Dr EM Profile picture
Sep 21, 2018 14 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Brilliant piece by Sabrinna Valisce who explores systemic societal gaslighting framing it within established Radical Feminist Theory and Praxis. aradfemtypes.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/sys…
The essay moves the abusive technique of gaslighting from the micro – interpersonal relationships and domestic violence – to the macro – the endemic abuse of women and global subjugation of women. #WarOnWomen
The techniques of Gaslighting are:
Blocking (or Jamming)
Diverting (the big switchero – what about____)
Countering (DARVO)
Trivialising and
Blocking can range from refusing to debate to the MSM refusing to report women’s views or a range of women’s views.
'Withholding is when the abuser purposely feigns forgetfulness, lack of understanding or refuses to acknowledge what happened'. On a macro-level an example is when the threat of male violence and sexual abuse is written off with ‘that never happens’ against all evidence.
Valisce outlines with regards to withholding that In Systemic Societal Gaslighting we see a rewriting of feminist history and events.
'Diverting is changing the subject entirely or shifting the focus'. Often it involves the domestic abuse tactic of DARVO – Deny, attack, reverse victim & offender.
Countering ‘calls the victim’s memory into question and often draws on prior incidents of gaslighting’. Countering is commonly understood as victim blaming.
Trivialising is as it says on the tin. We see this in systemic societal gaslighting when male violence against women is presented as isolated incidents.
Denial is often accompanied with mocking. Its just banter right? Was just a joke?
One thing I really like about Valisce’s analysis is that she is placing gaslighting alongside the feminist understanding of the male gaze.
Valisce delineates how porn culture has changed the male gaze, it has commodified all women and girls. Valisce posits that the male gaze combines with gaslighting in that it is the only lens which one is allowed to view the world.
‘This necessitates that women must rearrange our own experiences to align with the mainstream narratives of reality. Our realities thus become questionable falsehoods’.
Valisce’s argument seems to resonate with the silencing of women and the attempted forced acceptance of transgender ideology. Women are being commanded by men to abandon their perception of reality, instincts, feelings and boundaries.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Dr EM

Dr EM Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PankhurstEM

Oct 4, 2018
A detailed look at the U.K. Serious Case Review National Repository suggests to me that Susie Green of mermaids is making up statistics and in my opinion behaving unethically and in contradiction with the Samaritan guidelines around suicide.
This has come out of work @AlfredBelpaire has done and privately shared with me. The 'stats' Susie Green and another Mermaids mum are pushing, the sensationalist Guardian article do NOT agree with the research by GIDS of the Tavistock and Portman.
The GIDS evidence base is here: gids.nhs.uk/evidence-base
Read 6 tweets
Oct 3, 2018
This is a fabulous thread and was a brilliant project by three academics. This is very important and concerns knowledge, truth and teaching.
Who sent me this thread? I want to thank you but I can't find the notification.
Sokal squared set about to expose the sophistry and forgery of knowledge in academia, particularly 'grievance studies', and it has been marvellous. I was even dealing with this just this morning (see screen grab).
Read 16 tweets
Oct 3, 2018
This is in the comments section below. This Professor Emeritus of Applied Philosophy doesn't think that biological sex is real, that women are disadvantaged by systemic oppression based on biology. It is, frankly, batsh*t.
Prof.'s Stock rebuttal of five common arguments that men are women on their self declaration is beautiful. Proper reasoning and argument has returned to the room!
Read 5 tweets
Oct 2, 2018
According to @StopFundingHate talking about women's rights= hateful, speaking about safeguarding= hateful, biology= hateful, speaking of sexism= hateful, women defining themselves= hateful, advertising government consultation= hateful.
I'm starting to suspect @StopFundingHate haven't done the reading.
Are they really going to start a campaign telling women to just be nice? @StopFundingHate
Read 4 tweets
Sep 29, 2018
Jess is under the impression that women, and some men, meeting to discuss potential legislative changes is against UK law and council policies. Jess may have confused her anti-women feelings with actual legislation.
This is a personal favourite, Jess celebrating denying women their lawful rights by screaming 'mine' like a toddler. Thanks Jess, this really made me laugh.
There is a long heritage of women like Jess. Julia Bush has written a fantastic article on the women of the Anti-suffrage league bl.uk/votes-for-wome…
Read 8 tweets
Sep 28, 2018
Thread. I am very worried that the Girl Guides is creating an institution and climate which is conducive to abuse.
Those who wish to access victims will exploit situations and put themselves in positions where they are surrounded by children. It is why paedophiles entered the Catholic Church, sports coaching, gymnastics coaching, children’s hospitals and homes.
One is not going to get much access to children while working on an oil rig.
Read 31 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!