week desperately trying to pad the credibility of Kavanaugh’s accusers. If they can’t by Thursday, a new one will be rolled out to obstruct voting. If they aren’t taken seriously & Kavanaugh is still set to be confirmed on Friday, I pray for his safety.
I’m pretty sure this violates Twitter Terms of Service, for threatening violence against another, but will probably be overlooked regardless because it’s against a Republican.
Update: Millhiser’s fanatical rant about relentlessly stalking and harassing Republicans has also been added to the previously referenced Twitter Moment (above)
Keith Ellison said he turned down Karen Monahan's request for them to mutually address an investigator because he "left the relationship." While I understand why he would feel uncomfortable being around his ex, wouldn't it be worth it to clear his name? 🤔
At the start of the clip, he says "now let's talk about the current one that we're dealing with now," and is reminded by the moderator that her name is "Miss Monahan," almost like he can't keep track of how many accusers he has. There are only two that are known to the public. 🤔
This clip bothered me. As soon as Monahan was brought up, Ellison immediately adopted a tone that attempts to paint her as fanatical & compulsive. He also did the same thing to Amy L. Alexander in 2006, getting a restraining order against her & casting doubts on her mental health
Joe Biden publicly condemning misconduct, considering his documented history of it, makes me sick to my stomach.
Imagine being one of the women or children former VP Joe Biden groped, sniffed, or fondled, then watching him insincerely condemn aggressive predation in public.
I’m sure the reason his victims still remain silent is because of power and unspoken intimidation.