I find the timing mentioned by #JulieSwetnick to be troubling. She seems to have buried her social media, but it appears she is now 55. If she graduated HS at a normal age (17-18), she should have graduated in 1981 (born in 1963), making Kavanaugh and Judge Sophomores when she...
was a Senior. The idea of Sophomores in HS getting time with a HS Senior is a bit of a stretch, but let's go there. It gets hard to believe when she says she attended well over 10 house parties where they were present from 1981-1983. If she graduated HS in 1981, how would she...
have had any interactions with them beyond spring of 1981. Graduation from HS is a major break from going to HS parties. Once people graduate, especially if they go to college, they don't go back to HS parties. Big question: When did she graduate HS & where did she go to college?
One other pertinent fact: Anyone familiar w/the DC area knows it's VERY unlikely that a student attending Gaithersburg HS would be in the same social circles as kids from private schools like Georgetown Prep. They're not only physically miles away but socially very far apart.
Update: #Julieswetnick's DOB is 12/30/62, making 1981 the definitive year she should have graduated HS unless she was held back. She was THREE years older than #JudgeKavanaugh and would have graduated when he was a sophomore...yet went to parties w/him for the next 2 years???
Update 2: #JulieSwetnick graduated in 1980 (see resume). Thus, she was in college for the ENTIRE TIME FRAME covered in her affidavit. She went to "well over" 10 high school parties where there was spiking of drinks & gang raping...AFTER she graduated HS! web.archive.org/web/2018092618…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Given the spin in the media and by leftist Hollywood/celebs + skewed (or fabricated) polls , it can sometimes be hard to know where the public stands on an issue. People tend to live in their "bubble" and get affirmed w/in their own echo chamber.
2/
While this is not a scientific method, I thought I would analyze data available on Twitter, which is open to all people but is known to skew things to the left, to see what the numbers tell us about support for or opposition to #JudgeKavanaugh.
3/
My method was simple. To avoid being "served" input from within my bubble, I did this analysis anonymously while logged out of Twitter. I pulled the 15 top results served by Twitter on a search of "Kavanaugh" and compiled these results, which are VERY interesting.
I wanted to post this update to give a quick interpretation to #Q's latest posts this evening.
In 2017, Q had posted about "The Hunt for Red October."
2/ Those who have read Tom Clancy know this is a reference to the great novel about a cat-and-mouse game involving a Russian nuclear sub that is looking to defect to the US.
So what did Q mean in this and the many other references to Red October?
3/ When the phrase included "The Hunt for"...Q was giving a clue that it was a reference to a rogue nuclear sub, likely the one that went missing from North Korea in 2017. It was being controlled by the #DeepState.
Recall the "false" [not false] Hawaiian Jan 2018 missile alert.
#Q's posts are monitored by both #Patriots & the #DeepState, so Q cannot telegraph every move. However, there's seems to be a clock in place, w/post numbers essentially acting as a countdown to 2400...midnight for the #cabal...w/a planned #RedOctober take down.
#RedOctober has clearly referenced a timeline where the coordinated arrests will occur this month, prior to the 2018 election.
"Red October" was first referenced on 11/20/17 as "The Hunt for Red October."
"Red October" has appeared 20 times in #Q's posts.
The reference to "The Hunt for Red October" was thought to have many meanings:
- Dealing w/a rogue nuclear sub (think Hawaii)
- Cyberespionage malware
- The plan culmination in the plan in October 2018 (#RedOctober)
There are many inconsistencies, or even outright lies, when it comes to the "story" outlined by #ChristineBlaseyFord. Here are a few:
# people at party
# timing/year of party
# location of party
# never mentioned Kavanaugh by name until July 2018
# layout of party
# your self-identified "witnesses" all refute that they attended any such party
# your long-time friend #LelandKeyser further states she has never met #JudgeKavanaugh
# you never mentioned this assault to anyone prior to 2012 therapy session...including during long-term relationship
# you claimed the revelation of abuse came from a therapy session in 2012 w/your husband, prompted by an argument over wanting 2 front doors to your home...
Happy Anniversary to #TheStorm! One year ago today, #POTUS announced to a confused press corps: “This is the calm before the storm!“
2/
Those who have done their own research, or who are lucky enough to have discovered #QAnon, know what was meant by the reference to “The Storm.” It is now upon us, and the Deep State is in full panic mode.
3/
Many months ago, some smart anons who are very good at seeing patterns discovered that #Q”s posts seem to relate to a clock dial in terms of timing. The dates of posts and the post numbers sometimes contain their own meaning.
2/ Anyone who supports #JudgeKavanaugh should not be concerned w/a one week investigation as long as:
- #POTUS has control over the rogue #FBI.
- #RuleofLaw is restored.
3/ The #WhiteHats are now in contol...including of the #FBI. Witness the ouster and/or referral for prosecution of #Comey, #McCabe, #Strzok, #Page, #JamesBaker, et al (T makes it hard to ID ALL of the traitors).