2/ Secondary conclusion: Despite parent #cryptonetworks retaining users, devs & value, the child forks trade at (puzzling) relative valuation premiums.
3/ To follow are graphs and conclusions from @alexhevans that are relevant to specific actors or ratios (if you're not a fan of long form writing 😉)
4/ User behavior after a fork: “the creation of a child chain does not appear to correlate with a decline in daily active users or transaction volume on the parent chain.”
5/ “The loyalty of core developers to the original chain is striking, as the number of top 30 contributors from the original codebase that become exclusive contributors to the child is almost zero” (Graph = Sorensen Dice Coefficient)
6/ Unsurprisingly, most miners are loyal to profit only, “exhibiting highly efficient economic behavior in exploiting opportunities across networks.” (Graph = relative profitability between parent & child chain)
7/ "It is often casually argued that network rents can be 'forked away,' with value flowing to a less rent-seeking fork. While we lack sufficient evidence to confidently reject this hypothesis, early evidence points against it." -@alexhevans
8/ Comparing NVT Ratios for #Bitcoin / #BitcoinCash & #Ethereum / $ETC reveals child chains often trade at a premium to the parent.
9/ Shoutout to @Kalichkin and his team @CryptolabCap for informal work we did together on relative valuation ratios of different #cryptonetworks a few months ago (but that never saw the light of day).
10/ Similar result for Network Value to Metcalfe’s law Ratio (NVM Ratio), as both $BCH and $ETC trade at premiums to $BTC and $ETH.
11/ Explanations for child chains being valued “more richly” than the parent:
1) More illiquid coins than parent 2) Insurance premium to parent meltdown 3) Assisted by "mental value anchoring" to parent
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ A PoS industry is rapidly emerging that will someday rival PoW in profits and wealth creation.
2/ That's billions in profit and tens of billions in wealth creation for PoS providers (at current PoW levels), with at least an order of magnitude of headroom.
3/ This is despite PoW & PoS having a shared destiny as commodity industries with thin margins.
PoW will converge on the cost of electricity and PoS on the cost of crypto-capital (?).
1/ While new crypto value capture mechanisms can rise to prominence in bull markets, they are tested, hardened and de-risked by bear markets.
2/ Only those that survive multiple crypto bear markets establish themselves as reliable “value capture mechanisms.”
3/ Store of value (SoV) = only crypto value capture mechanism that's significantly de-risked, but that doesn’t mean SoV is the only one that will ever work.
1/ Many tokens currently face stagnant cryptoeconomies, as supply was never spent or earned, but instead brought into existence via balance sheet swaps.
2/ “Balance sheet swaps”= investors in ICOs swapping assets with the issuer, giving birth to a native token without it ever having to go into *circulation.*
3/ Most ICO investors then held the token on their balance sheets, as they never planned to be on the supply-side or demand-side of the network.
1/ When studying non-fungible #cryptoassets, I'm seeing two types discussed: "functionals" and "investment instruments."
2/ "Functionals" are non-fungibles that are meant to be used, a means to access services like ticketing, voting, payment, and more. Best existing examples?
3/ "Investment instrument" non-fungibles are held for their store of value characteristics, be they solely digital things, or derivations of meatspace assets (real estate, art, cars, etc).
1/ Get ready for a predictable #crypto pattern: in the coming months, we will see an increasing number of #Bitcoin maximalists tormenting “altcoin investors” for straying from the mother ship.
2/ The maximalist drum will get louder as we go deeper into the bear market, with #bitcoin falling less than most other coins, and its dominance index growing. coinmarketcap.com/charts/#domina…
3/ #Bitcoin is the benchmark after all, the market beta of crypto, with most everything oscillating at a higher amplitude than $BTC.
2/ While a drop in velocity may seem problematic, it’s actually what you’d expect from a *reserve currency.*
3/ With a reserve currency, as confidence falls market wide more people will hold onto the reserve asset (in this case, #bitcoin), dropping its velocity.