Thread by @STUinSD

Thread: On Democrat Information Operations

1. My wife and I listened to the Dr. Fraud and Judge Kavanaugh testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee while driving through Wyoming today (off Twitter for a while except intermittently).

2. Our reaction was that Dr. Fraud provided ZERO new information, corroborating evidence, or anything that reinforced her claim that Kavanaugh assaulted her. Period. We also agreed that there were complete inconsistencies….

2A. …(remembering nonsensical details and “forgetting” the stuff that really counted!). We also felt (remember we were only listening to her audio) that her emotion was an act, as it switched on and off depending on the particular answer given.

2B. It’s even possible if not likely that she was practicing transference, i.e., the redirection of trauma to someone different than the actual perpetrator. The woman certainly came across as loony enough that this is a distinct possibility (stimulated by her left-wing lawyer?).

3. We also agreed that Kavanaugh’s opening statement was absolutely the most powerful of its kind ever given to a Senate committee – certainly the most genuine and to-the-point that either of us had ever heard! It was powerful, emotional, and from the heart – and genuine!

4. The only thing we wished Kavanaugh had said that would have been different was his response to the pestering by that despicable Sen. Durbin about whether he would support an FBI investigation.

5. The correct answer would have been: "The Committee conducted an investigation, and all witnesses cited by the accuser signed statements averring that the incident did not happen; what else needs to be investigated, Sen. Durbin?”

6. And Sen. Graham shocked the hell out of us by his OUTSTANDING statement near the end. While I have questioned his stance on issues like amnesty (calling him “Grahamnesty” from time to time), he hit exactly the right notes in calling out the Democrat attack machine….

6A. …and in defending Kavanaugh against the obviously coordinated political attack against a main of impeccable character. (My wife: and this is the political party that has virtually canonized a drunken Democrat senator who got a woman killed!)

7. Graham pointed out the larger issue – the completely despicable way in which the Democrats have politicized the judicial confirmation process in pursuit of their extremist political goals.

8. This is the new age of information Operations. Make a claim - deny the ability to substantiate - even deny the claim - publish widely anyway and just let the IDEA of the claim take hold. Those fuzzy, cloudy millennial minds clamp onto the idea and behold! A Belief Is Born!

9. Once in a while on YouTube, I watch those Alt-News folks go on-campus and ask questions of the students. The students know jack squat!

10. They ramble on about something vaguely close to the subject asked about and are usually so way off that it is obvious the student has absolutely no frickin' idea what they are talking about.

11. But, it IS obvious that they are reacting to some whack report or news article that has been subjected to the "rumor game.” About 5% will know what is going on and have a valid opinion on the subject. I would bet that this 5% belong to the campus conservative student's club.

12. The Liberals know that such low-level propaganda works, and they use it all the time. And this is based in legitimate psychology studies.

13. Example: as taught in law school and first presented to me by a lawyer that was preparing me to be a good witness in court, the FIRST thing that a person hears about a subject sticks and tends to overrule even a PROVEN correction.

14. In court, it is the reason a lawyer will present a false premise or out of context fact for the record.

15. The jury, hearing this, will usually, even after correction by the opposing lawyer or the judge's order to disregard, default to the first thing they heard when making the big decision to determine the jury's finding.

16. In this way the accuser (who always goes 1st) gets to unreasonably influence the jury. The defense (this is all about putting one's opposition on the defense) has to just about turn itself inside out to reverse the effects of "1st Claim.” Except the tables were turned today!

17. I could go on all day about manipulation; it is the basis of all negotiation and also trying to convince people that lies are facts. Don't believe me? Ask D. Trump about the effects of #FAKENEWS! And worse! Introducing a total lie can alter a person's memory.

18. Example: "Did the ambulance come before or after the police car arrive?" Even though an ambulance never did respond - a witness will "invent" a memory of the arrival - before or after the police arrival ….

18A. …because the question makes the person believe that it happened, and the mind fills in the gaps.

19. This is EXACTLY what I believe was the result of the obvious coaching of Dr. Fraud. Something MAY have happened to her at some point in the past, but it certainly did NOT involve Judge Kavanaugh – until that was planted in her mind over time.

20. Anyway, make a screwy fake claim, have it refuted and disproved, and recycle it through sympathetic and unquestioning media reports (that’s the likes of CNN and MSNBC do!).

21. The lemmings and Democrat rank and file only remember some fuzzy version of the original fake claim - the complicated argument and refuting facts are too much for the fuzzy brained to recall.

22. And, it is well known that proving a negative is a neat trick - if possible at all. Make the allegation and let the innocently accused person attempt to debunk the false claim. This is EXACTLY what transpired during today’s kabuki!

23. All this can be vetted in Alinsky's book, and that is the playbook still in play with Democrats. Which is why it is important to study the enemy, the enemy order of battle, the enemy's base concepts of operations, and the enemy’s political tactics that are used and reused.

24. I don’t know about you, but I have low to no regard for those that are easily spoofed. We caught a couple of comments by MSNBC “anal – ysts” after Dr. Fraud’s testimony, and their comments were flat-out propaganda with NO regard for due process of production of real evidence.

25. We have witnessed coordinated Democrat information operations for decades now (think the Anita Hill B.S. and the process that led to the creation of the verb “bork” to the English language!). After today, we need to add another verb to the language: to be “kavanaughed.”

26. To be “kavanaughed” means to be falsely accused without any corroborating evidence in pursuit of a political agenda without regard to the personal impact on the accused and his family.

27. Folks, it is possible that the Democrats have finally jumped the shark in their dastardly information operations and personal attacks on their political enemies. But the only way to ensure that that is in fact the cases is to vote straight ticket Republican on 6 November.

28. And to send as many of the execrable Democrats packing back into private life as possible! Judge Kavanaugh identified the sources of evil today. We need to make them pay in November. And maybe “kavanaugh” will become a POSITIVE verb that conservatives can support! ///The end.