While I was buying grass seed at the hardware store just now, I noticed that YETI now makes a 16oz coffee mug and have never impulse-bought anything faster. It is sweeeet. #DadLife
Yesss.
Also, #ProTip for you young dads out there as we enter aeration/overseeding season: splurge on the grass seed coated with fertilizer - not only does it grow faster, but the damn birds won't eat it!
I learned this the hard way back in the fall of '13: saved a few bucks and bought the uncoated stuff and the backyard looked like a scene from a Hitchcock movie. And the lawn ended up very patchy. Awful.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Lincicome

Scott Lincicome Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scottlincicome

Oct 1, 2018
A thread on NAFTA 2.0's Good, Bad & Ugly:
First, a BIG caveat: there's a lot here, & it'll take time to draw definitive technical conclusions (esp given how the agreement is posted ustr.gov/trade-agreemen…). These are just initial opinions & subject to change as details emerge /1
The Good:
1) as @JimPethokoukis rightly points out (aei.org/publication/tr…), this is generally a victory for pro-trade/globalization forces. NAFTA's basic free(r) trade principles (goods & services) remain, & uncertainty is reduced (tho not eliminated, yet). /2
2) there's actually some trade liberalization in this deal! (Crazy, I know) Canada opens its dairy market a little (keyword: a little - 0.34%); the US in exchange opens up a little on dairy, peanuts, & sugar. Good for consumers (tho not ideal free trade). De minimis raised too /3
Read 20 tweets
Sep 10, 2018
PSA: the entire city of Raleigh appears to be out of portable generators #Florence
And at least one Raleigh resident is kicking himself for putting off that generator purchase that he said he'd do this year.
He's also, btw, pretty annoyed at Amazon for not letting him get 2-day Prime delivery on a sweet 8000W generator that would keep most of his house running. So much for the 21st century.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 18, 2018
And no mention of the pricetag - in taxes & higher prices - of those job "gains"
Newsflash: the Government giving a handful of well-connected companies a tariff-based monopoly in the US market can, believe it or not, increase those companies' output and employment (at least for a while) /2
The problem, especially when it comes to tariffs, is that those new jobs ALWAYS come at a VERY high, direct cost to US consumers and the US economy more broadly. /3
Read 13 tweets
Jul 25, 2018
The EU statement makes clear that the steel/aluminum tariffs remain in force (& no concrete commitments). But the tone is better, and maybe(?) no auto tariffs as long as they keep talking.
europa.eu/rapid/press-re…
Let's unpack this statement, shall we?
Paras 1-3: happytalk
Paras 4-5: an agreement to start talking about a deal for full trade liberalization in "non-auto industrial goods" (ie, no cars, no ag) + reducing barriers in services, chemicals, pharma & soybeans. AKA "TTIP Very Lite"
(A very detailed rundown of TTIP's ambition is here: ustr.gov/about-us/polic…)
Read 9 tweets
Jul 7, 2018
Also this one:
The speed with which American partisans have switched sides on "economic patriotism" - sometimes involving the exact same policy (eg solar panel protectionism) - would be breathtaking if it weren't so damn predictable and sad.
Read 6 tweets
May 12, 2018
👇THREAD 👇
It really is something: we hear all the time abt how policymakers who supported the elimination of trade restrictions disregarded the impact on Real America (or whatever). But this stuff? Nada. /2
It's debatable abt whether free traders really did ignore the disrupted, whether eliminating entrenched govt protectionism actually demands special treatment for the formerly-protected, or whether good natl policy really shld be sacrificed when it causes narrow harms /3
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(