More inconsistencies with #ChristineBlaseyFord!

The problem with a lie, especially when involving other people, is that it's hard to repeat the lie consistently and have various accounts match up. I will do a deeper thread on the overall #DeepState attack on #JudgeKavanaugh...
which is what the smear campaign really is. Let me outline the items in #Fords' accusations that are either SPECIFIC contradictions or don't match with common sense. I will start with her corroborations:
1. Despite the "party," which was really a small get-together, only...
having five people in attendance (as of her most-recent account), including Ford, NOT ONE of those people identified as being at the event recalls the event. This was not a "typical" event as she claims two men tried to rape her, and she fled the scene without telling her one...
friend, #LelandIngrahamKeyser, that she was leaving. According to #Ford's official account, we are left to believe these FACTS:
- Keyser, a 15-year-old freshman, would have been left behind alone at a gathering with three 17-year-old boys who were HS Juniors, with no one else...
remaining. TWO of the three boys would have just attempted rape on her friend and had stumbled back down to be with Keyser and #PJSmyth (the other boy). Keyser is supposed to have not noticed that she was ditched by THE ONLY OTHER GIRL at this initiate HS event. Most...
reasonable people would recognize the situation outlined above as being highly memorable...a 15-year-old girl left alone by her friend without notice with three older boys, two of whom are accused rapists. You would think Keyser would recall such an unusual event.
2. Part of Keyser's refutation of Ford's claim is that Keyser NEVER met Kavanaugh:
"Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford."

We are left to believe that Keyser...
does not recall meeting Kavanaugh despite the events outlined above, in which she was alone at a HS party with three boys two years her senior, one of whom was #JudgeKavanaugh and who had stumbled down drunk after her friend disappeared.
3. Next, Ford claims she NEVER DISCUSSED the events she alleges with anyone, family, friends, etc. While sexual assault can cause someone to clam up and try to keep it secret, we are to believe that Ford's friend Keyser would not have contacted her that night or the next day...
to check in with her on why she left the party so suddenly, w/o even telling her. Even if Ford kept secret the reason, Keyser would certainly recall such an unusual episode.
4. Let's now look at "specifics" laid out by Ford related to the events. Key details are either missing or contradictory.
5. How many/who was at party?
- The Sept. 16 article in WaPo indicates that Ford's therapist's notes show "FOUR BOYS WERE INVOLVED."…
- In this article, posted 11 days ago, Ford explains away this discrepancy. WaPo: "Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room."
- Really? How does this explain the discrepancy when Ford's official story has THREE men and one other female at the party,...
all of whom (including her best friend) deny ever being at such party. It's interesting that Ford's team REFUSES TO RELEASE the therapist's notes...all while calling for a federal investigation. What are they hiding?
- Next, how does Ford make her official story match with her handwritten notes (p. 5 of polygraph doc below), which state: "There were FOUR BOYS and a COUPLE OF GIRLS."
- The typed notes in the polygraph mention the 3 names boys but not Keyser.…
So, including Ford, were there 5, 6, or 7 people at this party, and why so many inconsistencies?
- A reading of the handwritten and typed notes in the polygraph are not only contradictory in terms of who was there...they also contradict other claims she has made later...
- The polygraphed notes show she was "pushed into a bedroom by either Kavanaugh or his friend, Mark."
- However, in the Feinstein letter, Ford said, "Kavanaugh physically pushed me into a bedroom as I was headed for a bathroom up a short stairwell from the living room."
- In her most-recent prepared statement, she's back to not knowing who pushed her: "I couldn’t see who pushed me." Interestingly, her FINAL claim tries to clear up contradictions: Now there may have been a 4th (unnamed) man, music was already playing...…
6. Now we get to core specifics that REALLY MATTER in trying to corroborate Ford's story. WHEN and WHERE did this happen? The fact that she cannot even provide a YEAR when this happened is concerning. Given her DOB, claimed age (15), & that it happened during summer, it seems...
easy to piece together at least the year. Her early versions claim it happened "in the early 1980s." Including ALL written letters and her polygraph, she was never more specific than "early '80s." Her prepared statement suddenly has honed in on the summer of 1982.
Why such ambiguity on the year, let alone the date, of the event until this very last moment...AFTER Kavanaugh's personal calendar from 1982 was publicly leaked? Was Ford trying to keep open the date to make it impossible for Kavanaugh to provide a provable alibi?
As to WHERE this party occurred, this has evolved from the ambiguous "suburban Marlyand home" to "a house in the Chevy Chase-Bethesda area." This evolution occurred yesterday, in the release of her prepared statement. WHY was the location so vague until now?...
It's much harder to dispute an allegation if one lacks a specific date, time, & location than if these are known. Withholding these specifics until the eve of the hearing is very suspect, at a minimum, and likely a deliberate ploy to deny Kavanaugh the ability to have a...
specific response/defense.

