Thread by @ObamaTruth1

1/ #LiberalHypocrisy
#Q: What evidence is there that #ChristineBlaseyFord's accusations against #JudgeKavanaugh are purely political in nature? Let me start the list:
1. She claimed not to be politically motivated, yet she only provided her letter to #Democrats.

2. #DianeFeinstein, who received the original letter with the claims by #ChristineBlaseyFord, has refused to release the complete, unredacted letter.
3. #ChristineBlaseyFord claimed to want to desire anonymity..so how did a story (given only to the #Left) get leaked to the press?

4. #ChristineBlaseyFord claimed to want to remain anonymous...so why did she pay for a polygraph test long before this went public?
5. #ChristineBlaseyFord claims that there were two men in the room during the attack...so why did earlier versions have four men in the room?

6. #ChristineBlaseyFord claims to have been traumatized by the event...so why would she not have mentioned it to even one friend extemporaneously...and how could she possibly not remember exactly when or where this "event" happened?

7. #ChristineBlaseyFord claims she lacks a political animus, but basic research exposes this to be a lie. She's an ardent leftist opposed to Trump, has signed petitions resisting him, attended women's marches against Trump, donated only to leftists...Why deny political leanings?

8. Why would #ChristineBlaseyFord choose as her attorney a woman who is a leftist political activist, one who literally supported men accused of sexual attacks on women (#AlFranken, #SlickWilly) against credible women who were actually raped and assaulted? Politics or principle?

9. If #ChristineBlaseyFord wished for "her story" to be heard, why did her counsel first say she would be willing to testify and then go into hiding and refuse to testify despite all efforts by the Senate to accommodate, including a closed hearing in a non-disclosed location?

10. Why do #ChristineBlaseyFord'sr supporters point to #AnitaHill, saying she should not be questioned by old white men...yet, when given the chance to be questioned instead by a female counsel, she now insists on being questioned ONLY by these old white men? A: Optics/politics!

11. Why, when given a week's notice to testify re: something so important, is #ChristineBlaseyFord unable to make this date work...after 36 years of waiting to share her story? Does she need more time to find a SINGLE corroborating witness...or is it all about delaying the vote?

12. Why is that, no one...not a single witness, friend, acquaintance, schoolmate, fellow party goer...come forward to substantiate any part of what she claims happened...let alone that the alleged aggressor was in fact #JudgeKavanaugh? Is this at all believable?

13. Why was the one person who made claims trying to substantiate #ChristineBlaseyFord's assertions, by pointing to her own notes and memories of this tragic event...immediately exposed as fabricating every claim? Why would this happen...if not political?

14. Was the failed attempt to falsely create an extemporaneous "witness" one of the reasons that #ChristineBlaseyFord went into hiding? Is this why #ChristineBlaseyFord has become so uncooperative in simply sharing her story under oath?

15. Is there a logical reason for #ChristineBlaseyFord's unprecedented demand that she, the complainant, testify AFTER #JudgeKavanaugh, breaking all legal standards and protocols? It's far easier to create a narrative AFTER hearing the other side's defense. Maybe that's a factor?

16. Look at the fact pattern...vague, 36-year-old allegations, no clear date/location/homeowner, no witnesses, no corroboration, no extemporaneous support, provable political motivation. Is it any wonder why #Dems & #ChristineBlaseyFord don't want her to testify?
#TruthWins!
END/

This thread has some very interesting info:
1. Possibly sent same letter/accusations re: #JudgeGorsuch last year! It's an undocumented claim, putting it on same level as #ChristineBlaseyFord's claims.
2. Pic of her with a "Not My President" sign.
+ more...