I believe Ford's placement of an unnamed 4th boy at the event in her prepared statement is more than an effort to clean up her many contradictions about who was in attendance. She faces a huge problem. The party was held at the home of SOMEONE whose...
parents were absent. None of the four named parties (Kavanaugh, Judge, Smyth, or Keyser) live in the Bethesda-Chevy Chase area. All of Ford's previous official claims faced this huge problem. There was a need to add a 4th, unknown boy as the implicit host of the party.
This home in the BCC area would be very close to where Ford lived, helping to also explain how she got there and returned home without someone driving her...she must have walked if her claims are true. HOW can she not know WHERE the party happened given that:
- The party clearly must have happened in her own neighborhood, walking distance from Columbia Country Club, where she spent virtually every summer day at the pool.
- The host of the party was a neighbor. How does she recall names of all others but not her neighbor host?
This final, critical detail that the party occurred in the BCC neighborhood was released within the last 24 hours to help cover holes in her story, but how is it credible that this was never mentioned before and that the MOST IMPORTANT NAME (the party's host) cannot be recalled?
7. There has been ZERO corroboration for Ford's story. The MSM breathlessly reported that 4 independent people (one being Ford's husband) had corroborated her story, but all the did was substantiate that she had told them, starting in 2012, that she had been assaulted.
Recall, the problem with evolving lies involves keeping them straight. One of her "substantiators," Keith Kogler, claims Ford told him, on June 29 of this year, that Kavanaugh was her attacker.

So how does this marry with her official, prepared statement from yesterday:
"But until July 2018, I had never named Mr. Kavanaugh as my attacker outside of therapy." Ford's statement has other contradictions with this one supporter's sworn affidavit of her communications.
8. Finally, WHY did Ford scrub her social media and take a polygraph test when she always intended to be anonymous...long before her name was "leaked"? The strong appearance from this and her refusal to release therapist's about politics and not truth.


• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with #RedOctober-ArrestsAreImminent

#RedOctober-ArrestsAreImminent Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ObamaTruth1

Oct 8, 2018

#JudgeKavanaugh #TRUTH

Given the spin in the media and by leftist Hollywood/celebs + skewed (or fabricated) polls , it can sometimes be hard to know where the public stands on an issue. People tend to live in their "bubble" and get affirmed w/in their own echo chamber.

While this is not a scientific method, I thought I would analyze data available on Twitter, which is open to all people but is known to skew things to the left, to see what the numbers tell us about support for or opposition to #JudgeKavanaugh.

My method was simple. To avoid being "served" input from within my bubble, I did this analysis anonymously while logged out of Twitter. I pulled the 15 top results served by Twitter on a search of "Kavanaugh" and compiled these results, which are VERY interesting.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 5, 2018
#QAnon Update

I wanted to post this update to give a quick interpretation to #Q's latest posts this evening.

In 2017, Q had posted about "The Hunt for Red October."
Those who have read Tom Clancy know this is a reference to the great novel about a cat-and-mouse game involving a Russian nuclear sub that is looking to defect to the US.

So what did Q mean in this and the many other references to Red October?
When the phrase included "The Hunt for"...Q was giving a clue that it was a reference to a rogue nuclear sub, likely the one that went missing from North Korea in 2017. It was being controlled by the #DeepState.

Recall the "false" [not false] Hawaiian Jan 2018 missile alert.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 5, 2018
#QCLock Theory

#Q's posts are monitored by both #Patriots & the #DeepState, so Q cannot telegraph every move. However, there's seems to be a clock in place, w/post numbers essentially acting as a countdown to 2400...midnight for the #cabal...w/a planned #RedOctober take down.
#RedOctober has clearly referenced a timeline where the coordinated arrests will occur this month, prior to the 2018 election.

"Red October" was first referenced on 11/20/17 as "The Hunt for Red October."
"Red October" has appeared 20 times in #Q's posts.

The reference to "The Hunt for Red October" was thought to have many meanings:
- Dealing w/a rogue nuclear sub (think Hawaii)
- Cyberespionage malware
- The plan culmination in the plan in October 2018 (#RedOctober)
Read 8 tweets
Oct 5, 2018


There are many inconsistencies, or even outright lies, when it comes to the "story" outlined by #ChristineBlaseyFord. Here are a few:
# people at party
# timing/year of party
# location of party
# never mentioned Kavanaugh by name until July 2018
# layout of party
# your self-identified "witnesses" all refute that they attended any such party
# your long-time friend #LelandKeyser further states she has never met #JudgeKavanaugh
# you never mentioned this assault to anyone prior to 2012 therapy session...including during long-term relationship
# you claimed the revelation of abuse came from a therapy session in 2012 w/your husband, prompted by an argument over wanting 2 front doors to your home...
Read 19 tweets
Oct 5, 2018

Happy Anniversary to #TheStorm! One year ago today, #POTUS announced to a confused press corps: “This is the calm before the storm!“

Those who have done their own research, or who are lucky enough to have discovered #QAnon, know what was meant by the reference to “The Storm.” It is now upon us, and the Deep State is in full panic mode.

Many months ago, some smart anons who are very good at seeing patterns discovered that #Q”s posts seem to relate to a clock dial in terms of timing. The dates of posts and the post numbers sometimes contain their own meaning.
Read 10 tweets
Oct 1, 2018
"Trust the Plan."
"Trust Wray."
"Sky is Falling Week."

Let's interpret.
Anyone who supports #JudgeKavanaugh should not be concerned w/a one week investigation as long as:
- #POTUS has control over the rogue #FBI.
- #RuleofLaw is restored.
The #WhiteHats are now in contol...including of the #FBI. Witness the ouster and/or referral for prosecution of #Comey, #McCabe, #Strzok, #Page, #JamesBaker, et al (T makes it hard to ID ALL of the traitors).
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!